[15:37:16] <wm-bb>	 [telegram] <ramzymuliawan> What is the best FLOSS option for a plagiarism checker?
[15:53:25] <wm-bb>	 [telegram] <psychoslave> No idea, but I'm interested to know more on the context of the demand
[16:24:27] <wm-bb>	 [telegram] <edoderoo> you mean something like https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios/ ? (re @ramzymuliawan: What is the best FLOSS option for a plagiarism checker?)
[16:25:31] <wm-bb>	 [telegram] <ramzymuliawan> Yeah, that's one option, but then I realized it also relies on Turnitin (which is not FLOSS) (re @edoderoo: you mean something like https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios/ ?)
[16:26:26] <wm-bb>	 [telegram] <edoderoo> I have no idea what FLOSS means.
[16:27:13] <wm-bb>	 [telegram] <ramzymuliawan> [[Free and open-source software]] (re @edoderoo: I have no idea what FLOSS means.)
[16:32:41] <wm-bb>	 [telegram] <jhsoby> [[en:FLOSS]] 😊
[16:34:42] <wm-bb>	 [telegram] <ramzymuliawan> I was reading the [[meta:WikiJournal]] proposal and it struck to me that for the project to be feasible, a FLOSS plagiarism checker would need to exist first... but I couldn't think of a good example. Seems like the proposer already recognized this need. (re @psychoslave: No idea, but I'm interested to know more on the context of the demand)
[16:35:05] <wm-bb>	 [telegram] <ramzymuliawan> I was reading the [[meta:WikiJournal]] proposal and it struck me that for the project could be feasible, a FLOSS plagiarism checker would need to exist first... but I couldn't think of a good example. Seems like the proposer already recognized this need (re @psychoslave: No idea, but I'm interested to know more on the context of the demand)
[16:37:46] <wm-bb>	 [telegram] <ramzymuliawan> I was reading the [[meta:WikiJournal]] proposal and it struck me that for the project to be feasible, a FLOSS plagiarism checker would need to exist first... but I couldn't think of a good example. Seems like the proposer already recognized this need (re @psychoslave: No idea, but I'm interested to know more on the context of the demand)
[16:39:44] <wm-bb>	 [telegram] <Jan_ainali> Why? It's not a project aimed at software, is it? (re @ramzymuliawan: I was reading the [[meta:WikiJournal]] proposal and it struck me that for the project to be feasible, a FLOSS plagiarism checker would need to exist first... but I couldn't think of a good example. Seems like the proposer already recognized this need)
[16:41:54] <wm-bb>	 [telegram] <ramzymuliawan> No it's not, but the existence of one would greatly benefit the project in a long-run and ensured its sustainability.