[04:33:54] Me too dumb to understand. [05:27:42] <__lone_wolf__> am i doing something wrong or cant i link to an outside image for my userpage (to use as profile picture in some kind of bio)? [05:35:26] on wiki? [05:36:52] [1/3] external images aren't a thing here, generally discouraged too [05:36:53] [2/3] upload on wiki from external is a thing tho [05:36:53] [3/3] there's a white list of allowed resources to work as embeds etc, like discord, soundcloud [05:40:52] <__lone_wolf__, replying to theoneandonlylegroom> [1/2] ok, just wanted to avoid to have a private picture for my bio page to be listed among the wiki files. [05:40:52] <__lone_wolf__, replying to theoneandonlylegroom> [2/2] tnc for the info.. [06:10:01] Privat pictures shouldn't ever be uploaded, if you do not want others to see them [06:20:05] surprised that CA seems to be asleep rn [06:32:53] <__lone_wolf__, replying to rodejong> [1/2] define private, its basicly still part of it [06:32:54] <__lone_wolf__, replying to rodejong> [2/2] https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/615786602454581249/1350356060841574470/image.png?ex=67d67095&is=67d51f15&hm=fbf69521d3e53dc2a8f7586fa4991c11bc407d2a6aec0e26c5eaae153876b033& [06:35:58] I mean it's still five boosts can you really complain [07:05:32] yes actually [07:06:09] that’s a sign that someone likely used a service to boost the server, which is against ToS and can get the server banned if an admin did it sometimes (if I’m not mistaken) [07:08:57] like unauthorized bots? [08:34:17] yeah, iirc you can request any server to be boosted with one of those services, you don’t need to own it [08:34:46] and then they send in a bunch of bots with questionably obtained nitro to boost it for you and I suppose that’s cheaper than just doing it yourself(?) [08:35:47] I can't imagine anyone here cares enough or has any reason to do that, though maybe that's my bone against nitro showing [08:35:55] at least on staff [11:00:46] Hi claire [11:25:14] I am meaning pictures of yourself, your loved ones, etc. [11:33:03] <__lone_wolf__, replying to rodejong> Yeah, ofcourse 😉 (just realised i'm in the offtopic channel??? oeps) [11:37:19] We don't have the evidende and hey at least we have 14 boosts now [11:42:40] No worries. [12:33:49] Huh https://pdfengine.dev/ [12:33:56] Wake up babe new fun shit just dropped [13:16:50] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a2EgfkhC1eo the 90s AT&T commercials hit different [15:35:27] https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/615786602454581249/1350492600842588222/bafkreidz5hwwtadeeispgmfnhohrwbmlmtbtayqhlfovt7ogltd4lfxleajpeg.png?ex=67d6efbe&is=67d59e3e&hm=fcaa551fa0607585ce3876d7859b7f8e9827382b857f2262b8a9e6374cf7f034& [15:35:36] June 27th... [16:57:45] I hate Firefox, their Android version broke extensions [18:23:19] Try Fennec maybe? Idk if it's on Google Play but it is on F-droid.. [18:23:41] that's what I use and extensions seem to work ok there [18:30:02] tho, switching browsers does suck tbh... [18:30:18] esp over something like this that Really Should work [20:38:23] odd stuff is why I don't really build around/depend on boosts tbh, the levels come and go [20:38:41] except if the level is met with excess to a degree any one person or a few leaving would not affect it [21:46:22] yea [21:47:26] role icons are nice to have, and if we could consistently stay far above the level to sustain them I’d love to remove either the icon or color from mods so we can display both our on wiki role and discord one [21:47:34] ie GA purple with the scale [22:33:17] Well, it's Firefox, Mozilla probably did yet another Mozilla [22:35:58] ironfox and brave are pretty much the only options for me at this point [22:36:05] might try cromite [22:37:27] Brave is a hard no from me [22:38:11] I’ve seen https://www.spacebar.news/stop-using-brave-browser/ passed around [22:38:15] I am weary of what they might try to do in updates but could care less about the ceo [22:38:26] as always take check the citations [22:38:33] at this point it's hardly worse than straight firefox [22:38:39] the replacing add thing is also blah [22:38:52] ironfox is where I'd mostly bet except that's pretty much a one man show [22:38:53] Hmmmmm [22:38:59] so there's not really any good/great options for mobile at all [22:39:01] a bit i think [22:39:13] but still cromite isn't one I've looked at close enough [22:39:23] im using Zen but it’s computer [22:39:42] zen for me is just weird straight firefox in trust and capabilities [22:40:08] really librewolf is everything I want from firefox out of the box but waterfox is okay at that task too [22:40:19] I like the side task thing a lot [22:40:31] The glance feature is also super useful [22:40:36] especially in patrolling [22:40:37] I have not bought into