[00:31:06] I feel like I need an ELI5 on infobox templates šŸ˜­ [00:48:13] Have you checked out https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/Infoboxes yet? [00:50:16] [1/2] Also an earlier conversation that may be helpful if you're using portable info boxes: [00:50:17] [2/2] https://discord.com/channels/407504499280707585/407537962553966603/1214708113194885221 [01:15:46] [1/3] does anyone know how to move this image? (see picture) [01:15:47] [2/3] all the images i put are all in one column, but i want to make the images in two colums (no tables) [01:15:47] [3/3] https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/407537962553966603/1240835121297489970/Screen_Shot_2024-05-16_at_6.13.30_PM.png?ex=66480142&is=6646afc2&hm=a2f144c5d484f6f079d8688e75d38a26551138c95936df27da7c0e723be7cc45& [01:16:29] align: left maaaybe? [01:19:13] [1/2] I'd use `` tag [01:19:13] [2/2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Gallery_tag [01:25:23] Gallery tag's probably simplest, but multiple ways to solve [01:47:55] hey [01:48:00] is there a simple way to make a portal page [01:48:08] as just a user not a admin [02:03:11] [1/4] You mean like the portals on Wikipedia? [02:03:11] [2/4] They are basically just tables on a page. Granted, they've made it complex with templates and such, but in a nutshell. [02:03:11] [3/4] They've also put them in the Portal namespace, which you could create on your wiki if you wanted, but it's not necessary. [02:03:11] [4/4] https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Namespaces [02:34:39] yeah like wikipedia and alrighty ty [03:09:23] Iā€™m trying to be unblocked from ILW because Iā€™m really sorry for my actions on NQP [03:10:37] [1/2] The folks who can help you are listed here, they aren't on this discord to my knowledge: [03:10:37] [2/2] https://imaginationland.miraheze.org/wiki/Special:ListUsers/sysop [03:11:28] [1/2] Well @cyaniwynd is. [03:11:28] [2/2] Also, I canā€™t edit my talk page there [03:17:12] Also, apparently, the user im trying to contact wonā€™t even answer me, itā€™s the user who blocked me [03:22:27] After a quick review, given history on various qualitipedia-related projects (and inherent nature of the projects), unblock is extremely unlikely. As much as you would like an unblock, finding another outlet is likely a better use of time. Advice is in a personal capacity, not a functionary decree. [03:22:43] Then contact Wynd instead of posting here..? Just my personal advice of course [03:22:58] They aren't very active in this server afaik [03:23:21] I tried on meta, and they wonā€™t even respond [03:23:36] well maybe contact them on discord, not everyone checks meta [03:26:05] I wish I was never blocked there in the first place:Plush_J_Staring: [03:54:59] do note well that repeatedly bothering admins over an unblock request is and can be reported as a case of harassment [05:04:08] Oh I just realized who the person requesting unblock is [05:04:51] @hockeyboonchuy_17853 I'm an active reception wiki editor and former moderator of one and I highly doubt you will get unblocked considering your antics in Netpedia & etc [05:06:02] Going to put a quick nail in it here as there's a general pattern with regards to any kind of unblock discussions - any further can be had in #offtopic (provided it stays civil/respectful) or preferably, private DMs. Let's try and keep this channel for support :). [05:06:17] Alright understood [05:06:21] Many thanks to @koreirose and @m3w for assisting. [05:06:25] Np [05:42:42] Thanks, so I need to request for a config change instead. [05:43:39] My current wiki on Miraheze allows others to make edits but not saving them. And I did not publish licensing text online, so there isn't one. [05:43:54] But contents are open to be used and shared [06:05:41] seriously, just change it to private wiki and allow folks on invite basis [06:06:08] But how can I allow public visits if doing this [06:10:10] I've seen some wikis add certain pages to the read whitelist [06:10:19] creating a private/public hybrid [06:48:55] [1/2] Hi does somebody know the css class of the preview popups. I want to change the color to black. [06:48:55] [2/2] https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/407537962553966603/1240918958509654036/image.png?ex=66484f56&is=6646fdd6&hm=2e7ffb8018161155f7a29aa9fe2cc450bae5d0190459b91c4a3b9b98a82193bb& [06:54:22] oh, this