[17:56:29] [1/3] [17:56:29] [2/3] most suspicious wiki report of all time [17:56:29] [3/3] Saying that, they are completely correct, the bureaucrat never did anything on the wiki and the only page is the main page, which is definitely not covering the topic that the wiki was made for [18:08:56] Why so? [18:10:29] [1/2] > "politically insensitive content" [18:10:30] [2/2] (main page is about a Chinese event that I'll refer to as "Taylor Swift's 5th album") [18:11:31] there are ways to describe that but "politically insensitive" is not the sort of thing I'd expect anyone not working for a certain government to say [18:12:31] (I’m not enough of a Swiftie I have to check now :kek:) [18:14:44] Op yup [18:53:05] We've had a weird rash of abandoned-after-creation wikis that get turned into storefronts, but this is new