[00:02:20] Any screenshot of the Vector skin? [00:18:12] mm, it seems that the internet explorer issues are still occuring [01:15:38] thedj, available? [01:18:50] Well, anyone interested on an interview? [01:18:52] for Wikinews? [01:22:19] it's Saturday [01:22:39] Yesh. [10:35:42] werdna: if you spot a usability contracter, give them a nudge about the IE issue please ? bugzilla:22983 [13:27:14] RoanKattouw: about the IE issue. [13:27:25] Yeah [13:27:31] it is apparently because IE falls into compatibility mode [13:27:44] and it started doing this after the latest usability deploy. [13:28:00] the only other reason i can phantom, is the sitenotice, which launched around the same time. [13:28:20] but it's a weird bug for sure. [13:28:23] The recruitment sitenotice? [13:28:24] Yeah [13:29:27] RoanKattouw: i hid it, not idea actually what this one is about :D [13:29:59] I only see the scholarships notice right now [13:30:10] someone did a redskin of vector btw. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Hmmwhatsthisdo/vector.css [13:33:00] Ooh looks nice [13:33:27] The shade of red reminds me of C&C [13:43:54] Welcome back commander? [13:44:07] idd [14:10:52] freaky [14:47:45] RoanKattouw: I don't disagree that the tesla documentation should be on wikitech, but I don't have an account on it. I needed some quick documentation somewhere to avoid going insane trying to remember what backend ips I assigned to vms. I also needed some data for my prototype wiki :) [14:49:27] OK [14:49:47] I'll see if I can create an account for you [14:51:53] ok [15:04:14] Seems I can't [15:04:18] Will ask someone who can [16:21:55] *RoanKattouw cheers on adam_miller [16:22:03] I'll catch up on code review after dinner [16:22:14] hey RoanKattouw! [16:22:24] didn't expect anyone else to be around [16:23:23] i'll get your comments on my commits from yesterday addressed in the next half an hour so you can re-review those while you're at it [16:27:17] Cool [16:27:18] Thanks [18:53:37] RoanKattouw: would this be good for the regex? [18:54:11] (/^(\s*)]*)>([^\<]+)?<\/ref\>(\s*)$/) [18:55:20] Looks sane [18:55:31] I still think ([^\<]+)? is weird [18:55:36] Yes, it is. [18:55:48] Might as well use ([^\<]*) [18:55:54] oh right i actually have that changed [18:55:54] :) [18:56:12] [18:56:18] Are you not trying to catch that case? [18:56:31] I also don't see why you would parenthesize [^\>]* , just messes up the indexes of the other parenthesized subexpressions [18:56:44] Oh wait [18:56:54] You need to store that to rebuild the ref tag, of course [19:50:58] RoanKattouw: do we need to catch ? I don't know much about how ref tags are used [19:51:20] At this point I'd say no [19:51:26] Do you know what that tag does? [19:51:34] It doesn't create an empty reference [19:51:48] nope [19:53:06] The speed limit on California Interstates is 65 mph{{cite web|blah blah blah}}. In Montana, there are some Interstates with a speed limit of 90 mph. [19:53:30] (Disclaimer: I made this text up, I'm not 100% certain these statements are actually true) [19:57:22] ahh, thats cool [19:57:47] It'll render as First sentence [1]. Second sentence [1]. [19:57:58] And the reference itself will show as 1 a b Reference text here [19:58:07] Where a and b link to the respective usages [19:58:47] We could try to do some voodoo and track down the first, defining occurrence of the ref tag, but I think that's out of the scope of the reference dialog for now [19:58:51] It was just intended to be simple [20:01:20] i would agree