[07:21:05] <wm-bb>	 <Ameisenigel> Happening in Room Ohrid in 40 minutes: https://wikimania.eventyay.com/2024/talk/QRGFTM/
[07:29:01] <wm-bb>	 <Sannita> (re @Ameisenigel: Happening in Room Ohrid in 40 minutes: https://wikimania.eventyay.com/2024/talk/QRGFTM/)
[08:10:23] <wm-bb>	 <EdwardBetts> 2399
[08:10:29] <wm-bb>	 <Juanman2> 4291
[08:10:33] <wm-bb>	 <Galder> 8934
[08:11:30] <wm-bb>	 <real68er> 145R
[08:12:19] <wm-bb>	 <real68er> A214
[08:12:51] <wm-bb>	 <real68er> 1220
[08:13:13] <wm-bb>	 <Nicolas> Welcome everyone!
[09:20:10] <wm-bb>	 <Sannita> welcome welcome! :)
[22:17:31] <wm-bb>	 <amire80> Only now I am noticing something that I should have noticed in December 2022.
[22:18:22] <wm-bb>	 <amire80> This famous page: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Abstract_Wikipedia/Google.org_Fellows_evaluation_-_Answer
[22:18:22] <wm-bb>	 <amire80> I skimmed it back then, but not thoroughly enough.
[22:18:40] <wm-bb>	 <amire80> This part is very curious: "As an aside, we gently disagree that large numbers of Lua scripts being manually copied to other wikis is necessarily a sign of Scribunto having “been successfully adopted”, so much as generally being an example of the existing anti-pattern of smaller communities often needing to manually copy large sections of other wikis’ meta-content
[22:18:40] <wm-bb>	 just to r <clipped message>
[22:18:40] <wm-bb>	 <amire80> eplicate a single citation template, infobox, or other moderately complex content presentation. A shared resource for all of this work could indeed be a great boon, but is outside the scope of the Abstract Wikipedia team."
[22:21:38] <wm-bb>	 <amire80> In May 2020, however, it was in the scope.
[22:21:42] <wm-bb>	 <amire80> https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Abstract_Wikipedia/Tasks&oldid=20045297
[22:22:16] <wm-bb>	 <amire80> When did the scope change?
[23:18:38] <wm-bb>	 <dpriskorn> It didn't 😅
[23:18:39] <wm-bb>	 <dpriskorn> See Task P1.13 in the current version. (re @amire80: When did the scope change?)