[10:08:29] [telegram] there is no need to use a "weird git plugin" to use Gerrit. this is incorrect. it's optional and many find it makes things easier. (re @Thecladis: oh. well. I do not know indeed. but gerrit is definitely bad. from the need to use some weird git plug in to, what I have discovered only last week, that one must have no more than one commit per patch.) [10:11:05] [telegram] Github is not easier to somebody who never used it before. people find things easier because they have done them before but it's not an objective and inherent thing that one is "easy" and the other is not. (re @wmtelegram_bot: [irc] But honestly complaints about that are strange to me as GitHub is far more difficult to automate Pull Request creation from) [11:43:28] [telegram] Totally agreed, In fact I know some people who worked with both and actually quite like gerrit because of the obvious workflow compared to github. (re @mutante23: Github is not easier to somebody who never used it before. people find things easier because they have done them before but it's not an objective and inherent thing that one is "easy" and the other is not.) [12:08:31] [telegram] Um I see no time stamps for those stories on the blog? (re @Sarah R: We just launched [[WM:Techblog]], a new place to share stories from the Wikimedia technical community with the world. Yay!🎉 [12:08:32] [telegram] https://techblog.wikimedia.org/ [12:08:33] [telegram] https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2020-March/093250.html) [12:12:56] [telegram] https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T248867 (re @fuzheado: Um I see no time stamps for those stories on the blog?) [12:13:40] [telegram] Thanks! (re @lucaswerkmeister: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T248867) [15:22:29] [telegram] Hey folks, time stamps have been enabled on the posts 😊 [17:15:15] [telegram] Thanks much! (re @Sarah R: Hey folks, time stamps have been enabled on the posts 😊)