[03:17:03] <MirahezeRelay>	 <cascalade> Wheres the link to blame it all on caching
[03:21:06] <MirahezeRelay>	 <pskyechology, replying to cascalade> https://shouldiblamecach.ing/
[03:45:49] <MirahezeRelay>	 <max20091, replying to amelialoveheart> Either using TabberNeue or having a list of issue + ToC
[03:46:29] <MirahezeRelay>	 <max20091> I would prefer the second option given the first one is usually quite problematic
[03:48:08] <MirahezeRelay>	 <max20091> Tabber is good if you have like 2-3 buttons
[03:50:11] <MirahezeRelay>	 <max20091> If you have 5+ buttons, the tabber will become a burden especially on phones as buttons were hidden due to not enough width
[04:03:02] <MirahezeRelay>	 <bartomelow> Yahoo! mails are something
[04:10:52] <MirahezeRelay>	 <ext_> I wonder how tabber handles cargo
[08:30:59] <MirahezeRelay>	 <raidarr, replying to bartomelow> still is, with some discipline
[08:31:51] <MirahezeRelay>	 <raidarr> like the period of nostalgia the video invokes, what it is today is pretty circumstantial in the first place and I'll grant it may not be entirely possible to use it that way now, but there's a good chance you could still give it a shot
[09:28:28] <MirahezeRelay>	 <kai84, replying to bartomelow> dont get me started
[09:28:47] <MirahezeRelay>	 <kai84> all the time at work i am "fixing" emails for old people (they dont know their password)
[09:29:03] <MirahezeRelay>	 <kai84> it it's anything BUT gmail i tell them to contact their email provider
[09:32:49] <MirahezeRelay>	 <kai84> ESPECIALLY outlooks sucks the most
[09:50:13] <MirahezeRelay>	 <sakurababochka> As an outlook user, I agree with this statement.
[09:51:11] <MirahezeRelay>	 <kai84> switch immediately
[09:51:59] <MirahezeRelay>	 <kai84> outlook accounts r so unrecoverable its ridiculous
[09:53:14] <MirahezeRelay>	 <sakurababochka> Organisation-standard emails can't be switched, unfortunately.
[09:53:46] <MirahezeRelay>	 <sakurababochka> My personal isn't outlook because I have control over that one.
[11:50:25] <MirahezeRelay>	 <thewwrnerdguy, replying to ext_> ... exactly the same as it handles any other extension???