attempts to redefine tabs so that's probably where I diverge [22:41:05] plus the workspaces are great for me who has ADH oh look a butterfly [22:41:07] I'd rather relatively dead simple but still renders as you might expect... with robust content blocking and no BS in the background [22:41:32] Laughs in gradient support [22:42:05] the idea that vivaldi is a top pick as alternative to brave is, nah [22:42:56] worst content blocking on market (that I'd look at anyway), tries to be a swiss army knife and does not sell me, auditability is worse with aspects still source locked, can't say I have much more inherent trust in them, not confident of their robustness [22:43:12] and again, recommending straight firefox is increasingly difficult for me anymore [22:43:15] Oh god I would never touch that garbage (Brave) in my life [22:43:44] I do get sussed out by it but would run it in its own little corner without qualms if a chrome base is needed as it occasionally is [22:44:12] I don't trust it much less than windows I'll put it that way and I still whip windows to run for its jobs [22:44:19] I trust base chromium more than Brave [22:44:43] ungoogled chromium with enough work I'd take but not a deal that's really worth it for me [22:44:58] Over Brave ? [22:45:00] ungoogled chromium? [22:45:10] Chromium with patches to remove some Google crap [22:45:21] I know what it is [22:45:23] plus enough extension support to block standard internet BS [22:45:24] Ah [22:45:26] was suggesting in reply [22:45:44] Ah I missed that u didn't reply to the message right above mine ahah [22:45:47] beat you by a few messages [22:46:07] I am kinda annoyed that LibreWolf lacks a proper flatpak [22:46:18] Also, do they have an Android build [22:46:28] Like [22:46:29] nope [22:46:30] Of Android FF [22:46:31] Huh [22:46:36] ironfox is your closest bet [22:46:51] successor to mull [22:47:08] Is https://flathub.org/apps/io.gitlab.librewolf-community not the official one? [22:47:17] oh it says community huh [22:47:20] Seems pretty new still hmm [22:47:23] Yep [22:47:28] It also links to an old GitLab [22:47:33] Doesn't pass my standards [22:47:40] fair enough [22:47:48] I will probably build from source [22:47:58] After all, I run a manual build of FF already [22:48:09] With some patches [22:48:14] I don't usually like to go with new shit but it has enough carried over from mull that I give it a shot [22:48:30] and the market is really really bad for mobile browsers anyway [22:48:37] Do we have a WebKit one [22:49:00] someone swore by the gnome one the other day, I hate gnome on principle so never gave it a fair shake but maybe that's an option [22:49:01] [1/2] I'm excited for Servo to get usable [22:49:02] [2/2] -# in like 10-ish years 🫠 [22:49:05] WPE will probably run on phones running fdo [22:49:23] I don't like Servo that much, it's a frankenstein monster of C++ Firefox components with Rust stuff [22:49:33] epiphany, that's what they're called; don't think it's on mobile [22:49:35] Epiphany ? [22:49:43] Yea that one is just a frontend for WebKitGTK [22:49:45] well, gnome web I think is the proper name [22:49:50] Ah [22:49:52] I never got it to work [22:49:55] yeah, there's not a lot to it [22:50:16] I dismiss it but again, someone swore by it one time on one of the linux servers so I guess I'll give a passing thought [22:50:32] [1/2] I am gonna be attempting to apply to Igalia so maybe I will get to work on that haha [22:50:33] [2/2] GFX has no open positions so I will be applying to smth I have no exp with [22:50:36] But who knows [22:50:51] then there's ladybird which I hope doesn't end up like reactos [22:50:56] Fuck LadyBird [22:50:56] @alu19_ Watch your language. [22:51:00] No [22:51:03] english [22:51:06] carry on [22:51:21] LadyBird is lead by an openly queerphobic fascist [22:51:26] I want nowhere near that [22:51:28] I can't see anything serious on market tbh [22:51:39] I will be trying to play with the existing browser engines [22:51:46] Have my eyes set on WebKit [22:52:02] Making my own port [22:52:07] On top of my platform [22:52:19] (unhelpful) ||`curl` is the way to go :smug: /j|| [22:52:19] With built-in support for ublock lists [22:52:21] I can make a chromium derivative work if I have to, settle with firefox one step removed, and have not at all considered webkit things because I am allergic to apple [22:52:35] Shame on you, links2 is 1000 times better!!! [22:52:50] who isn't hacking netscape into shape, smh [22:52:54] I mean... [22:53:00] Apple is not really like [22:53:03] The core devs of WebKiot [22:53:14] any more than android is straight google [22:53:23] ? [22:53:24] I know of no serious option not tied at the hip regardless [22:53:38] Wait like 20 years for me to write a browser x3 [22:53:45] okie dokie [22:54:06] The biggest problem