[09:16:41] <Amir1>	 My biggest concern is that it conditions users to click through security warnings even more. Otherwise, I think it'd be nice to get rid of OCSP and CRL which they never really worked without massive downsides
[10:42:19] <wikibugs>	 10netops, 06DC-Ops, 06Infrastructure-Foundations: Take advantage of 10Gb NICs in the new network stack - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T360297#10283802 (10cmooney) >>! In T360297#10276313, @ayounsi wrote: > @cmooney @Papaul What do you think of: > # Keeping the new script presented previously for the "ea...
[13:05:47] <wikibugs>	 10netops, 06Infrastructure-Foundations, 06SRE: ganeti1025 VMs unresponsive Nov 1 2024 - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T378809 (10cmooney) 03NEW p:05Triage→03Medium
[13:34:04] <wikibugs>	 10netops, 06Infrastructure-Foundations, 06SRE: ganeti1025 VMs unresponsive Nov 1 2024 - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T378809#10284072 (10cmooney)
[14:27:19] <wikibugs>	 10netops, 06Infrastructure-Foundations, 06SRE: ganeti1025 VMs unresponsive Nov 1 2024 - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T378809#10284231 (10CDanis) I'm pretty confident this is the same as T348730, and I think it would be okay to return ganeti1025 to service and close this task as a dup
[14:35:13] <wikibugs>	 10netops, 06Infrastructure-Foundations, 06SRE: ganeti1025 VMs unresponsive Nov 1 2024 - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T378809#10284244 (10cmooney) 05Open→03Resolved a:03cmooney >>! In T378809#10284231, @CDanis wrote: > I'm pretty confident this is the same as T348730, and I think it would be ok...