[09:09:37] <wm-bb>	 [telegram] <Paulo_Darwin> @Ladsgroup congratulations, the logo looks great. I immediately liked the change 😁
[09:17:05] <wm-bb>	 [telegram] <Ladsgroup> Thanks. It was a team effort of more than a year ^^ (re @Paulo_Darwin: @Ladsgroup congratulations, the logo looks great. I immediately liked the change 😁)
[09:21:13] <wm-bb>	 [telegram] <Ladsgroup> If anyone wants to clean old usages, it's used in a million places https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T268230
[09:23:00] <wm-bb>	 [telegram] <Tohaomg> Well, I see a strong resemblance: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/d/d2/BP_Helios_logo.svg
[09:39:46] <wm-bb>	 [telegram] <Ladsgroup> https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Project:Proposal_for_changing_logo_of_MediaWiki,_2020/Round_1#Comments_(6)
[09:39:54] <wm-bb>	 [telegram] <Ladsgroup> > Only to the extent any two stylized round flower logos would look similar.
[09:40:39] <wm-bb>	 [telegram] <Ladsgroup> Also, legal cleared it against all registered trademarks
[09:41:30] <wm-bb>	 [telegram] <Paulo_Darwin> It's very different from the BP one, indeed, mainly due to the much bigger hollow circle, which makes this one look like a cog-wheel
[09:42:38] <wm-bb>	 [telegram] <Paulo_Darwin> It's quite different from the BP one, indeed, mainly due to the much bigger hollow circle, which makes this one look like a cog-wheel
[10:15:35] <wm-bb>	 [telegram] <Thecladis> What was the process back with Wikivoyage? Was it also done and still resulted in the cease and desist letter  or it is actually a lesson learned from that to do that clearance? (re @Ladsgroup: Also, legal cleared it against all registered trademarks)
[10:31:06] <wm-bb>	 [telegram] <Ladsgroup> actually after the wikivoyage incident, they changed the process and that's why clearing is mandatory. Wikivoyage wasn't cleared by legal beforehand AFAIK
[10:37:48] <wm-bb>	 [telegram] <Ladsgroup> In general, comparing wikiovyage logo and mediawiki is not 100% correct, that logo REALLY looked like WTO logo
[10:56:22] <wm-bb>	 [telegram] <Jan_ainali> A literal million? (re @Ladsgroup: If anyone wants to clean old usages, it's used in a million places https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T268230)
[10:57:07] <wm-bb>	 [telegram] <Ladsgroup> depends on how you count :D, if old versions of mediawiki in the wild count, maybe
[11:01:16] <wm-bb>	 [telegram] <Ladsgroup> what is this :( https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:MediaWiki_administrator.svg
[11:16:44] <wm-bb>	 [telegram] <Thecladis> Dunno, for me that similarity was quite a stretch, the concept was similar, but look was quite different. But good to know it is now an updated process (re @Ladsgroup: In general, comparing wikiovyage logo and mediawiki is not 100% correct, that logo REALLY looked like WTO logo)
[11:18:29] <wm-bb>	 [telegram] <Thecladis> Picture for mww admins? (re @Ladsgroup: what is this :( https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:MediaWiki_administrator.svg)
[11:18:36] <wm-bb>	 [telegram] <Thecladis> (Picture for mww admins?) (re @Ladsgroup: what is this :( https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:MediaWiki_administrator.svg)
[12:56:30] <wm-bb>	 [telegram] <Paulo_Darwin> yes, that's the usual mop simbology
[13:27:26] <wm-bb>	 [telegram] <Ladsgroup> I know, it's just it looks really bad in large sized :D
[13:48:15] <wm-bb>	 [telegram] <Paulo_Darwin> horrific, indeed 😂