[11:52:51] <braxas>	 hi, is there some way to find or indicate notable subclasses or instances of something? Like I would like to easily find alphabet (https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q9779) from writing system (https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q8192)
[12:00:16] <phschafft>	 notable by which definition?
[12:11:41] <braxas>	 phschafft: exactly
[12:12:23] <braxas>	 I mean my question stands, I would get it if there is no way, it's not easy to be objective about it, but alphabet is a notable subclass of writing systems
[12:21:01] <phschafft>	 I always thought the policy is to only include stuff that is 'notable' to begin with ;)
[12:21:40] <phschafft>	 braxas: my point is: if you can *define* what you want to search for you might be able to write a query for it.
[20:25:38] <jka^>	 braxas: that sounds like a request to add a property to the relation (subclass being the relation in this case -- but could equally be for various other relations, or perhaps even applicable to the properties of items).  I don't know of any feature for that, but I don't have a lot of experience with wikidata
[20:27:59] <jka^>	 the amount of review effort to maintain notability status seems like it could be a scaling concern, also (so it might need, at least initially, to be constrained to a small number of elements, until proven both feasible editorially and also in terms of value produced)
[20:30:26] <phschafft>	 I mean you can add something to the statements.
[20:31:52] <phschafft>	 but I think the main problem is actually defining 'notable'. and explaining why it is different from then general 'notablity' that is required for items to have to begin with.
[20:33:57] <jka^>	 as wikipedia decides whether an article is worthy of inclusion based on ... , wikidata decides whether a statement or property is worthy of ... based on ...
[20:34:53] <jka^>	 answers on a Q192425
[20:39:08] <phschafft>	 so if at all another notibility would be required then it should maybe just a property that holds the value for that additional definition.
[20:39:50] <phschafft>	 (such a definition might be boolean or define different levels after all.) that would also allow for stuff like reference to be placed in the relevant statement.