[01:19:16] 10GitLab (Infrastructure), 10Release-Engineering-Team (Radar), 10User-brennen: Ocassionally pushing to GitLab takes very long - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T332967 (10Legoktm) Pulling 2 commits in `repos/mwbot-rs/toolforge` took 3+ minutes today: `lines=10 time GIT_TRACE=1 git pull 18:14:24.266517 git... [02:45:02] Project beta-code-update-eqiad build #454819: 04FAILURE in 2 min 1 sec: https://integration.wikimedia.org/ci/job/beta-code-update-eqiad/454819/ [02:53:01] Project beta-code-update-eqiad build #454820: 04STILL FAILING in 0.58 sec: https://integration.wikimedia.org/ci/job/beta-code-update-eqiad/454820/ [03:03:01] Project beta-code-update-eqiad build #454821: 04STILL FAILING in 0.57 sec: https://integration.wikimedia.org/ci/job/beta-code-update-eqiad/454821/ [03:13:01] Project beta-code-update-eqiad build #454822: 04STILL FAILING in 0.55 sec: https://integration.wikimedia.org/ci/job/beta-code-update-eqiad/454822/ [03:23:01] Project beta-code-update-eqiad build #454823: 04STILL FAILING in 0.56 sec: https://integration.wikimedia.org/ci/job/beta-code-update-eqiad/454823/ [03:33:01] Project beta-code-update-eqiad build #454824: 04STILL FAILING in 0.55 sec: https://integration.wikimedia.org/ci/job/beta-code-update-eqiad/454824/ [03:43:01] Project beta-code-update-eqiad build #454825: 04STILL FAILING in 0.62 sec: https://integration.wikimedia.org/ci/job/beta-code-update-eqiad/454825/ [03:53:01] Project beta-code-update-eqiad build #454826: 04STILL FAILING in 0.55 sec: https://integration.wikimedia.org/ci/job/beta-code-update-eqiad/454826/ [04:03:01] Project beta-code-update-eqiad build #454827: 04STILL FAILING in 0.63 sec: https://integration.wikimedia.org/ci/job/beta-code-update-eqiad/454827/ [04:13:01] Project beta-code-update-eqiad build #454828: 04STILL FAILING in 0.59 sec: https://integration.wikimedia.org/ci/job/beta-code-update-eqiad/454828/ [04:23:01] Project beta-code-update-eqiad build #454829: 04STILL FAILING in 0.56 sec: https://integration.wikimedia.org/ci/job/beta-code-update-eqiad/454829/ [04:33:01] Project beta-code-update-eqiad build #454830: 04STILL FAILING in 0.54 sec: https://integration.wikimedia.org/ci/job/beta-code-update-eqiad/454830/ [04:43:01] Project beta-code-update-eqiad build #454831: 04STILL FAILING in 0.57 sec: https://integration.wikimedia.org/ci/job/beta-code-update-eqiad/454831/ [04:53:01] Project beta-code-update-eqiad build #454832: 04STILL FAILING in 0.55 sec: https://integration.wikimedia.org/ci/job/beta-code-update-eqiad/454832/ [05:03:01] Project beta-code-update-eqiad build #454833: 04STILL FAILING in 0.55 sec: https://integration.wikimedia.org/ci/job/beta-code-update-eqiad/454833/ [05:13:01] Project beta-code-update-eqiad build #454834: 04STILL FAILING in 0.57 sec: https://integration.wikimedia.org/ci/job/beta-code-update-eqiad/454834/ [05:23:01] Project beta-code-update-eqiad build #454835: 04STILL FAILING in 0.58 sec: https://integration.wikimedia.org/ci/job/beta-code-update-eqiad/454835/ [05:33:01] Project beta-code-update-eqiad build #454836: 04STILL FAILING in 0.65 sec: https://integration.wikimedia.org/ci/job/beta-code-update-eqiad/454836/ [05:43:01] Project beta-code-update-eqiad build #454837: 04STILL FAILING in 0.58 sec: https://integration.wikimedia.org/ci/job/beta-code-update-eqiad/454837/ [05:53:01] Project beta-code-update-eqiad build #454838: 04STILL FAILING in 0.58 sec: https://integration.wikimedia.org/ci/job/beta-code-update-eqiad/454838/ [06:03:01] Project beta-code-update-eqiad build #454839: 04STILL FAILING in 0.6 sec: https://integration.wikimedia.org/ci/job/beta-code-update-eqiad/454839/ [06:13:01] Project beta-code-update-eqiad build #454840: 04STILL FAILING in 0.61 sec: https://integration.wikimedia.org/ci/job/beta-code-update-eqiad/454840/ [06:23:01] Project beta-code-update-eqiad build #454841: 04STILL FAILING in 0.55 sec: https://integration.wikimedia.org/ci/job/beta-code-update-eqiad/454841/ [06:33:01] Project beta-code-update-eqiad build #454842: 04STILL FAILING in 0.56 sec: https://integration.wikimedia.org/ci/job/beta-code-update-eqiad/454842/ [06:43:01] Project