one is hard [06:54:41] it was asked before but I don't remember if solution was foung [06:55:06] you can try to pinpoint class w/ debug pause in Firefox at least [07:01:28] .mwe-popups .mwe-popups-extract [07:05:12] K will try it [07:11:18] [1/2] It works halfly. The image background and the frame should be black as well [07:11:18] [2/2] https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/407537962553966603/1240924590650429470/image.png?ex=66485495&is=66470315&hm=c1008b02db84ef42d790e6a67079162490dc03293e344abc34b23a56f44c50a0& [07:11:43] is there an option for chrome? [07:12:54] .mwe-popups-container [07:16:26] sorry, I'm certified chrome hater [07:17:15] can kinda understand it. I use mainly waterfox [07:25:51] it either doesnt want to refresh or it doesnt work [07:32:36] need to do .mwe-popups .mwe-popups-container so that the specificity overrides the default [08:08:48] Is it normal that pages takes about 2 seconds to load, or is there something we can do to improve wiki performance? [08:15:26] In fact Miraheze initial page response is over 20x slower than our own hosted MediaWiki (Firefox inspector sees over 1000ms for https://wiki.themanaworld.org/wiki/Es:Generic_Items, whereas it is little over 30ms for https://oldwiki.themanaworld.org/index.php/Es:Generic_Items). [08:23:46] I hate Chrome it's disgusting and annoying but I love Chromium [08:24:43] Been a firefox user for at least 3 years [08:25:01] There is a way to do a "pause" in Chrome for these kinds of things, forgot how but there's a stack overflow post explaining it somewhere [08:26:43] I love Firefox for its functionality and design, but to equivalent implementations Chromium has more good algorithms [08:27:58] This is why I experience greater CPU consumption on Firefox [08:28:26] I have a chromium fork which probably doesn't receive updates anymore, just for CSS testing lol [08:28:32] Upon analysing the codes there are mathematical operations which seem to be repeative and unreasnable [08:29:22] Ohh nice since CSS is old school technology [08:30:05] I mean that some things show up differently between browser engines and it's frustrating lol [08:30:26] Like what? [08:30:29] why won't everyone use firefox lmao [08:30:45] From my experience Chromium and Firefox have equivalent features [08:31:11] I poke around wikis CSS a lot [08:31:19] So I love Firefox but for its mathematically operations, it harvests my CPU resources too much [08:31:34] I didn't noticed about any differences [08:31:48] On Firefox and Chromium, I mean [08:36:48] But for Safari, yes there are many differences on implementing different Web standards [09:02:31] [1/4] You are talking in unclear sentences from my perspective. [09:02:32] [2/4] As I said: You can not make up licenses based on subjective clauses. [09:02:32] [3/4] You need to find an existing license, that is closest to what you want. [09:02:32] [4/4] So please describe what the license would require. [09:02:58] [1/2] like this? [09:02:58] [2/2] https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/407537962553966603/1240952693187674142/image.png?ex=66486ec1&is=66471d41&hm=7a4eb62d5bcc56aa1e51756c44f61b3e8201752d99de8f9881b5c0ed7a13f08b& [09:03:32] reject firefox, embrace waterfox [09:03:47] try doing it in inspect element first to see if it works, but it should work [09:04:10] cant because once i remove my mouse it goes away [09:06:13] [1/2] idk if its the same on waterfox, but on firefox if u go to the debugger tab in inspect element it tells u what the keybind to pause js is, press it while hovered over the link [09:06:13] [2/2] https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/407537962553966603/1240953512309821530/image.png?ex=66486f85&is=66471e05&hm=dc3440946ee5d9cd5d38348a02af488c7fd9784ffaa5feb93e243441fc21bdd2& [09:06:53] I consulted with someone else before asking about a license which can fall into, he/she confirmed with me this would require a configuration change [09:06:58] This happened yesterday [09:07:37] *before, asking about [09:09:30] What configuration change should that be? [09:09:46] I remember he/she mentioned something like SR [09:11:57] [1/3] That is not a configuration. That is the [[Stewards Request]] pages [09:11:57] https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/Stewards_Request [09:11:57] [2/3] You need to make clear what you want. [09:11:58] [3/3] If it is to difficult in English, do it in Chinese and translate it to English [09:11:58] [09:12:32] Thanks for letting me know, and I have no difficulties in English. [09:12:45] I'll raise a request later then. [09:26:43] In theory, I suppose you could make [[mw:Manual:$wgRightsText]] "proprietary" and leave the licensing requirements to Project:Copyrights, but I'm not sure if this would be legal [09:26:43] https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:%24wgRightsText [09:26:44] [09:29:11] I think it's suitable for Phorge [09:30:14] I don't believe ManageWiki had a requirement for a license to operate under managewiki-restricted [09:47:54] [1/3] The problem from my point of view is that he wanted a license based on `"any people can freely use any contents for any proposes provided if such use is ethical and comes to the interest of the modern society"` [09:47:54] [2/3] The technical side of this is beyond me šŸ™‚ [09:47:55] [3/3] Only the requirements of the license he wants to create, which is impossible. There are no provisions in law that enforce "Ethics" or "Morality". So as I see it, it is unnecessary to create a custom task for something which has no base to build on. [09:54:31] [1/3] For example: Abortion. Is that Ethical or unethical? Depends from what point of view, and where that law is implemented. In Pakistan it's forbidden, in the Netherlands it's allowed. Our servers are in the US, but the writer could be in Russia. [09:54:32] [2/3] Most likely the US state where our servers are hosted would be leading from the Miraheze point of view, but LI AO would be in disagreement perhaps if he is against abortion. [09:54:32] [3/3] So it's a hornets nest to deal with. You can't enforce what is a personal opinion. [12:13:02] Yeah, that kind of vague license just doesn't work. Sure there are commercial and non-commercial licenses where potentially one could debate over whether something is commercial or not but ethics and "interests of society" is way too vague to the point where it's pretty much pointless to inclue as anyone can argue that it's ethical according to their own standards [14:26:54] Phorge is definitely the right place for requesting a custom license outside what is natively supported, but agreed that licenses are tricky to get right [16:14:46] [1/3] I'm sorry that I have many things to do, but I saw your messages above. Please allow me to explain. [16:14:46] [2/3] The reason for removing the CC BY-SA logo is because this may tell people that it should apply in terms of dictating the licensing model of wiki contents. The reason to add the above contexts is more like to make a declaration that contents are available to be used freely for ethical manners or such use comes to the interest of the modern society, instead I did not expilicitly forbid a [16:14:46] [3/3] ny uses through this declaration. [16:16:21] So the expected outcome is, I wanted to show up signals that good uses of contents are welcome, and I don't expilicitly forbid any uses which falls under clauses that are not indended to be. [16:18:52] [1/2] Because I did not formally make up any legal documents nor did I purpose another logo that actually tells that I use another legal form of licensing model for my wiki, information found in the licensing part from wiki settings is more like some sort of declarations. I can't dictate how others may use my contents for their own use, and I'm not intended to take controls over such activit [16:18:52] [2/2] ies. [16:34:37] šŸ¤ [16:36:38] Still not sure what waterfox does differently but if itā€™s cool May switch [16:40:59] Ok, itā€™s been around 5 days, I havenā€™t figured out how to see if my wiki has been accepted or not, would a nice engineer/admin of miraheze, or anyone really look under the wiki ā€œPixuniverseā€? If yuo have done it, itā€™s is very appreciated and thank yuo šŸ™‚ [16:41:26] Whatā€™s your wiki username [16:41:39] boredguy7773 [16:42:04] Please hold [16:43:05] Your request was closed as the wiki creator asked for additional details and never got a response [16:43:12] You are free to address the concerns and reopen [16:43:19] https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/Special:RequestWikiQueue/44229#mw-section-comments [16:43:39] Please check if you have an email attached to your account to be notified about new comments [16:44:15] Oh bro I didnā€™t know how to get to that page, man Iā€™m so dumb:xsob: [16:44:36] Itā€™s fine :) [16:44:58] You can go to https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/Special:RequestWikiQueue select all and your username [16:46:21] https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/407537962553966603/1241069309074210981/IMG_2113.png?ex=6648db5d&is=664789dd&hm=98922917e1b0a43335f159b23a5ae6ceb206c375a8a4fcbdac7f24a064ea0ace& [16:47:47] The database name is a bit weird [16:47:52] Itā€™s actually subdomainwiki [16:48:00] Oh [16:48:01] Ie my wiki is nyctocosm.Miraheze.org [16:48:06] Oh ok [16:48:06] Itā€™s db name is nyctocosmwiki [16:48:09] Lowercase [16:48:17] I thought it meant the site namešŸ¤¦šŸ¼ā€ā™‚ļø [16:48:22] Or just leave it blank for all requests from you [16:48:28] It is confusing tbh [16:49:06] https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/407537962553966603/1241070001771778179/IMG_2114.png?ex=6648dc02&is=66478a82&hm=b4c354985aa3cf16fb4fde09ba69e3e1fb70eaa08f2b1734ddf2d691bcbbeae6& [16:50:12] Oh [16:50:20] This will be more confusing than I thought it would be [16:51:05] I will stop trying, I have no idea what the heck Iā€™m supposed to answer [16:51:12] Itā€™s too confusing [16:51:14] Goodbye [16:52:04] And they're gone. [16:52:59] Huh [16:55:28] I'm curious, but has anyone here ever tried to advertise their wiki elsewhere? On Reddit, or anywhere else for that matter? While it seems like the best way to attract a wave of trolls and cause mass vandalism, I wonder if it isn't the fastest way to get publicity. [16:59:13] Oh plenty probably. Some are endorsed by a gameā€™s developers lord have socials on Twitter or Mastodon [16:59:20] Reddit probably depending on size [17:00:57] Ah yes, but for that to happen, the wiki must already be known, and not lost in the limbo of search engines. [17:01:00] is it possible to change the [17:01:02] url for my wiki [17:01:04] Yes [17:01:15] You need to make a [[phorge]] task [17:01:15] https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/phorge [17:01:16] [17:01:27] what about redirects [17:01:29] like two urls for the same wiki [17:01:35] We can set up a redirect I think [17:02:25] can you help me with that [17:02:33] i want to change the scope of my wiki to be more specific [17:03:12] If you want to change the scope you need approval on [[SR/M]] once your approve I can assist in making a task [17:03:12] https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/SR/M [17:03:13] [17:03:26] its not much of a scope change [17:03:29] its like [17:03:51] [1/2] here's an example: [17:03:51] [2/2] if original wiki was about history, then the scope change would be u.s. history [17:03:58] thats not my wiki, but an example [17:04:46] I think it's generally the opposite [17:05:00] But I'm probably talking nonsense [17:05:13] I mean youā€™re right [17:05:18] I had worst experience at trying to advertise wikis on reddit tbh [17:05:36] Oh yeah, how's that? [17:05:44] nobody cares [17:05:55] I care [17:06:11] I meant people on reddit don't care lmao [17:06:27] Itā€™s fucking Reddit [17:06:37] It wasn't a bad experience then, was it? [17:06:39] twitter when it was ok and public helped to boost my first wiki in google [17:07:33] Then I was talking about Reddit as an example [17:07:51] For me it was a massive success [17:08:14] idk man it always feels like a joke to me [17:08:21] in 2017, in 2023 [17:08:29] nothing worked lol [17:08:35] whatever [17:08:58] Sorry to hear that [17:09:08] going round discord servers seems to be more sensible [17:09:43] Wikipedia is very biased [17:09:45] facebook too, maybe [17:09:55] The thing is, other than Reddit, I have no idea where advertising is possible. [17:10:20] but facebook is like ... strange on target audience [17:10:21] eh, twitter is too much to hanf;e [17:10:33] right now yeah [17:10:55] Depends on the wiki topic [17:11:04] actually tumblr might be good too [17:11:53] Well, that's for sure, but what if it's on a very well-known, world-popular subject? [17:11:53] isnt that sit like [17:12:00] nonexistent? [17:12:13] lmao [17:12:19] I hang there since 2011 [17:12:41] for me reddit worked