[19:47:45] <MirahezeRelay>	 <koreirose> @CVT abbw probably https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/TheSun42GetsAzz
[20:02:31] <MirahezeRelay>	 <cacklettaguy1655> https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/User_talk:CrazySpruiker2001 What the hell is this?
[20:04:30] <MirahezeRelay>	 <koreirose, replying to cacklettaguy1655> Random page copied from a reception wiki
[20:04:34] <MirahezeRelay>	 <koreirose> I blanked the talk page out
[20:04:36] <MirahezeRelay>	 <.labster> Just some crazy spruiker, nothing to worry about
[20:05:31] <MirahezeRelay>	 <koreirose> CrazySpuriker is an admin on a lot of RWs
[20:05:41] <MirahezeRelay>	 <koreirose> I assume ABBW has an issue with them because they reverted her for vandalism or something
[20:06:35] <MirahezeRelay>	 <.labster> Why does AutoWikiBrowser hate her?
[20:06:59] <MirahezeRelay>	 <.labster> Oh, ABBW, not AWB
[20:07:40] <MirahezeRelay>	 <pixldev> Wonder if AWWB uses AWB to vandalize
[20:09:43] <MirahezeRelay>	 <.labster> Is this even worth locking?  I could see this as good faith user has no idea what they are doing.  Unlikely, but possible.
[20:13:09] <MirahezeRelay>	 <brandon.wm, replying to .labster> I can take a look if it helps?
[20:27:09] <MirahezeRelay>	 <reception123, replying to koreirose> where's the proof?
[20:27:17] <MirahezeRelay>	 <reception123> I'm not too familiar with ABBW so not sure
[20:28:37] <MirahezeRelay>	 <koreirose, replying to reception123> Well they're vandalizing the talk page of a prominent reception wiki admin, "gets azz" is a username policy violation, and many accounts that are CU confirmed to be her have mentioned TheSun42
[20:29:10] <MirahezeRelay>	 <brandon.wm> I’d do a CU to confirm but seems possible
[20:29:15] <MirahezeRelay>	 <koreirose> Yea
[20:29:23] <MirahezeRelay>	 <koreirose> Even if no CU results it's a UP violation
[20:30:11] <MirahezeRelay>	 <reception123, replying to koreirose> as Labster said, I wouldn't assume bad faith and vandalism immediately
[20:30:21] <MirahezeRelay>	 <koreirose> Oh I see
[20:30:24] <MirahezeRelay>	 <koreirose> That's fair
[20:30:25] <MirahezeRelay>	 <reception123, replying to brandon.wm> we can't have fishing expeditions and just assume everyone is a sock though
[20:30:35] <MirahezeRelay>	 <reception123> there has to be something at least resembling the supposed master account
[20:31:20] <MirahezeRelay>	 <reception123> as for the UP violation argument, I don't see it? CrazySpruiker2001 seems fine as a username?
[20:31:33] <MirahezeRelay>	 <reception123> oh sorry, you meant the sun guy
[20:32:06] <MirahezeRelay>	 <koreirose> [1/2] this applies
[20:32:06] <MirahezeRelay>	 <koreirose> [2/2] https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/443926951292567562/1222644337456844860/image.png?ex=6616f745&is=66048245&hm=5af20a9ead7b6b110cac6303ba0950115297622b1b9c5f04fe77c4b490f89ac5&
[20:32:12] <MirahezeRelay>	 <reception123> as for the UP argument, since the Sun is a registered user a warning will be in order
[20:32:26] <MirahezeRelay>	 <koreirose> Also "Cailou vandals" sounds a lot like this case given the replacing talk pages with the content of the Cailou article from a random RW
[20:32:28] <MirahezeRelay>	 <koreirose, replying to reception123> Alr
[20:32:42] <MirahezeRelay>	 <reception123> Oh, if @notaracham is aware of the background, let's let him look into it if he has time
[20:32:53] <MirahezeRelay>	 <reception123> I honestly have no knowledge of the background here
[20:38:21] <MirahezeRelay>	 <notaracham> This is extremely that Da$un vandal back again
[20:55:46] <MirahezeRelay>	 <raidarr> can second that it's absolutely dasun
[20:55:46] <MirahezeRelay>	 <koreirose> Who is Da$un?
[20:56:06] <MirahezeRelay>	 <raidarr> if it's not dasun then it doesn't matter because the pattern is identical and it is a copycat, ie, probably abbw and almost certainly an lta to strike regardless
[20:56:19] <MirahezeRelay>	 <raidarr> but dasun tends to be extremely obvious with a technical check
[21:07:00] <MirahezeRelay>	 <originalauthority, replying to koreirose> Da$un in the sky