beta-code-update-eqiad build #454843: 04STILL FAILING in 0.58 sec: https://integration.wikimedia.org/ci/job/beta-code-update-eqiad/454843/ [06:53:01] Project beta-code-update-eqiad build #454844: 04STILL FAILING in 0.54 sec: https://integration.wikimedia.org/ci/job/beta-code-update-eqiad/454844/ [07:03:01] Project beta-code-update-eqiad build #454845: 04STILL FAILING in 0.66 sec: https://integration.wikimedia.org/ci/job/beta-code-update-eqiad/454845/ [07:13:01] Project beta-code-update-eqiad build #454846: 04STILL FAILING in 0.56 sec: https://integration.wikimedia.org/ci/job/beta-code-update-eqiad/454846/ [07:23:01] Project beta-code-update-eqiad build #454847: 04STILL FAILING in 0.57 sec: https://integration.wikimedia.org/ci/job/beta-code-update-eqiad/454847/ [07:33:01] Project beta-code-update-eqiad build #454848: 04STILL FAILING in 0.59 sec: https://integration.wikimedia.org/ci/job/beta-code-update-eqiad/454848/ [07:43:01] Project beta-code-update-eqiad build #454849: 04STILL FAILING in 0.61 sec: https://integration.wikimedia.org/ci/job/beta-code-update-eqiad/454849/ [07:51:53] (03PS1) 10Robert Vogel: Review access change [extensions/HeaderFooter] (refs/meta/config) - 10https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/942728 [07:52:03] (03CR) 10Robert Vogel: [V: 03+2 C: 03+2] Review access change [extensions/HeaderFooter] (refs/meta/config) - 10https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/942728 (owner: 10Robert Vogel) [07:53:01] Project beta-code-update-eqiad build #454850: 04STILL FAILING in 0.57 sec: https://integration.wikimedia.org/ci/job/beta-code-update-eqiad/454850/ [08:03:01] Project beta-code-update-eqiad build #454851: 04STILL FAILING in 0.57 sec: https://integration.wikimedia.org/ci/job/beta-code-update-eqiad/454851/ [08:13:01] Project beta-code-update-eqiad build #454852: 04STILL FAILING in 0.58 sec: https://integration.wikimedia.org/ci/job/beta-code-update-eqiad/454852/ [08:23:01] Project beta-code-update-eqiad build #454853: 04STILL FAILING in 0.56 sec: https://integration.wikimedia.org/ci/job/beta-code-update-eqiad/454853/ [08:23:58] !log temporarily disabled failing beta-code-update-eqiad job [08:23:59] Logged the message at https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Release_Engineering/SAL [09:13:56] 10GitLab (Auth & Access), 10Release-Engineering-Team (Radar), 10CAS-SSO, 10Infrastructure-Foundations, and 4 others: migrate gitlab away from the CAS protocol - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T320390 (10Jelto) OIDC is enabled instance-wide now. >>! In T320390#9052117, @dancy wrote: > In https://gitlab... [09:15:11] _joe_, claime: morning ๐Ÿ‘‹ [09:15:21] I'm looking into a problem with the Jenkins beta jobs, `/srv` partition on the Jenkins beta node is out of space [09:15:27] <_joe_> uh hello [09:15:28] yello [09:15:28] I've seen that in `/srv/deployment-charts`, `.git` is taking up 14G [09:15:34] oof [09:15:36] <_joe_> wat [09:15:39] last locally checked out commit there goes back to May so I'm guessing we are not using those charts in beta atm? [09:15:51] tried running `git gc` but it cannot reach some commits and fails, fetching changes has the same problem [09:16:00] I was thinking of deleting the dir altogether, unless you think it's actually being used [09:16:04] <_joe_> jnuche: I don't understand [09:16:23] <_joe_> it's 38 M on my computer and I do have 100s of dead branches I'm sure [09:16:30] <_joe_> but yes that makes sense [09:16:44] <_joe_> so, if it is, a puppet run should bring it back [09:16:49] jnuche@deployment-deploy03:/srv/deployment-charts$ du -sh .git [09:16:49] 14G .git [09:16:59] <_joe_> jnuche: I am not saying you're wrong [09:17:03] <_joe_> I'm saying I'm surprised [09:17:19] I know, just wanted to show what I was seeing :) [09:17:27] <_joe_> for comparison [09:17:29] <_joe_> deploy1002:/srv/deployment-charts $ du -sh .git [09:17:31] <_joe_> 22M .git [09:17:34] I agree with _joe_, just remove it, if it's needed puppet will put it back [09:17:47] 10GitLab (Auth & Access), 10Release-Engineering-Team (Radar), 10CAS-SSO, 10Infrastructure-Foundations, and 4 others: migrate