https://www.reddit.com/r/TNOmod/comments/190yp4m/tnopedia_a_new_wiki_website_for_tno_and_its/ [17:13:07] Haven't you had waves of vandalism? [17:13:15] im pretty sure that yahoo bought it and outlawed nsfw content [17:13:15] tumblr is doing a liiiiitle bit better than during infamous nsfw ban of early 2019 [17:13:33] yahoo sold it to another company later [17:13:44] at hilariously low price [17:13:46] only once when somebody vandalized my user page and then some random counry page [17:13:50] no other vandalism [17:14:09] but to me a biggrr poblem was inexperienced editors rather than vandals [17:14:12] In any case @tunityguy, congratulations to you. [17:14:29] thanks, but keep an eye out on people who dont know how to edit [17:14:32] I'll advertise when my wiki is more developed. [17:14:37] thats why I suggest writing guidelines [17:14:40] Know that [17:14:45] that act as rules and a manua; [17:14:49] I already do [17:14:55] I will say this, it takes a considerable amount of effort to obtain formal endorsement from the creators. it does start with respect, being factual in coverage, being able to communicate complaints properly [17:15:02] good, [17:15:25] it takes a lot of dedication to gain the level of respect from creator to gain their trust, then must maintain that level of trust [17:15:41] for me what happened was that 2 days after I created the wiki one of the developers sent me a message that they were already seting up a wiki on wiki.gg [17:15:46] which was a slap in the face [17:16:20] oh, feel ya on this lol [17:16:31] The design of your wiki is really nice @tunityguy . No wonder it's been so popular. [17:16:37] except devs in my case don't give a slightest fuck [17:16:42] Oh, thanks [17:17:02] [1/2] well here is something to consider, wiki.gg works directly with game developers to craft them a formal wiki with their explicit endorsement. Its always _their_ choice who they work with or endorse [17:17:02] [2/2] in this case, if their wish is to work with wiki.gg then you need to respect it and stop competing with them [17:17:29] i'm sorry this is the outcome [17:17:33] For me they forced us to cut ties with some other projects and then proceeded to frame us for extremism [17:17:58] I know, but I don't care since their wiki is barely viewed and edited by 2 people (the only ones that have perms) [17:17:58] that is their legal right especially if you were affiliates [17:18:37] Well I wouldn't say "legal" since it's not a real game but I genuinely don't care as much as I did for the hostility towards us [17:18:42] you understand that taking a stance of "don't care" can lead to legal action taken against legal action [17:19:00] After all our wikis kind of have different purposes anyways [17:19:03] What? [17:19:15] see edit [17:19:32] Oh, well it's not a real game [17:19:39] I'm pretty sure a mod can't sue miraheze [17:19:50] A steam workshop mod [17:19:52] wiki.gg took on a mod? [17:19:59] Yes [17:20:01] that's rather surprising [17:20:22] Idk, I just found miraheze as a better choice because of costumisability [17:20:58] seeing as you have chosen to disregard their request, the hostility is not surprising. its their "product" that they want to control the marketing and you have taken that from them [17:21:46] Yeah but at the same time its just a mod for a shitty swedish map game [17:21:50] They took the Aether Mod as well I think a while ago [17:22:12] I tought they miraheze would strict on allowing wikis than wiki.gg [17:22:27] Since wiki.gg gets ad revenues anyeay [17:22:58] hmm though pcj did say was thinking to expand allowed topics, I imagine taking in mod wikis would have additional conditions imposed such that if any legal action was threatened then the wiki would be closed [17:23:06] We have gotten more strict with the content policy [17:23:08] Also is that the shit where you place water on glowstone? [17:23:40] well they have paid employees, have to pay them somehow and most editors are not going to pay for their advanced subscription service [17:23:50] also the hosting costs [17:24:04] Yeah, one of the oldest and most famous mods for minecraft tmk [17:24:12] Do does miraheze [17:24:26] yes and usually donations are not viewed as reliable [17:24:27] I tought it was just a hoax [17:25:00] I can see [17:25:11] if you look around, almost every single