[17:44:59] <MirahezeRelay>	 <ihalo> [1/4] https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1225560610628964423/1509613471015108638/IMG_3330.jpg?ex=6a19d09a&is=6a187f1a&hm=8a297cdab5a1357b0afbf5728219bbae49bf2e1710deef6e9b424221b3151173&
[17:44:59] <MirahezeRelay>	 <ihalo> [2/4] https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1225560610628964423/1509613471346720901/IMG-20260513-WA3592.jpg?ex=6a19d09a&is=6a187f1a&hm=1f630b59aacc8fbab0293f80323a5bd6e61924ebefc396e76b64d3266b712d0c&
[17:45:00] <MirahezeRelay>	 <ihalo> [3/4] https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1225560610628964423/1509613471753441440/DSC_2913.jpg?ex=6a19d09a&is=6a187f1a&hm=72cf0164d38eaa1c5a449fecb254032be76a2b8b820612bd677cceb5beaef9c1&
[17:45:00] <MirahezeRelay>	 <ihalo> [4/4] https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1225560610628964423/1509613472198168586/IMG-20260428-WA4614.jpg?ex=6a19d09b&is=6a187f1b&hm=cbbfa971ee78198bd196928e8daafdbf90b0f0b4489cc1f7f5db983526ddf719&
[17:56:51] <MirahezeRelay>	 <raidarr> [1/2] if there is someone interested in the process of stewarding, I believe I have nibbled the [[Steward requests]] board down to items that require additional checking and processing, and will tackle some other things after chewing quick actions on the reopening board. It might be a good opportunity for someone interested to share what they think might be the process, ask questions, or o
[17:56:51] <MirahezeRelay>	 <raidarr> [2/2] therwise collaborate as a couple I will have to bounce for a second opinion anyway. I'm on ish for several hours though reply time may not be instant
[17:56:52] <MirahezeRelay>	 <Wiki-Bot#2998> <https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/Steward_requests>
[18:12:32] <MirahezeRelay>	 <raidarr> btw @crystalite13, <https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/Steward_requests/Requests_for_reopening_wikis#desciclopedia.miraheze.org> would appear to relate to <https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/Special:RequestWikiQueue/81313>. This won't be overturned so I'm only waiting for a response from somewhere else before giving them a final answer
[18:50:07] <MirahezeRelay>	 <thewwrnerdguy> [1/2] https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/Steward_requests/Requests_for_reopening_wikis#c-KENNY_STEWART_6284-20260525161700-amazingyoutubers.miraheze.org seems like a no based on FNFGamer's comment
[18:50:07] <MirahezeRelay>	 <thewwrnerdguy> [2/2] https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/Steward_requests/Requests_for_reopening_wikis#c-Sootsyman-20260521095000-rootsenglish.miraheze.org seems to be the old version of https://anglisc.miraheze.org , so would that be a no based on the rules around wiki forks?
[19:09:52] <MirahezeRelay>	 <thewwrnerdguy> [1/6] for the permissions ones:
[19:09:52] <MirahezeRelay>	 <thewwrnerdguy> [2/6] - <https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/Steward_requests/Permissions#c-%E6%B9%AF%E5%B4%A9%E6%AD%A3%E6%B5%B7-20260526005400-%E6%B9%AF%E5%B4%A9%E6%AD%A3%E6%B5%B7@wikitriviawiki>: this wiki seems very inactive, no other users have made any contributions since january although the user in question has only made 2 edits and they were in March. The wiki also appears to have quite a bit of 
[19:09:52] <MirahezeRelay>	 <thewwrnerdguy> [3/6] history, so I'm thinking a local election might be needed first before proceeding.
[19:09:53] <MirahezeRelay>	 <thewwrnerdguy> [4/6] - <https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/Steward_requests/Permissions#c-Mentalsunfish-20260527101700-Mentalsunfish@darkexplorationrecordswiki>: seems like the founders changed a few settings then forgot the wiki existed so I'd say that's a clear-cut case. The wiki was created in March so it's been longer than 60 days.
[19:09:53] <MirahezeRelay>	 <thewwrnerdguy> [5/6] - <https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/Steward_requests/Permissions#c-와우게임즈-20260523115000-와우게임즈@miraewiki>: would this be one better-suited to SR/RW? The wiki also seems to be eligible for DPE.
[19:09:53] <MirahezeRelay>	 <thewwrnerdguy> [6/6] - <https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/Steward_requests/Permissions#c-Bartomelow-20260527023700-Bartomelow@fwtdwiki>: can this one even be actioned?
[21:43:15] <MirahezeRelay>	 <crystalite13, replying to raidarr> Alright
[22:48:59] <MirahezeRelay>	 <raidarr, replying to thewwrnerdguy> 1's pretty straightforward, 2 is a good observation I'd have almost certainly missed; the spirit of forking policy would suggest strongly recommending they consider the living project instead unless there is a good argument to bear for making the distinction
[22:53:35] <MirahezeRelay>	 <thewwrnerdguy, replying to raidarr> For the second one I looked at Special:Stats and noticed a whole load of edits and very few pages, so I checked the deletion log and found that many pages were deleted by the last admin as they were moving to a new miraheze wiki
[22:54:13] <MirahezeRelay>	 <raidarr, replying to thewwrnerdguy> interesting
[22:54:17] <MirahezeRelay>	 <raidarr> oh, had that reply still on
[22:54:29] <MirahezeRelay>	 <raidarr> half drafted, will be out in a short bit
[22:59:47] <MirahezeRelay>	 <raidarr> [1/5] wikitrivia's an interesting one and the one I'd most need to consult a peer with, I think I'd agree with  your conclusion there as the safest path. 2 indeed seems straightforward. 
[22:59:47] <MirahezeRelay>	 <raidarr> [2/5] miraewiki seems to be an adoption request in fact, and I'm a little reluctant on it because the requestor has a complicated centralauth history for one. A handful of local blocks, though also local proofs of stake, and no local contributions. Meanwhile the wiki itself has a very long history, a bureaucrat who while currently inactive was active in december and get this, has 15,437 ed
[22:59:48] <MirahezeRelay>	 <raidarr> [3/5] its. I would be uncomfortable with a standard adoption on this one even if it fit the outer bounds of a usual and valid local election, even if its not too lively right now. So outright I'm inclined towards reopening but unsure the ideal course on permissions granting. It is one of the rare circumstances I'd send a nudging email to the bureaucrat indicating there is someone intereste
[22:59:48] <MirahezeRelay>	 <raidarr> [4/5] d in advanced access there.
[22:59:48] <MirahezeRelay>	 <raidarr> [5/5] As for Bartomelow, well, one way to find out... if not, it is a thing I would bounce to the tech-stewards internal channel as a quick question