gitlab away from the CAS protocol - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T320390 (10CodeReviewBot) jelto opened https://gitlab.wikimedia.org/repos/releng/gitlab-settings/-/merge_request... [09:17:48] I donยดt really see what it's doing on beta [09:17:49] <_joe_> wait one sec [09:17:58] waiting [09:17:59] <_joe_> I want to look at that git directory [09:18:40] the repo doesn't seem to be in that node's puppet catalog though: https://puppet-compiler.wmflabs.org/output/942646/42724/deployment-deploy03.deployment-prep.eqiad1.wikimedia.cloud/prod.deployment-deploy03.deployment-prep.eqiad1.wikimedia.cloud.pson.gz [09:21:46] <_joe_> jnuche: sorry I'm having some issues accessing the cloud bastion for some reason [09:22:03] cgoubert@deployment-deploy03:/srv/deployment-charts/.git/objects/pack$ ls -l | wc -l [09:22:04] 38692 [09:22:08] times 552K [09:22:12] That's a lotta files [09:22:34] yup [09:24:00] That's all tmp_pack files though [09:25:02] o/ not sure what the status of logspam-watch is, but since there was some concerns on slack a couple of weeks ago around a noisy rt-testing on parsoid, just wanted to mention that we've had a very noisy rt-testing again on friday, so if that pops up there, it's safe to ignore :) [09:26:25] ihurbain: thanks for the heads-up! gonna cross-post that to slack [09:26:52] thanks :) [09:27:19] git fsck complains about broken links all over [09:27:34] Honestly I think all of it needs to die in a fire and get recloned [09:27:55] I like your style [09:28:02] But I'm also questioning why that clone is there in the first place [09:28:27] Is that jenkins host running ci for deployment-charts ? [09:28:35] <_joe_> no [09:28:41] afaik there's no beta deployments of deployment-charts [09:28:42] <_joe_> that is the deployment server for beta [09:28:43] so wth [09:29:04] maybe there was some attempt in the past to run some K8s stuff there? no idea [09:29:08] mebbe [09:29:26] <_joe_> no [09:29:33] <_joe_> it's just the puppetization I guess [09:30:08] probably yeah [09:30:12] <_joe_> and indeed it seems to be stuck in may [09:30:27] _joe_: On a git template commit from alex [09:30:33] I say we say it's his fault [09:30:34] the node doesn't seem to be a `role::deployment_server::kubernetes` AFAICS though [09:30:35] :p [09:59:01] (03PS1) 10Robert Vogel: Add new test dependency to BlueSpicePageAccess [integration/config] - 10https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/943514 [10:00:33] (03CR) 10CI reject: [V: 04-1] Add new test dependency to BlueSpicePageAccess [integration/config] - 10https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/943514 (owner: 10Robert Vogel) [10:02:37] 10GitLab (Pipeline Services Migration๐Ÿค), 10collaboration-services: Move micro sites from Ganeti to Kubernetes and from Gerrit to GitLab - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T300171 (10LSobanski) [10:03:56] 10Phabricator, 10Release-Engineering-Team (Radar), 10DBA, 10Data-Persistence-Backup, and 2 others: phabricator->phorge migration - database handling - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T335080 (10LSobanski) @brennen How's this going, do you need anything else from us or Data Persistence to proceed? [10:20:06] 10GitLab (Project Migration), 10Release-Engineering-Team (Escape Goats๐Ÿ), 10collaboration-services: Sync ldap/ops users to group on GitLab and define permissions for repos/sre - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T343035 (10LSobanski) [10:34:59] jnuche: hi, how's the beta job looking? (only now seen it was failing) [10:38:47] TheresNoTime: I think it should recover once I free some disk space [10:38:56] _joe_: what do you think? chart-ago delenda est? [10:39:13] <_joe_> jnuche: please go on [10:39:19] thx [10:39:30] <_joe_> something broke there in ways I don't understand [10:39:51] yeah, it's pretty weird [10:40:13] 10Beta-Cluster-Infrastructure: deployment-deploy03 /srv at 100% usage - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T343114 (10TheresNoTime) [10:40:24] ^ just for the record I guess [10:41:45] TheresNoTime: thanks, gonna update that ticket [10:45:32] * TheresNoTime should