[02:05:57] <.labster> Honestly the color looks bad on darkmode [02:06:07] <.labster> https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1006789349498699827/1209682434833260604/image.png?ex=65e7cf8f&is=65d55a8f&hm=c108939757412cb91f6cc4f9384695974e075e74025915d9b8538d46793860ff& [02:15:44] I've been using dark mode forever and I think it looks fine [02:15:54] unless you mean bad as in badass [02:17:12] my sight is a bit dodo but I do agree both the mod and admin colors are on the iffy side for dark mode [02:27:40] While the reds aren't the best colors, you really don't have a lot of options for role colors on discord sadly, so you often have to just work with what you got [02:28:35] [1/2] what about: [02:28:35] [2/2] https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1006789349498699827/1209688087719051374/Vcx3C0B.png?ex=65e7d4d3&is=65d55fd3&hm=964b79436515a03e4b985da8cf1ff06d397b922e975731b3e2aabc88f9d3c481& [02:28:36] lol [12:12:28] You actually can choose custom colors by hex code. But agreed that making them look good on bith light and dark mode can be tricky [12:13:59] It doesn't help that mobile now has a darker background than everything [18:56:27] . [19:13:10] I’m starting to think Special:RandomWiki is programmed to basically only show deleted or inactive wikis [19:13:37] It’s absurd [19:14:22] the issue is that like 50% of wikis are inactive [19:14:39] It was well more then 50 percent [19:14:59] 2959 closed wikis, 1801 deleted wikis and 564 inactive wikis [19:15:38] out of 8835 wikis, 3511 are active? [19:15:41] huh [19:17:10] Huh [19:17:22] 1801 deleted are not counted anymore in the 8835, I fixed that. [19:17:28] Are deleted included in the- [19:17:31] ah [19:17:33] Never mind [19:17:36] There are 10636 total wikis [19:17:37] :Kek: [19:17:53] yeah so 5312 active wikis [19:17:58] so yes, half \:P [19:18:05] Huh [19:18:22] Actually that just supports my conspiracy theory [19:18:23] Yeah that doesn't change stats much lol [19:18:41] Cause like 90% had the inactive banner [19:18:49] A good amount were deleted [19:19:08] Speaking of which I think labster has a PR to fix that [19:19:13] Iirc [19:19:38] Oh thanks for the review reminder [19:21:38] I just realized testing on beta where there arent many wikis total and I keep getting the same one may not be the best way to test lol [19:37:45] Always test on prod :Kek: [19:38:22] Also may be worth noting I got sent to the same deleted with at least twice [19:47:38] Out of how big of a sample? [19:47:48] Idk i clicked a lot [19:47:54] I’d say low double digits [19:49:02] So small sample size, anything less than at least a hundred (and even then that would be a bit lowish), is not near enough to be considered a valid sample size to infer anything from [19:49:37] It’s not enough to generate a statistic [19:49:45] I’d say it’s enough to notice a trend [19:51:24] No it is not, randomness is streaky, even 10-15+ in a row is entirely possible in a truely random sample size, specailly when we are talking 2 states only (inactive, or active) [19:53:08] Also did you actually write down each time you got an active and an inactive to actually count? If not confirmation bias could very well be in play. We humans tend to notice and remember negative results (which would be the inactive wiki's in this case), FAR more than positive [19:55:23] Touche [19:57:34] <.labster, replying to cosmicalpha> At least it seems to not die, that’s nice [20:05:47] Tends to be [20:24:50] And they all show up in Random Wiki? (except for deleted wiki's ofcourse) [20:30:18] The issue is deleted wikis do show up in RW [20:35:43] <.labster> My PR should have fixed that