[04:09:41] curious question [04:09:57] would the Apex unban RfC qualify for WP:SNOW [04:10:20] clearly there's consensus against unbanning, and it doesn't appear to be going anywhere [04:25:13] Agent: PII on SN, I've undone the revision as I believe that's correct procedure for protecting users' data [04:25:30] https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/Special:Diff/273180 [04:25:31] [url] Stewards' noticeboard: Difference between revisions - Miraheze Meta | meta.miraheze.org [04:25:32] oversight? [06:54:58] Last question [06:55:44] Please shut down reception wiki! [07:02:40] [discord] 6 months dude [07:02:44] [discord] stop spamming [07:03:02] [discord] they gonna be in 6 months dude (edited) [07:22:12] They already quit [07:31:40] [discord] can ya ban then if they'll start this again? [07:31:47] [discord] can ya ban them if they'll start this again? (edited) [13:38:58] Last question, then I promised never do again. [13:39:38] Shut down reception wikis [13:40:42] I can't hold it. [13:43:26] [discord] People have answered you on that MULTIPLE times already... [13:43:40] I know [13:44:18] Dont ban me [13:45:03] I promise [13:46:07] I can help you wait :) [13:47:26] [discord] Hm, how goes Miraheze? [17:26:03] BrandonWM : As far as I know there is nothing about "appeals" on the global bans policy anyway, only overturning the result [17:26:11] So it might be that the RFC is completely invalid to begin with [19:10:50] Naleksuh: https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/Global_bans#Appealing [19:10:50] [url] Global bans - Miraheze Meta | meta.miraheze.org [19:11:39] Yes, I noticed that had been added after my global ban had been filed [19:11:41] Read my newer comment [19:24:21] Naleksuh: I responded, but there was actually a proposal to apply the appeal restrictions retrospectively [19:25:48] All it does, is formalises the appeal process. An appeal was never strictly forbidden, it just now enforces a 3 month period inbetween appeals [20:37:47] [discord] why did the templatewiki get moved to dev [20:49:59] [discord] Merged as they shared a similar scope [20:58:19] They don't but people wanted to merge it anyway [20:58:28] Why not merge commons too? If template and dev share a scope, commons must too [21:02:19] [discord] Feel free to propose it [21:23:31] It was sarcasm [21:23:35] Obviously would be a bad idea