have checked https://www.isbetabroken.com /j [10:46:16] 10Beta-Cluster-Infrastructure: deployment-deploy03 /srv at 100% usage - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T343114 (10jnuche) Deleted `/srv/deployment-charts` to free some space. `.git` dir there had grown to 14G. The repo wasn't puppetized as far as I could see and hadn't gotten any new commits from the remote... [10:47:06] 10Beta-Cluster-Infrastructure: deployment-deploy03 /srv at 100% usage - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T343114 (10jnuche) After deletion: ` jnuche@deployment-deploy03:/srv$ df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on udev 3,9G 0 3,9G 0% /dev tmpfs 799M 81M 718M 11%... [10:47:42] 10Beta-Cluster-Infrastructure: deployment-deploy03 /srv at 100% usage - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T343114 (10jnuche) 05Openโ†’03Resolved a:03jnuche [10:49:39] *that* is going to be a big `beta-code-update-eqiad` run.. [10:52:15] Yippee, build fixed! [10:52:15] Project beta-code-update-eqiad build #454854: 09FIXED in 3 min 51 sec: https://integration.wikimedia.org/ci/job/beta-code-update-eqiad/454854/ [10:52:35] neat! [10:52:55] thanks jnuche! :D [10:53:03] !log reenabled beta-code-update-eqiad job after freeing up some disk space. See: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T343114 [10:53:05] Logged the message at https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Release_Engineering/SAL [10:53:13] np! [10:57:12] 10Beta-Cluster-Infrastructure, 10Release-Engineering-Team (Escape Goats๐Ÿ): deployment-deploy03 /srv at 100% usage - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T343114 (10jnuche) [11:06:43] (03CR) 10Jforrester: [C: 03+2] Disable the build pipeline in zuul for datahub [integration/config] - 10https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/942689 (https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T341194) (owner: 10Btullis) [11:08:31] (03Merged) 10jenkins-bot: Disable the build pipeline in zuul for datahub [integration/config] - 10https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/942689 (https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T341194) (owner: 10Btullis) [11:09:33] !log Zuul: [analytics/datahub] Mark as archived, moved to GitLab in T341194 [11:09:35] Logged the message at https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Release_Engineering/SAL [11:09:36] T341194: Migrate analytics/datahub pipeline to GitLab - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T341194 [11:16:10] !log jjb: Manually deleted ~30 jjb definitions for analytics/datahub, plus the now-empty datahub view in Jenkins, for T341194 [11:16:12] Logged the message at https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Release_Engineering/SAL [11:16:13] T341194: Migrate analytics/datahub pipeline to GitLab - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T341194 [11:16:45] 10GitLab (Project Migration), 10Release-Engineering-Team (Priority Backlog ๐Ÿ“ฅ), 10Data Engineering and Event Platform Team, 10Data-Platform-SRE: Migrate analytics/datahub pipeline to GitLab - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T341194 (10BTullis) Oh, I'm getting a crashloop from the mce-container: It looks l... [11:38:49] 10GitLab (Project Migration), 10Release-Engineering-Team (Priority Backlog ๐Ÿ“ฅ), 10Data Engineering and Event Platform Team, 10Data-Platform-SRE, 10Patch-For-Review: Migrate analytics/datahub pipeline to GitLab - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T341194 (10CodeReviewBot) btullis opened https://gitlab.wiki... [13:00:26] Yippee, build fixed! [13:00:26] Project beta-scap-sync-world build #114135: 09FIXED in 1 min 28 sec: https://integration.wikimedia.org/ci/job/beta-scap-sync-world/114135/ [13:18:01] 10GitLab (Project Migration), 10Release-Engineering-Team (Priority Backlog ๐Ÿ“ฅ), 10Data Engineering and Event Platform Team, 10Data-Platform-SRE, 10Patch-For-Review: Migrate analytics/datahub pipeline to GitLab - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T341194 (10CodeReviewBot) btullis merged https://gitlab.wiki... [13:59:15] 10Release-Engineering-Team (Escape Goats๐Ÿ), 10Release, 10Train Deployments: 1.41.0-wmf.20 deployment blockers - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T340248 (10Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE) ##### Risky Patch! ๐Ÿš‚๐Ÿ”ฅ * **Change**: https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/c/mediawiki/core/+/940328 * **Summary**: ** Refactoring in... [14:29:00] (03PS2) 10Robert Vogel: Add new test dependency to BlueSpicePageAccess [integration/config] - 10https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/943514 [15:04:50] dduvall: I opened an MR for appending PYTHONPATH in blubber https://gitlab.wikimedia.org/repos/releng/blubber/-/merge_requests/49. I'm pinging here as it seems I can't add a reviewer on gitlab [15:12:05] 10GitLab (Auth & Access), 10Release-Engineering-Team (Radar), 10CAS-SSO, 10Infrastructure-Foundations, and 4 others: migrate gitlab away from the CAS protocol - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T320390 (10CodeReviewBot) dancy merged https://gitlab.wikimedia.org/repos/releng/gitlab-settings/-/merge_request... [15:13:17] 10GitLab (Infrastructure), 10collaboration-services: Fix gitlab-runner registration token in gitlab-runners wmcs project - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T342654 (10LSobanski) a:03eoghan [16:12:07] 10Release-Engineering-Team (Priority Backlog ๐Ÿ“ฅ), 10Phatality: Link to git blame URLs for each stracktrace frame reported by Phatality - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T342400 (10dduvall) 05In progressโ†’03Resolved [16:12:42] 10GitLab (Project Migration), 10Release-Engineering-Team (Priority Backlog ๐Ÿ“ฅ), 10Data Engineering and Event Platform Team, 10Data-Platform-SRE: Migrate analytics/datahub pipeline to GitLab - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T341194 (10BTullis) This is now done. We have fully deployed the new images genera... [16:13:09] isaranto: excellent! i'll have a look. re: "can't add a reviewer on gitlab" what do you mean by that exactly? [16:16:27] dduvall: I cannot edit the reviewers field on the MR to add someone (permissions issue). I don't know if what I'm saying makes sense but most of the times I just assign someone through there. Anyway I can always mention someone in a comment [16:19:03] isaranto: oy. that's annoying and strange. brennen do you happen to know why ^ would be. afaict it only should take higher than a guest role to assign a reviewer. from https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/user/permissions.html "Merge requests: Assign reviewer โœ“ โœ“ โœ“ โœ“" [16:19:53] (that paste is probably not helpful since the roles are not present) [16:19:54] isaranto: is the person you're trying to add as a reviewer a member of the project? [16:20:14] oh, it's blubber, so... hrm. [16:22:18] brennen: yeah it is dduvall. it is not that I cannot add him, I cannot edit the field on the MR at all. [16:22:50] yeah, just checking this out by impersonating your account [16:22:59] and sure enough. [16:24:57] my guess is that this is just because you're not a member of repos/releng/blubber. [16:25:25] (or any of its parent groups.) [16:25:47] that sure is a profoundly annoying limitation for the fork-and-merge-request workflow. [16:27:15] Hey releng - interesting container infoleak issue here: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T343138. I subbed your team and added thcipriani and brennen. [16:32:26] I don't know what the policy is but all wmf engineers could be part of a group which can automatically be added to all repos as developer. Just thinking out loud here :) [16:40:43] brennen: My guess is that it's because dduvall is not a member of https://gitlab.wikimedia.org/isaranto/blubber [16:42:34] sbassett: thanks! [17:22:34] dancy: i don't think that's it. isaranto is trying to edit an MR under repos/releng/blubber so wouldn't that be about his access to one of those groups in the hierarchy? [17:23:10] seems like we should be granting everyone at least Reporter access [17:24:41] ah, yeah, that makes sense. [17:24:48] instance wide, or at least to `/repos` [17:26:24] still seems a bit broken