[05:14:28] Found a small bug from my code... Expect an update to UPV2 regarding the edit counter soon [05:14:46] [08:39:37] @rhinosf1 (or anyone else really), can you make this sound better: "This wiki is migrating from or forking an existing wiki"? [08:39:41] it sounds a bit odd to me [08:39:54] is there a nicer way to ask basically whether a wiki is either migration from another existing wiki or if they're forking an existing wiki? [08:40:59] I thought it's said "forking from" [08:41:28] that would make "... moving or forking from ..." [08:41:31] idk [08:44:47] moving works yeah, we don't have to say migrating [17:01:50] Anyone going insane getting logged out every time they visit a new wiki [17:02:06] yup [17:02:12] Krill me [17:02:26] although I'm trying to open "new" wikis in incignito [17:02:38] but I often forget [17:39:00] Yeah I usually try to use incognito so they don't all get added to my CA [17:39:06] But indeed I also do forget sometimes [17:41:26] heh yeah 1221 attached accounts [17:47:41] !log reboot for kernal upgrade [17:47:50] oops wrong channel [17:47:53] Wrong channel [20:06:56] [1/2] https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/Special:RequestWikiQueue/50204#mw-section-comments [20:06:56] [2/2] It seems this Wiki doesn't want to be created. [20:07:46] See also : https://discord.com/channels/407504499280707585/1295079939975942144 [20:08:04] CA manually created it per #general [20:08:24] might close this thread as resolved [20:10:58] Thanks for that. Marked it for closing [20:11:30] CA is investigating now I think [20:14:51] [1/2] *Why is the approval rating back? [20:14:52] [2/2] *Why is the comment section in reversed order (Newest first and older under that?) [20:15:14] Is it?(to the second part) [20:15:31] Take a look at the link above [20:15:47] To the first I think we’re tentatively poking it around to see if it’s worth going back to the idea [20:15:58] @reception123 [20:16:18] Huh [20:16:31] @cosmicalpha was that an intentional part of the rewrite [20:17:42] Right now wiki creations should be paused. It doesn't want ro work. [20:18:00] The question is about: *Why is the comment section in reversed order (Newest first and older under that?) [20:18:01] As for the comments newest has always been first [20:18:07] Nope [20:18:24] I could be wrong but I am almost certain lol [20:18:26] It went always as oldest above, and newest under [20:18:58] I will confirm by looking at old code. If I am wrong will restore prior behavior. [20:19:10] 👍🏻 [20:19:28] Nah I’m with Ro here [20:19:33] I am busy trying to fix CW at all right now. [20:19:40] Fair [20:19:48] No worries [20:19:54] Just wondering