[03:07:30] <wm-bridgebot>	 [telegram] <Thecladis> is mw.loader running on ie6? I just had to remove syntax like
[03:07:31] <wm-bridgebot>	 [telegram] <Thecladis> () => {}
[03:07:33] <wm-bridgebot>	 [telegram] <Thecladis> or
[03:07:34] <wm-bridgebot>	 [telegram] <Thecladis> `${foo}`
[03:07:35] <wm-bridgebot>	 [telegram] <Thecladis> from my code to stop receiving random parse error :/
[10:44:29] <wm-bridgebot>	 [telegram] <Alex> Isn't that ES6 syntax @Thecladis ? We probably won't allow that for browser compatibility
[10:44:57] <wm-bridgebot>	 [telegram] <Thecladis> Indeed, so something that is around since 2015 or so (re @Alex: Isn't that ES6 syntax @Thecladis ? We probably won't allow that for browser compatibility)
[10:45:50] <wm-bridgebot>	 [telegram] <Thecladis> It makes sense not to allow it in the core codebase, but why limit user created gadgets?
[10:47:00] <wm-bridgebot>	 [telegram] <Alex> We expect JS to be able to run under IE11 I think
[10:47:52] <wm-bridgebot>	 [telegram] <Alex> Presumably it's too easy for an admin to make a gadget default for all users and break that
[10:49:10] <wm-bridgebot>	 [telegram] <Thecladis> 🤔
[10:51:49] <wm-bridgebot>	 [telegram] <Alex> https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T178356
[10:56:41] <wm-bridgebot>	 [telegram] <Alex> https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T75714
[11:55:14] <wm-bridgebot>	 [telegram] <Thecladis> So besides browser compatibility there is also an issue with no suitable minifier available at the moment? (re @Alex: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T75714)
[11:59:23] <wm-bridgebot>	 [telegram] <Thecladis> It would probably nice if there was a flag to explicitly allow es6 in gadget definitions which would also be mutually excusive with the default flag. I see that the latter task has a similar suggestion (re @Alex: Presumably it's too easy for an admin to make a gadget default for all users and break that)
[11:59:30] <wm-bridgebot>	 [telegram] <Thecladis> It would probably be nice if there was a flag to explicitly allow es6 in gadget definitions which would also be mutually excusive with the default flag. I see that the latter task has a similar suggestion (re @Alex: Presumably it's too easy for an admin to make a gadget default for all users and break that)
[11:59:41] <wm-bridgebot>	 [telegram] <Thecladis> It would probably be nice if there was a flag to explicitly allow es6 in gadget definitions which would also be mutually exclusive with the default flag. I see that the latter task has a similar suggestion (re @Alex: Presumably it's too easy for an admin to make a gadget default for all users and break that)
[12:59:49] <Krenair>	 I guess the other thing is we might want to mark gadgets requiring ES6 on the gadgets page when users opt into them
[12:59:52] <Krenair>	 where*
[21:50:38] <wm-bridgebot>	 [telegram] <Tohaomg> Hello, folks. I need an advice from you
[21:51:21] <wm-bridgebot>	 [telegram] <Tohaomg> I need to get a list of all websites which have "gov.ua" in their URI
[21:52:14] <wm-bridgebot>	 [telegram] <Tohaomg> I came up with idea to google "site:gov.ua", but there should be a better option.
[21:53:37] <wm-bridgebot>	 [telegram] <Tohaomg> Like, is there any way to get the list from DNS?
[22:02:25] <Reedy>	 Depends on the NS
[22:03:06] <Reedy>	 Chances are you won't be able to do AXFR requests, so no