[08:29:34] <xSavitar>	 tgr_: I'll backport that today (the duplicate reads patch) so that we can have enough time to monitor and then enable on group2 next week.
[08:31:25] <xSavitar>	 I'll just wait for the train to get to group2 so I just do 1 backport for wmf.21
[09:49:15] <Lucas_WMDE>	 xSavitar: that sounds like a good way to cause problems if the train has to be rolled back after all ;)
[09:49:27] <Lucas_WMDE>	 IMHO it sounds better to backport to both branches
[09:49:34] <Lucas_WMDE>	 (but I don’t know the context of that specific change)
[09:50:52] <xSavitar>	 Lucas_WMDE, yeah! I thought a little about a train rollback. Maybe I should just do both, yes will do, thanks!
[09:51:14] <Lucas_WMDE>	 you can do it in the same deployment, shouldn’t be much more work
[09:51:17] <Lucas_WMDE>	 (unless there are git conflicts I guses)
[09:51:18] <Lucas_WMDE>	 thanks!
[09:51:20] <xSavitar>	 Yes!
[09:52:00] <xSavitar>	 To be on the safe side, I'll do both.
[09:52:50] <xSavitar>	 Lucas_WMDE, thanks for the deployer wise words 🙏🏽☺️
[10:15:31] <tgr_>	 xSavitar: are you going to group2 in the afternoon deploy window?
[10:25:07] <tgr_>	 nvm, I missed your comment above
[10:25:51] <tgr_>	 I'll bump JWTs to group 1 then (wanted to avoid having two different session-related rollouts in the same window)
[10:27:29] <xSavitar>	 tgr_, no I'm not going to group2. It's about the duplicate lookups, want to deploy those as well. Group2 will be for next week :)