[00:48:45] recreating previously deleted modules is a bit sus... https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Sanderpel713 [01:26:46] Hmmmm [01:26:49] Interesting [08:08:03] @thewwrnerdguy wrnerdguy [13:54:03] anyways since my request was closed, i wonder if is there anything to improve on how to handle requests better, hopefully my responses were fine https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/Meta:Requests_for_permissions?markasread=708038&markasreadwiki=metawiki#c-NotAracham-20260221181500-Fearlessak47_(Wiki_reviewer) [13:55:07] [1/2] I wonder can whoever just adds the questions for the candidate [13:55:07] [2/2] https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1225560610628964423/1475491165385003182/4E7CA39C-5FD8-45AB-AE7B-419CA5807734.png?ex=699dadbb&is=699c5c3b&hm=6ae1fb02d2f988e35f9ad564bdf9bd49f0d7513617cffabb1ba8686c2a000af3& [13:55:47] yes [13:56:01] i'll add some cause why not [14:56:59] @_arawynn you've got more mail [14:59:32] ngl maybe i could've brought some better examples, but i hope this was fine [14:59:34] hopefully my examples weren't horrid [15:45:17] I [changed the formatting](https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/Special:Diff/521574) a little bit, feel free to revert if you don't like the changes [15:47:16] Looks nice, thanks [15:58:58] policy idea: forbid crap like this https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/User:Nath230444 [16:00:17] what do you mean crap like this? [16:00:24] what's not already forbidden by policy? [16:02:57] using our somewhat alright SEO for advertising, themselves in this case [16:03:24] not against any official policy but still deleted [16:03:34] https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/User:Zppix/User_space_policy [16:05:01] oh hey nath here is on loginwiki instead and i work as the janitor there [16:05:48] haha I was just trying to put {{delete}} on their page but then abusefilter stopped me [16:05:49]

[16:06:41] is there some way to make all loginwiki pages non-indexable [16:07:00] or would there have to be `NOINDEX` added to them all [16:07:41] im fairly certain it already is but checking [16:08:32] oh huh noindex is not set for the user namespace on loginwiki [16:08:44] tbf i didnt get search results of my page on loginwiki, only on meta [16:13:35] hmm I should check if noindex propagates through GUP but cant be bothered rn [16:14:11] but yeah the loginwiki pages themselves dont seem to get picked up by SEs at all [16:17:54] just scrolled through 10 pages of google results for my username and my gup didn't show up [16:18:03] although tbf my gup is like 5 sentences [16:18:18] there were a few SocialProfile user pages though [16:30:16] [1/3] hi there! im new to miraheze and representing a pokemon fangame. i made a request for a wiki yesterday, and got a reply from the AI that the request will need to be put under manual review because of the mature themes present in the game. [16:30:16] [2/3] the game is quite long as it is, and i wouldn't want to task someone that doesn't have interest in it to play through to look for examples of the mature themes listed in the disclaimer at the start of the game. i was wondering if i should prepare some examples of said themes (NONE are sexually explicit, there is no nudity in the game at all.) for when a volunteer is able to view [16:30:17] [3/3] the request? [16:32:59] No reviewer is going to go through and play a game to verify content in a wiki request [16:33:01] i think the most useful information (i'm not a reviewer mind you) you can give is how you would handle some of those themes [16:33:42] ^ [16:33:43] Just putting info clarifying what’s in the game and how it will be approached should be fine [16:34:18] is it ok to post what i wrote for the request in here to see if it's clear enough? [16:46:15] Yes but please spoiler anything NSFW [16:49:21] [1/3] here's the main request: https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/Special:RequestWikiQueue/75675#mw-section-details [16:49:21] [2/3] In the NSFW description section (not sure if it's public or not): [16:49:21] [3/3] ||The game does not have sexually explicit content, but there are topics covered that fall under the NSFW category. Here is the disclaimer from the game: "The story contains elements of mature topics such as abuse, assault, murder, and crippling poverty. Adults, children, and animals may suffer the aforementioned."|| [16:50:33] there is no graphic violence depicted in the game in images, but it is mentioned in dialogue. we do not plan to depict anything besides minor injuries or some blood (no intense gore) [17:25:00] <_arawynn, replying to justanotherdarkmodeuser> I really like that kind of mail 🥰 [17:33:55] Enjoy taking time to answer them [17:34:06] Though I kind of made em too easy [17:34:25] Still it would be fascinating to see what you think [17:35:03] <_arawynn> I'm reading them over right now for a first impression, it might take a bit of time to answer them [18:02:18] [1/2] Hmm, what do you think about it, been half an hour [18:02:19] [2/2] No need to answer ofc just curious [18:04:22] <_arawynn> it's a good mix, some are quite clear to answer, others need a bit more evaluation but nothing that I'd consider extremely difficult [19:00:17] Most of them look good, though I'll drop my comment later [19:00:36] <_arawynn> sure, I just got them done [19:00:58] But I'm confident you won't have competency issues aside from one problem [19:01:42] The only bad thing I would have to say is the one person wiki: there have been wikis about artists before as I have seen [19:01:50] Lemme try to pull something up [19:05:24] https://discord.com/channels/407504499280707585/615786602454581249/1471190626685948178 [19:05:26] Around here [19:05:42] I'm pretty sure wikis about artists and their work is allowed @_arawynn [19:06:21] And I believe the artist example I pulled up here should be fine to accept, tho a steward can tell me otherwise [19:08:01] <_arawynn> definitely worth considering, I've been purely basing it on the Vanity Wiki thing [20:33:50] [1/2] thank you for this very useful help page [20:33:51] [2/2] https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1225560610628964423/1475591506487148654/image.png?ex=699e0b2e&is=699cb9ae&hm=1a565f8bfb68bcd32923ccc6c648eccfe14ac501ef04fab899be708bfe8fc240& [20:39:58] In fairness, it is a question we get a lot [20:40:06] But yeah, worthy of a stub assignment [20:42:13] ah so it's some sort of Frequently Asked Question? [20:42:19] we should make a page for those [20:44:33] Anyway I'm gonna make a Community Portal post about some of the most egregious of these. Some of them could just be redirects to the FAQs page [20:47:12] How to guides are intended as exactly that - a link for how to do frequently asked things. [20:47:28] I think the category page for that category was framed as a landing page, but there might be another one on meta [20:47:53] But yes, since literally anyone can make them, cleanup is probably in order [20:56:48] [1/2] https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/Community_portal#c-TheWWRNerdGuy-20260223205500-Removal/expansion/redirecting_of_stub_help_pages? [20:56:48] [2/2] Collected a few of the help pages with very little detail or reason they couldn't be on a larger page. would like to see others' thoughts on this [20:57:09] or should it be on Meta:Community portal? [21:08:16] Seems fine where you put it [21:20:52] +1