[00:29:15] It adds a comment saying "Ack" and marks the comment thread as resolved. Not sure who thought that was a necessary one button action. :) [00:30:07] Many clicks will be saved [00:31:40] Wait, so my joke guess was right? [00:31:42] lol [00:35:30] Pretty sure it is "Ack" as in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ACK_(TCP) and not "Ack! as in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_the_Cat [00:36:52] Hi all, is there an efficient way to use the API to check the use of a certain template (i.e. get a list of pages where a specific template is being used)? [00:37:23] Daniuu, https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/API:Embeddedin [00:38:30] * bd808 wonders if ACN is in part an NLP -> API bot :) [00:39:05] bleep bloop [00:39:08] Ah, that was my other interpretation, but from the common use of "ack" in #-operations I figured it was meant in the "heck" sense. [00:39:29] i believe it's generally both when responding to an incident [00:39:34] ack [00:40:23] lol, acn [00:40:34] bah [00:41:07] I still like the idea of a "heck" button to respond to a code review comment, so that'll be my interpretation :P [00:41:12] AntiComposite: thank you very much (our old archiving bot on nlwiki died, so I'm now exploring future ways to develop a new one in the future) [00:44:07] perryprog, I'm pretty sure gerrit's "be positive" reminders wouldn't like that [00:44:22] Daniuu: It might be easier to ask one of the many archiving bot owners to expand to nl instead of creating a whole new bot [00:44:52] hm. Is acknowledging something you missed not positive? [00:45:00] Er, is it negative, to be specific? [00:45:08] p858snake: thanks for reporting this. I should for completeness mention that the bot also did a lot more things, so we'll see :) [00:45:30] there's lots of bots on lots of wikis doing lots of things ;D [00:45:50] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:ArchiverBot https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:SpBot are the common cross-wiki archivers [00:49:10] Thanks :) [01:20:48] Pretty sure Pywikibot has a standard archivebot [02:13:39] that too [16:01:19] Hello, I would like to ask about the policy of including extensions that have not been used in other WMF projects. I would like to discuss on pl.wikinews the inclusion of the Approved Revs extension. However, I received information that so far no one has included this extension in any other project. If the discussion is successful, could the [16:01:20] extension be included on this wiki? [16:02:06] Why not flagged [16:02:10] Flagged revs [16:02:20] My understanding is they are quite simmilar [16:02:44] I know it shouldn't be deployed to more places but I doubt you'd get anywhere any faster with approved revs [16:02:58] (Not a Sysadmin but in short I doubt you'd get it) [16:03:03] urbanecm: ^ [16:03:36] RhinosF1: we currently aren't deploying flaggedrevs to any new wikis [16:03:45] Yeah :) [16:03:59] majavah: and I doubt approved revs would be any better [16:04:18] The last line is the sum up [16:04:42] My point is more are you picking approved revs because we don't allow flagged revs or because of a different feature [16:06:01] Basically any extension that's deployed needs to have an adequate level of maintenance. Unfortunately, since Wikimedia sites are in the top 10, it's more difficult than for other wikis :-) [16:06:25] See the extension documentation says at the top of the page in a red warning box: "Flagged Revisions is very clunky, complex and not recommended for production use, despite the "stable" tag. See phab:T185664." :-) [16:06:26] T185664: Code stewardship review: FlaggedRevs - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T185664 [16:08:39] part of the reasons we don't deploy it to more wikis :)) [16:18:25] So I understand that the ApprovedRevs extension has no chance of being included? [16:19:54] I wouldn't say "no chance" [16:20:46] the challenge would be finding people willing to do the work for https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Writing_an_extension_for_deployment [16:20:58] which would be difficult indeed [16:22:03] as AntiComposite says :) [16:28:01] Ok, thank you for your help :] [23:10:20] [[Tech]]; 77.140.106.198; /* Le code LaTeX ne passe plus dans les titres des tables des matières des pages de mes travaux de recherche et des pages de discussion associées */ new section; https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?diff=22333962&oldid=22317528&rcid=20655806 [23:12:18] [[Tech]]; Guillaume FOUCART; /* Le code LaTeX ne passe plus dans les titres des tables des matières des pages de mes travaux de recherche et des pages de discussion associées */; https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?diff=22333966&oldid=22333962&rcid=20655813