wiki host provider relies on ad revenue to operate with the exception of paid services that cover the costs [17:25:26] bruh [17:26:00] I had to make a whole debunking controversies on my user page [17:26:22] I mean, fandom wikis still float on similar rationale, community is free to use whatever they want [17:26:31] this situation makes me wonder why miraheze is allowing said wiki to continue to exist despite a formal request [17:26:41] official stuff doesn't always mean best from my experience [17:26:55] whether its a mod or not, that is still considered intellectual property you have no actual permission outside fair dealing/use [17:26:57] Which wiki [17:27:25] Yours, I think. [17:27:31] the one you were talking about from the start [17:27:38] Oh, right [17:27:52] normally that is grounds for full removal [17:27:58] Technically we do have permission, when I was setting it up I asked them [17:28:16] well things change [17:28:48] obviously, they wanted you to close up shop so they could promote theirs the way that they intended but were met by competition [17:29:02] hence the hostility [17:31:36] Rain World publisher DMCAd Fandom to shut down a wiki and some time later someone else started new fandom wiki, although it has no chance to compete w/ Miraheze on at this point [17:32:30] in the case of fandom, they do not actually care. their screening process is automatic and probably failed to include dmca closures into filters to deny [17:32:56] that also means Rain world can dmca miraheze [17:33:32] Rain World Wiki on Mira is official, that's why they DMCAd Fandom in the first place [17:33:36] very rare case [17:33:43] but again [17:34:16] prohibiting creating alt wikis is like prohibiting alt fan groups [17:34:19] server [17:34:20] etc [17:34:26] community lives on its own [17:34:54] NIWA is explicitly independent from Nintendo [17:38:59] for someone it would be nice to be an officially recognized wiki but I can't see a lot of pros in that, rather stay independent [17:40:17] the undeniable problem w/ Fandom alts is ofc SEO [17:55:16] regardless of how you feel about prohibiting alt wikis, the intellectual property owners have the right to shut any such alt wikis down. the same goes for any community groups, they are simply _allowed_ to operate and can be shutdown at any time. [17:56:07] [1/4] the impact of SEO when on a wikifarm relies on 2 parts: [17:56:07] [2/4] - reputation of the wikifarm's domain as a whole [17:56:08] [3/4] - reputation of the individual wiki [17:56:08] [4/4] with how google is cracking down on duplicate content, that's a bigger hurdle [17:58:39] No they aren't [17:58:54] Fanworks are legal [18:01:25] You don't have to create duplicate content to cover the same content as a Fandom wiki [18:01:55] The Miraheze domain actually has pretty strong domain authority and a lot of backlinks [18:08:35] [1/3] Could this RfC be closed? [18:08:36] [2/3] https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/Requests_for_Comment/Meta_extended_confirmed_users [18:08:36] [3/3] It's been a draft for a month and the creator abandoned it after being told it's useless [18:10:02] Also even if fanworks weren't fair use, "the intellectual property owners" would he the only ones who can, not random people, and the DMCA would make Miraheze not have legal liability for copyright infringement if takedown requests are handled properly [18:10:52] If I uploaded a pirated movie or something onto a Miraheze wiki, Miraheze isn't liable for that unless they receive and ignore a DMCA takedown request [18:11:06] Apps like Kik have ignored much worse [18:14:01] Fan works operate under fair use at the discretion of the actual material owner [18:15:31] If the owner says no alt wikis other than the wiki we endorse, that settles it. No ifs or buts. [18:16:27] Fandom got into big fight with gamepedia over endorsed wikis by issuing global bans when requested to remove their badge [18:16:38] https://www.transformativeworks.org/fanworks-fair-use-and-fair-dealing/ [18:16:45] No? [18:17:01] Fair use isn't determined by whether the copyright owner requests it [18:17:18] Having a license to use a work is a different defense [18:17:27] Fair use or dealing is a legal doctrine allowing for use [18:17:36] Isn't actual permission [18:17:37] Yeah well that's normal Fandom behavior [18:17:40] We generally donā€™t accept fan wikis based off existing IP, from a Miraheze perspective [18:17:46] I am aware [18:17:51] Or thatā€™s how I recall [18:18:01] The proposal to forbid them was rejected in an RfC [18:18:14] Miraheze should not override community consensus [18:18:16] We donā€™t forbid them but set strict restrictions because of copyright issues [18:18:32] Those restrictions are not anywhere in policy [18:18:37] Theyā€™re still approved but less so iirc [18:18:53] Itā€™s laid out in the Terms of Use I believe, we canā€™t host illegal content [18:19:12] As long as itā€™s not illegal thereā€™s not an issue [18:19:21] But I donā€™t fully remember and my brain is foggy on that one [18:19:25] [1/2] If it wasn't approved and is enforced... [18:19:25] [2/2] Brandon reminder to double check before speaking [18:19:39] :p [18:19:45] we donā€™t host illegal content [18:19:56] Obviously [18:20:04] There's also the "No creating problems for other wikis or for Miraheze." which could apply so if it's something that draws negative attention that would count [18:20:40] Like I said earlier, fanfiction and the like aren't necessarily illegal, and Miraheze doesn't have legal liability for copyright infringement by its users if DMCA takedowns are processed properly [18:20:48] I don't think it would make sense to have a Content Policy that attempts to spell every single thing out in precise terms. Stewards are elected to use their discretion where necessary [18:21:01] On that note, that should have been applied to request from actual minecraft wiki community to close out months ago a dead fork [18:21:39] (personal opinion, doesn't represent the Board) at the same time I don't feel like Miraheze wants to risk being sued so sometimes a more cautious approach is needed [18:21:53] An RfC was opened regarding this topic. A proposal was made to forbid fanficfion wikis. The proposal failed. Stewards, by policy, do not have authority to override community decisions [18:21:56] so we're not in a position to pick fights against big copyright holders either [18:21:58] caution is the name of the game, Iā€™d say [18:22:13] We do not forbid fan fiction wikis. [18:22:14] Yes, that's why they're not "forbidden" [18:22:16] The case could be dismissed very early on if its meritless regardless of how big the plantiff is [18:22:44] you shouldn't underestimate so called SLAPPs, they are effective sometimes [18:23:02] Then what even is the discussion? The discussion was whether fan wikis are forbidden or illegal iirc [18:23:05] Use of copyright or trademark if it in any way damages or harms reputation or sales won't be easily dismissed [18:23:07] Regardless, illegal content/potential for illegality = not hosted [18:23:34] Fan fiction wikis are not banned, fan fiction wikis based on existing IP are highly scrutinized, but also not banned [18:23:59] Yes I don't think it's a black/white all fanfic wikis are illegal or legal [18:24:10] it depends on the specific set up and content of the wiki [18:24:51] Some wiki hosts spell out exactly their fair use allowance covers. Usually it's a strict compliance where such material is used to a minimum. [18:25:06] Most jurisdictions have laws that allow dismissal of SLAPP suits, regardless a case could be dismissed under Rule 12(6)(b) (see Twombly and Iqbal) if the complaint alleges that individual Miraheze users infringed copyright if there's no allegation that Miraheze isn't complying with DMCA takedowns [18:25:48] When a case is filed in the US the complaint has to allege something probable not something that is very unlikely or vagud [18:25:58] Weā€™re not inclined to host copyright violations either way [18:26:11] Iā€™d prefer we never get to the point where a DMCA takedown request is needed. [18:26:15] Nintendo is known to file regardless if winnable [18:27:45] When MH hosts user generated content a DMCA takedown will be received eventually, all MH has to do is delete the violating content and warn whoever posted it, unless MH themselves is infringing copyright it's not possible for MH as an organization to be held liable of the DMCA is being complied with [18:27:49] Either way I feel like we don't want to get to any sort of lawsuit if possible. Either way we're not there yet so there's no need to get into hypothetical at this stage [18:29:18] [1/2] Well