[16:48:27] it's uhhh [16:52:09]  @posix_memalign Who's going to be our M of the M? [16:52:28] make miraheze the mirahezean of the month [16:52:55] User:Miraheze??? Impersonation!! Banned immediately [16:54:06] I mean I wouldn't mind being mirahezean of the month with the recent GP acceptance but if you have someone else in mind like Elisapoly or...... [17:01:51] yes [17:02:05] @posix_memalign [17:03:15] i dont know anything about robots.txt [17:03:31] https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1225560610628964423/1530259144215494687/obraz.png?ex=6a64ec62&is=6a639ae2&hm=b2f5844fcb26a877a5044cca88730b5e0672cdbb8caf2de6f6be50fec3cc6b84& [17:04:36] It’s the folder about uhhh [17:04:39] Indexing [17:04:43] Something like that [17:04:46] ohhh [17:04:57] I think WWR tried to explain more but my brain melted [17:05:09] yeah my brain would melt too [17:05:42] anyways who will be the M of the M [17:05:47] i wonder that [17:05:49] lol [17:07:11] it's a file for robots to read that tells them how they should navigate the wiki [17:07:19] ohh [18:14:37] [1/4] I'll help the first 10 people interested on to  start earning $70k or more within a week, but you will reimburse me 10% of your profits when you receive it. Note: only interested people should send a friend request or send me a dm! ask me (HOW) via Telegram [18:14:37] [2/4] @SusanBeswick [18:14:38] [3/4] Or click The telegram link on my bio [18:14:38] [4/4] WhatsApp: +1 (727) 264-9665 [18:20:51] [1/2] There was a candidate who neither confirmed nor refused. I'll check again. [18:20:52] [2/2] The name is also mentioned in the MCR server btw, though it happened before your joined. [18:21:59] oo [18:23:25] :O [20:11:10] [1/2] I re-drafted https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/Requests_for_Comment/Future_of_Miraheze_Commons about four days ago based on an older draft that had been in circulation for months. People are engaging in the comments section, but I’m not expecting the substance of the proposal to change at this point. Think it’s ready to go live? For context this discussion first started (at least [20:11:10] [2/2] on-wiki) in February [20:45:33] I feel like tires have been adequately kicked as it's now been a few months. [20:45:47] With a quick read over, nothing glaring stands out to me. [21:06:24] I'd almost say to keep it from being overly black and white that there is a middle argument to be had for tighter regulation in specific [21:06:36] although the argument for that could vary by proposal [21:07:40] I think what I'd be tempted to add is a 2.1 for adjusting commons scope and better defining the uploader role [21:08:06] actually hm, doesn't really have a niche, built in well enough in 2 [21:13:24] In Proposals 2 and 3 it sets multi wiki use as the requirement, which I think has the effect of tightening the scope of Commons to “shared file host plumbing” as opposed to the more ambitious multimedia commons goal [21:16:08] yeah that works [21:16:29] I'm reasonably hopeful for prop 2 [22:42:10] [1/2] i literally dont know what these are lol [22:42:11] [2/2] https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1225560610628964423/1530344370388209754/obraz.png?ex=6a653bc2&is=6a63ea42&hm=b63c6d049a85e978779392db8448c5f81f4af0a5be1a471109e6dd393d378a9d& [22:42:48] yeah that's kinda the point of tech tip of the month [22:46:01] yeah ik [22:46:40] we will see what it'll be