[12:17:09] [[Special:CentralAuth/Anti-CVT crapping team]] @CVT No one has spotted this account. [12:17:09] https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/Special:CentralAuth/Anti-CVT_crapping_team [12:17:10] [12:18:04] Locked [12:18:14] Thanks. [12:34:52] @tali64 since you locked as LTA, who's the master here? [12:34:55] might be worth a CU [12:35:10] Page crapper from explain xkcd [12:35:34] oh wow, for a second there I didn't get that that was their actual username [12:35:41] will have a look just to confirm if there's any other accounts [12:37:26] https://cvt.miraheze.org/wiki/Abuse_registry/Neography_Vandals_AKA_%22Page_Crapper%22 https://cvt.miraheze.org/wiki/Abuse_registry/Page_crapper_from_explain_xkcd [12:37:30] hmm, even though NA locked in August it looks like the original account has been inactive [12:56:36] https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/Requests_for_Stewardship?diff=432519&oldid=407102&rcid=1412382 [12:56:53] Seriously? Now a stewardship request. [12:57:28] Revert and talk page prob [12:59:31] This comes just 10 mins after reception declined their Translator request [12:59:49] Oh that was them [13:00:15] They also have an open request for sysop rights [13:08:30] reception123: there also was https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/Meta:Requests_for_permissions#Fusionium_(Administrator) [13:09:36] Ah, it seems I conflicted with your oppose [13:09:58] for people who really have 0 edits before I really think there's no point to even entertaining them at all with a close but since there's already been two votes I'll just close the RfP [13:10:56] heh, and I conflicted with the first oppose [13:12:05] we've seen many CIR hat collectors but to request 3 permissions at once, that's a new one [13:12:44] when I rejected translator I didn't even look at his contributions tbh, the once sentence he wrote was enough to immediately decline [13:34:27] I thought that was closed [15:45:06] It was; MacFan said that before the RfP was closed [16:09:34] Additional vandal accounts pop up every few weeks/months [19:12:17] As a rule of thumb, if someone requests advanced permissions themselves, I suspect [[WP:HATSHOP]] from the start. Usually S, A, GA, IA are nominated by someone else. [19:12:17] https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/WP:HATSHOP [19:19:57] Interesting [19:20:44] On my RfGA jph opposed partly since I was nomed [19:20:45] Kinda [19:20:52] Activity as a WC was also a factor [19:22:23] Is that so? [19:23:16] I've always felt that nominations from others were like gifts because no one has to do it for you but they do so out of courtesy because they like you [19:41:03] I agree with Felenov [19:47:00] I'm trying to recall, but I think I self-nominated for most of mine... [19:47:37] At least WC and IA [19:49:54] Ah yep, GS and S were both noms, but WC and IA were only requested after consultation with other to ensure I was up to the challenge.