[00:44:19] <MirahezeRelay>	 <pixldev> hot take abolish the concept of titles and revert to just doing stuff on consensus (not saying I fully support or think this is a good idea)
[00:56:22] <MirahezeRelay>	 <posix_memalign> I like Raidarr's and Pix's idea. We had this tradition for a long time but it is too inflexible. With that said I'm a bit concerned about publicly deliberating on multiple volunteer nominations. These are done a lot on requests for permissions, but having multiple people run for the same position is a bit different.
[00:57:56] <MirahezeRelay>	 <pixldev, replying to posix_memalign> What do you mean volunteer moms
[00:58:04] <MirahezeRelay>	 <pixldev> Like MotM?
[01:00:46] <MirahezeRelay>	 <crystalite13, replying to posix_memalign> Yeah, though I think we could shift towards highly active or just even appreciated volunteers
[01:00:48] <MirahezeRelay>	 <posix_memalign> Oh I see I misunderstood. So MM _articles_ would be written based on consensus.
[01:12:10] <MirahezeRelay>	 <posix_memalign> [1/3] There isn't much of a point to current titles except for:
[01:12:10] <MirahezeRelay>	 <posix_memalign> [2/3] 1. Being able to publish the issue which is currently done by myself.
[01:12:11] <MirahezeRelay>	 <posix_memalign> [3/3] 2. Being able to add new/remove content during drafting. A lot of this is done by myself unilaterally. The "Keeping your votes secret in the board election" column in April was only discussed in private servers for feedback. For future issues we could slow things down and start big changes here first.
[02:06:59] <MirahezeRelay>	 <crystalite13, replying to posix_memalign> And also the fact that the lead editor role didnt really exist until like a week ago
[02:07:15] <MirahezeRelay>	 <crystalite13> So I get a role for lil ole me 🙂
[09:43:43] <MirahezeRelay>	 <raidarr> editor being supervisory in nature is the real 'power'  involved so that being potentially elected would be interesting
[09:44:29] <MirahezeRelay>	 <raidarr> it could make an unprecedented use of meta rfp for positions that exist beyond official policy (or one could be made for integration)
[09:45:04] <MirahezeRelay>	 <raidarr> I think keeping the actual issue content and who can add/remove with editor supervision flexible is best until some issue comes up and editors could rule or there is an rff style discussion about it
[09:45:29] <MirahezeRelay>	 <raidarr> order of preference being the newer you are the more conservative you should be with major changes without discussion