with writing a browser is making it fast and making it secure [22:54:33] only way to get anywhere I imagine is the qubes mentality of keep it slim, build on existing stuff where possible and get it right from the outset [22:54:45] Haha, I am the opposite of that [22:54:49] I like Qubes tho [22:54:54] well, it'll be fun regardless ei [22:54:56] Cuz my friend is one of their core devs [22:55:03] that's neat [22:55:06] Yea [22:55:21] They showed interest in me rewriting Linux in Rust [22:55:21] I've had pain with it but it's the only OS that thinks the way I want it to think [22:55:33] That's good [22:55:51] We disagree on how to implement secure graphics accel [22:55:53] it's insane to me how much trust goes on random crap from the internet not demolishing your drive [22:56:10] Haha yea [22:56:22] The OS I am writing [22:56:29] Is kinda like, well [22:56:34] I am not doing VMs [22:56:42] But I am doing the principle of least priviledge [22:56:48] that's a start at least [22:56:52] :p [22:57:18] Everything runs in userspace (including drivers), apps need to explicitly declare their perms, and Linux apps run over a compatibility layer in an emulated env that doesn't have access to anything it wasn't granted access to [22:57:19] when I've riced qubes nicely I'll report back eventually [22:57:36] around the time I get it to consistently not be like win 3.1 [22:57:46] mixed with modern web buttons etc [22:57:57] Windows XP when [22:58:06] xp theme why not [22:58:07] Im getting real tired of not being to do jack shit out of home so im considering if I don’t just try and find a subdomain provider my school hasn’t blocked and buying a contaboo box and setting up a server with stuff to get stuff done [22:58:14] I'd take a vista theme though [22:58:15] Bout to fucking snap [22:58:36] Haha [22:58:50] Can i just run a fedora desktop environment in the browser actually [22:58:53] 🧐 [22:58:56] Well [22:58:56] Kind of [22:58:57] no like legitimately [22:59:02] sure [22:59:06] Blame the W3C [22:59:13] depending on the how part [22:59:21] Well [22:59:26] Do you want to connect [22:59:27] Running a linux DE in the browser of my evil shit linux laptop [22:59:30] Or you want it to run in the browser [22:59:36] Connect [22:59:43] connect is easy I daresay [22:59:54] Ah [22:59:56] This is a spyware filled evil locked down school Chromebook [23:00:03] Jailbreak it [23:00:21] my final words before I realized my chromebooks were arms [23:00:35] Sadly I am a good student and don’t want to piss off my school around college application season [23:00:40] Ah [23:00:43] I am an evil student [23:00:52] Schools hate me [23:00:58] Teachers like me tho, if they are decnet [23:01:08] So at most schools I had 2-3 teachers that liked me [23:01:08] Mine doesn’t and I’d like to keep it that way for long as possible [23:01:30] I used to be my middle schools guidance counselors dedicated IT guy [23:01:37] Eehe cute [23:01:39] got paid in cookies [23:01:43] Ehehehehehehe [23:01:53] Got a certificate at the end of middle school [23:02:07] That's kinda cool [23:02:19] My middle school just screamed at me how dare I hurt the teacher's ego when I offered to provide IT help [23:02:50] IIRC I helped one of the departing vice principals download her email data so others could access when she left [23:03:00] I will now stop remembering my middle school now before I have a panic attack, I have legit PTSD from that place [23:03:15] :o [23:08:16] https://www.linuxserver.io/blog/2021-05-05-meet-webtops-a-linux-desktop-environment-in-your-browser [23:08:18] 🧐 [23:08:30] let me see if obl.ong’s domain is blocked [23:09:21] Someday I should develop something like that [23:09:23] Problem is [23:09:29] Today's apps are not optimized to work over that [23:09:36] We had X11 for that [23:09:38] It worked great [23:09:54] Now everything on X11 uses DRI2/3 and Wayland is a no-starter [23:32:04] well if you have a domain name [23:32:28] i legit spent 5 minutes trying domains on the first page of https://freedns.afraid.org/zc.php?from=L3N1YmRvbWFpbi9lZGl0LnBocD9lZGl0X2RvbWFpbl9pZD0yNjQ5MDk= [23:32:33] all get sniped [23:53:59] > Shame on you, links2 is 1000 times better!!! [23:54:05] alu19_: consixer [23:54:08] oops [23:54:13] consider wget-at x3 [23:55:36] > Can i just run a fedora desktop environment in the browser actually [23:55:40] pixldev: novnc? [23:56:25] novnc? [23:56:57] https://novnc.com/info.html [23:57:02] Miau ? [23:57:16] (dunno what you're replying to) [23:57:52] Miau? [23:57:55] Wdym [23:58:09] It's Sunday what are you doing on IRC [23:58:13] Or is it Monday for u [23:58:23] Wait [23:58:27] It can't be Monday [23:58:50] That'd make the TZ +32h [23:58:56] And that's nonsens [23:59:36] could work [23:59:39] but i need like [23:59:42] a domain [23:59:59] is sharkgirling blocked?