OK I'll drop the subject but I do feel it's worth mentioning that any sufficiently popular organization has a large chance of being sued eventually, regardless of whether the case is frivolous. So as MH grows some day someone will want to sue MH because a wiki hosted something that offends them or whatever. The WMF has been sues for things like that m [18:29:19] [2/2] any times [18:29:59] Most US court cases are nonsense because well it's the US [18:30:19] Usually if content is covered factually and respectful of owner, there's less danger [18:30:55] Do it well and can gain endorsement which grants permission to use assets [18:36:57] The target and popularity of the piece can also be a factor, even if its factual, but now we're slowly getting into made up scenarios [18:37:04] :ellenLUL: courtroom fanfiction if you will [18:37:54] lmao [18:45:15] yes but the key point is being respectful to the actual owner and typically the owner allows the activity because it is considered an asset to them aka free promotions/advertisement for new customers [21:00:56] how to stop non-admins from moving pages [21:01:16] Remove the move right from users [21:01:38] thx [21:02:28] how? [21:02:50] [[Special:ManageWiki/permissions]] [21:02:50] https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/Special:ManageWiki/permissions [21:02:51] [21:04:22] [1/2] its already blank (i know the css sucks) [21:04:22] [2/2] https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/407537962553966603/1241134237462040596/image.png?ex=664917d5&is=6647c655&hm=e047107afee6e5cb1c55d0347f7f6ace614fba4fb0900b3cfbc6c703074b8465& [21:05:42] Try under */(everyone) [21:09:50] [1/2] still the same thing [21:09:50] [2/2] https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/407537962553966603/1241135613277634631/image.png?ex=6649191d&is=6647c79d&hm=2dd0c206b0f0c148326e6456c27ba1dae1f5a88204c4c474bcdd506a10d9c8e7& [21:12:25] [1/2] can i do here [21:12:25] [2/2] https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/407537962553966603/1241136265202503701/image.png?ex=664919b8&is=6647c838&hm=7baa026db60b1ce4d840af01cd6750acfdcc18147ab14e01892f78275dc0b1a8& [21:13:54] no [21:15:03] but its blank here [21:15:04] https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/407537962553966603/1241136934273679431/image.png?ex=66491a58&is=6647c8d8&hm=38b2fa2bb8ca9cd0171d1d7a87dabc618407ef5c7e33cea9d219a2d7b2248339& [21:15:08] so idk what to do [21:15:23] Check a different groups then [21:16:06] users? [21:16:13] and auto confirmed users [21:39:39] What are your permissions like for "(everyone)" [21:39:55] As it should be a default user permission [22:43:22] [1/3] does anyone know how to move this image? (see picture) [22:43:22] [2/3] all the images i put are all in one column, but i want to make the images in two colums (no tables) [22:43:22] [3/3] https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/407537962553966603/1240835121297489970/Screen_Shot_2024-05-16_at_6.13.30_PM.png?ex=6648aa02&is=66475882&hm=cdc0679f6ce39755d909debd9443d1506d8389ced55cb3c68647029475277823& [22:43:39] the gallery tag didn't really work [23:33:17] Why are images shoeing when searching/previewing pages sometimes and sometimes not? [23:33:26] Here is an example: the preview nor search bar will not show an image for a page [23:33:56] [1/2] https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/407537962553966603/1241171881349087232/Snimka_zaslona_2024-05-17_145251.png?ex=66493ae4&is=6647e964&hm=dc54a72301a0f04c85ca25ccb4254a5a0418df71c5d363a98b428da162fee112& [23:33:57] [2/2] https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/407537962553966603/1241171881675980871/Snimka_zaslona_2024-05-17_145302.png?ex=66493ae4&is=6647e964&hm=b98d0e6ec26bc392dde6ceaaffc6a67381caef2eaebdae5fd9eb089c80c46e00& [23:34:04] On other pages it's shown on both though [23:34:10] [1/2] https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/407537962553966603/1241171937582121030/Snimka_zaslona_2024-05-17_145351.png?ex=66493af1&is=6647e971&hm=cd92c9d568e60b5d0e300f17ae2c9b772468d71e2ade5d4df3986d6a0bab8251& [23:34:10] [2/2] https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/407537962553966603/1241171937942704261/image-18.png?ex=66493af1&is=6647e971&hm=d50064c517bfa1bf58caa25896ec5fd646c947c1eb4d0452ebac718d111a7848&