[22:47:44] <urandom>	 can someone explain this convention of session note-taking, where everthing is transcribed verbatim?
[22:47:48] * urandom is curious
[22:52:38] <bawolff>	 I think its been mentioned in other years, but we always seem to come back to doing it that way
[22:53:12] <urandom>	 bawolff: been mentioned?
[22:53:47] <bawolff>	 I remember other years people were saying things that notes should be summaries/conclusions/main points etc
[22:53:56] <bawolff>	 instead of verbatim
[22:54:53] <urandom>	 i can see value in a having a transcription, but it does seem a very different thing to "notes", and that if a transcription is the desired result, there might be better ways
[22:55:28] <urandom>	 like hiring a stenographer