[08:38:50] \o/ we got the toolforge repos in the codesearch app [08:39:04] (both tools and admins) [08:39:29] https://codesearch.wmcloud.org/wmcs/?action=repos [08:42:47] dcaro: nice! having tofu stuff indexes is going to be really useful [08:42:48] https://codesearch.wmcloud.org/search/?q=cloud-flat&files=&excludeFiles=&repos= [08:42:55] indexed* [08:44:48] definitely, searching ips/networks/sec gorups/etc. becomes easier :) [09:49:03] I saw these two tickets flying [09:49:04] T376019 [09:49:15] T376018 [09:50:24] XioNoX: we got actual 80% port utilization alerts now in alertmanager, with `team: wmcs`, not paging the SRE team, so that's cool! [09:50:56] yeah got the netops email too! [09:51:00] all good [10:01:16] T376019 (test) [10:01:25] interesting, that ticket crashes stashbot xd [10:02:20] * dcaro lunch [10:27:30] https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T375454 feels like utter nonsense [10:27:49] arturo: ^ [10:28:24] RhinosF1: I definitely had the same chatGPT feeling :-( [10:31:55] arturo: it's ChatGPT for sure and not of any benefit cause it's got nothing to do with Miraheze [10:32:34] They said they don't know what the benefit is [10:32:53] RhinosF1: ok, thanks for your input. It is really valuable. I think I will reject the request, unless anybody opposes [10:33:36] +1 to rejecting it [10:33:59] done [10:48:58] can I get a +1 for T375977? [10:48:59] T375977: Temporary (1-2 weeks) quota increase for disaster recovery exercise - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T375977 [10:50:34] dhinus: +1'd [10:50:39] thanks [11:43:25] arturo: thanks for working on the tofu refactor, I left a couple comments. maybe it's worth discussing in a google meet? I can join the collab meeting but I need some food first :) [11:44:16] sure [12:48:08] arturo: are you around? [12:48:24] yes, but I'm about to go lunch [12:48:34] ok let's talk later then [13:28:28] any objections to me approving this toolforge membership? https://toolsadmin.wikimedia.org/tools/membership/status/1792 [13:29:02] bd808 asked a question last week, the answer sounds more or less reasonable to me [13:36:19] I'm a bit suspicious that the research will end up actually implementing anything usable, like the benefits mentioned, though I'm leaning more to accepting it. If they "abuse" the infra for research purposes we can handle it as we would handle any miner, but open research is always a better outcome than bitcoins in the worst case imo [13:37:00] ideally universities should pitch in resources to do that kind of research, maybe request for the research results to be open at least? [14:07:08] dhinus: I'm available now [14:07:30] ok! let me create a meeting [14:07:47] or we can just use the checkin one [14:08:18] ok, lets join the chekin one [16:53:51] * dcaro off, cya tomorrow