[00:15:48] Very curious how https://www.reddit.com/r/todayilearned/comments/1169jj0/til_there_were_no_former_us_presidents_alive_at/ found and posted a link to the beta cluster [00:55:15] [[Tech]]; 45.232.32.23; [none]; https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?diff=24589075&oldid=24577878&rcid=26417196 [00:55:20] [[Tech]]; Tropicalkitty; Undid edits by [[Special:Contributions/45.232.32.23|45.232.32.23]] ([[User talk:45.232.32.23|talk]]) to last revision by ArchiverBot; https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?diff=24589078&oldid=24589075&rcid=26417201 [02:24:22] legoktm: Yeesh, 10.7k upvotes. I'd wager that's probably the most traffic the beta cluster has seen in a bit. [07:26:42] " Төркем:Татар телендәге фильмнар [[Төркем:Татар телендәге фильмнар]] бар " is shown as " Төркем:Татар телендәге фильмнар бар "  in [07:26:42] https://tt.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A2%D3%A9%D1%80%D0%BA%D0%B5%D0%BC_%D0%B1%D3%99%D1%85%D3%99%D1%81%D0%B5:%D0%A2%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%B0%D1%80_%D1%84%D0%B8%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%BC%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%80%D1%8B [07:26:59] is that a bug? [07:31:21] double clicking on a cell in https://tt.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A2%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%B0%D1%80_%D1%82%D0%B5%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B4%D3%99_%D1%83%D0%B9%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%B3%D0%B0%D0%BD_%D0%BD%D3%99%D1%84%D0%B8%D1%81_%D1%84%D0%B8%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%BC%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%80_%D0%B8%D1%81%D0%B5%D0%BC%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%B3%D0%B5?veaction=edit  does not open the cell [07:31:21] for editing, and scrolls the page. in firefox 109.0.1 in linux mint . there was such bug several years ago and closed. in phabricator. [07:32:07] i am updating system and will try with newer ff and after system restart [08:06:06] same, in ff 110.0 [08:06:51] should i report 2 bugs for these? [15:56:03] Hi, is there a simple way to purge cache for all pages using a specific template ? [16:00:43] that depends on how many pages use that template [16:05:08] heh [16:05:15] Has it recently been edited? [16:12:40] In fact we had a va [16:13:09] In fact we had a vandalism on a template page that is included in a lot of other pages. And it replaces the preview image of all pages. [16:13:43] The wrong image is still displayed because of the cache. I was looking for a way to purge cache for all these pages [16:15:39] that'll be a purge with `forcerecursivelinkupdate`, right? Need to use the API(Sandbox) for that, https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/API:Purge#API_documentation [16:16:41] yes [16:16:52] though it is ratelimited for good reason, be careful with it [16:31:47] Ok, thank you very much for the information. I would not risk to break something so I will ask someone more "techy" than me on frwiki ! [16:40:48] Hi folx, I've got a question re CentralAuth, with the premise that I know very little about CA itself. AIUI, the extension makes a distinction between global and local usernames, and treats them differently. Is this correct? And if yes, how are the two related, and can they ever be different? TIA! [16:48:00] If someone here is interested in learning how KrinkleBot auto-protects images from wikipedia main pages on Commons, there's a request from ur.wikipedia.org that needs a config patch https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Krinkle#Auto-protect_for_urwiki Details at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:KrinkleBot and https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/g/labs/tools/fileprotectionsync [16:53:12] Daimona: not exactly.. excluding maybe some very obscure unification related states (which you won't see in production) a single global account will not have any attached local accounts with a different name [16:54:00] do you have anything specific in mind? [16:57:16] Thanks! That is still a possibility in theory though, right? [16:58:09] I'm asking specifically because I'm using central user IDs (and, by extension, CentralAuth) in the CampaignEvents extension to implement a few features that need usernames. I need to be certain whether a username is global/local and whether the two can be treated as the same thing [16:58:43] I'd say yes [17:01:59] Nice, thank you :) [17:36:12] Krinkle: I may have misread your message as "can someone do this please" ^^' (either way, https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/c/labs/tools/fileprotectionsync/+/890494) [17:37:59] TheresNoTime: it's what I meant yes, to get some exposure/familiarity beyond myself. [17:42:32] oh I see, well that's good then :) [17:45:44] next time could do a deployment as well if you like. didn't do it this time as I just noticed it's borked. will get it in shape for next time if there's a next time :) [17:46:03] https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Auto-protected_files/wikipedia/ur is up [17:46:44] sure thing ^^ [17:47:56] hm.. seems {{Protected}} isn't doing its usual thing of warning me that it should be protected [17:48:41] {{Auto-protected files gallery}} -> {{Protected}} -> default: (I'm expecting) Unprotected pages using protection templates [17:51:00] doeos https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Auto-protected_files/wikipedia/ur need to be protected manually? [17:52:56] I will eventually [17:53:11] it's brand new subpage [17:53:18] right now I'm wondering why the warning and autocategorisation to detect this isn't working [17:53:47] Ive narrowed it down to this producing no output: [17:53:54] {{ifsandbox ||
xxx
}} [17:54:01] .. and it's not because it goes with the first condition [17:54:15]
xxx
gets stripped? [17:56:27] https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Sandbox&oldid=734214393 [17:56:44] OK, I have to end here, will get back to it after work. [17:56:51] Feel free to dig in anyone else :)