the way it's currently behaving, however. if someone is allowed to create an MR under a project in the first place, shouldn't they be able to assign a reviewer? [17:26:43] i suppose the alternative would be to have bots handle that [17:35:54] i have a feeling that dropping everyone into /repos would have side effects we'd rather avoid. [17:36:28] ...although maybe there's a default level of access for active users we could tweak? [17:50:28] is there? i can't seem to find one [17:50:35] I don't think so. [18:14:07] isaranto: just released a new blubber (v0.19.0) that includes your change. add `# syntax=docker-registry.wikimedia.org/repos/releng/blubber/buildkit:v0.19.0` to the first line of your `.pipeline/blubber.yaml` to give it a whirl [18:15:16] dduvall: awesome! I'll try it out first thing in the morning. Thanks a lot! [18:16:34] np. thanks for the feature! [18:28:56] hrm, have to be a reporter to even see the list of merge requests https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/user/permissions.html it would be nice to be able to configure that somewhere. Seems like something I'm able to do without any permissions in GitHub land, even. [18:30:33] seems like there are sometimes two sides to permissions in the gitlab world (1) user role (2) repo settings re:what a user role is allowed to do [18:30:56] and then some of these things hard-set are instance-wide [18:36:18] thcipriani: i believe role is a relation of member, so to affect the role of a user in relation to a group/project, there has to be a membership of some sort [18:40:11] right, a role is a relation of a member to a project. And in some cases a roles's permissions within a project are set on the project-level and in some cases on the instance-level. Like what role can merge to a protected branch is set on the project level vto be either maintainer or developer s. what role can delete a project is set on an instance level as owner [18:41:37] so, yeah, in order to view merge requests or assign a reviewer , according to the docs, you need to be a reporter on the project [18:42:57] the places to tweak that could be on the instance level: i.e., what role is allowed to list merge requests by default; at the project level what role is allowed to list merge requests; or maybe it's just hard-coded [18:44:29] anyway: you're right we'd need to add folks as *something* maybe we have leeway in the specific role [18:45:29] and maybe we can tweak the specific role set in ๐‘› places where ๐‘› is between 0 and 3 [18:48:47] anyway, mostly this is ranting about having to give people a relation to a project for them to even see a list of merge requests: that seems like a weird decision. [20:19:08] Some of y'all may enjoy Yuvi's most recently published tool: https://werecomputersamistake.com/ [20:36:31] very nice [20:45:13] haha [20:46:54] hearty endorsement. [20:48:12] I read that as "we're computer's mistake" and was expecting some sci-fi [20:57:02] My brain keeps seeing were-computers-ami-stake too. I have AWS brain worms! [20:59:58] (03PS1) 10Ahmon Dancy: Review access change [dumps] (refs/meta/config) - 10https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/943593 [21:02:41] (03Abandoned) 10Ahmon Dancy: Review access change [dumps] (refs/meta/config) - 10https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/943593 (owner: 10Ahmon Dancy) [22:15:36] PROBLEM - Check systemd state on doc2002 is CRITICAL: CRITICAL - degraded: The following units failed: rsync-doc-host-data-sync.service https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Monitoring/check_systemd_state [23:13:08] RECOVERY - Check systemd state on doc2002 is OK: OK - running: The system is fully operational https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Monitoring/check_systemd_state [23:35:20] 10GitLab (Project Migration), 10Release-Engineering-Team (Priority Backlog ๐Ÿ“ฅ), 10Data Engineering and Event Platform Team, 10Data-Platform-SRE: Migrate analytics/datahub pipeline to GitLab - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T341194 (10thcipriani) >>! In T341194#9052367, @thcipriani wrote: >>>! In T341194#...