[00:38:07] <bd808>	 @reputation22: I'm not quite sure if this is what you are looking for, but https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Commit-message-validator has a GitLab CI/CD template that can be used to validate commit messages in a merge request. It does not currently have an option to enforce that all commit messages contain a "Bug: Tnnnnnnn" component however.
[03:41:38] <wm-bb>	 <reputation22> yeah sure.. we won't need a enforcer per say..but yes this works
[03:41:38] <wm-bb>	 <reputation22> also will it sync with phab? like in gerrit i remember when we raise a patch we used to have a tag added to the ticket (patch-for-review) (re @wmtelegram_bot: <bd808> @reputation22: I'm not quite sure if this is what you are looking for, but https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Commit-message...)
[04:09:09] <wm-bb>	 <bd808> Yes, there is a bot that will comment on the task and show that there is a related merge request. I don’t remember if it also adds the patch-for-review tag or not. https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T364575 is one task showing the integration.
[10:33:17] <wm-bb>	 <reputation22> sure i'll look into this
[10:33:17] <wm-bb>	 <reputation22> thanks (re @bd808: Yes, there is a bot that will comment on the task and show that there is a related merge request. I don’t remember if it also ad...)
[14:39:34] <wm-bb>	 <Ay.sew> በFacebook እና በMessenger ላይ ክትትልን ለማዋቀር ይጋብዙ፦ https://familycenter.facebook.com/invite/t/WAQMo0sJVAIyWu42TSz1kLTVJlRR4/
[17:22:40] <wm-bb>	 <bozzy> To organize tasks for a wmhack satellite event 2025, is it appropriate to create a milestone under wmhack 2025? or "our own" tag?
[17:28:28] <wm-bb>	 <malyacko> I guess you could if it's green with a calendar icon and doesn't move all watchers? :P shrug
[17:31:04] <wm-bb>	 <bozzy> OK. I don't propose "sub-project" since it moves members there (and I know everybody loves Palermo but..) lol
[17:33:20] <wm-bb>	 <bozzy> Is it a bit long something like "Wikimedia-Hackaton-2025-Satellite-Event-Palermo"? lol
[21:01:37] <bd808>	 @bozzy: Give it an alt tag of #palermo :)
[21:12:19] <wm-bb>	 <bozzy> thanks bd808
[21:13:47] <wm-bb>	 <bozzy> whops, edit conflict
[21:13:55] <bd808>	 no worries :)
[21:14:34] <wm-bb>	 <bozzy> another feature request for Phorge... yuppie
[21:15:12] <bd808>	 yeah, I'm pretty sure we whined upstream about edit conflicts a decade ago
[21:16:00] <wm-bb>	 <bozzy> You're right. Found legacy https://secure.phabricator.com/T4768
[21:57:08] <wm-bb>	 <bozzy> I mean T78236 in our land