[00:56:09] Your work will help those that only speak Portuguese, but just want to program. (re @caiohm: I don't understand anything about programming, I just want to translate. hehehe) [01:22:08] Wikifunctions will serve the concept of Abstract Wikipedia, right? Or is it the Abstract Wikipedia? Another question: Will this serve to make all Wikipedias unified and language-independent? If so, is there any demonstration? [01:41:55] We do not know what the end result will be. Wikipedia will probably stay language-dependent for quite a while. It might get unified or it might not, there's too many unknowns right now. [01:43:50] The goal is that we will create an abstract structure that can be rendered into a valid and grammatically correct encyclopedia article for all the different languages Wikipedia supports. [11:57:18] The performance of Wikifunctions has improved dramatically. It does appear, though, that the performance of JavaScript has improved more than Python. A new test Z18910 multiplying a list of ten prime numbers has a duration below one second in JavaScript but over six seconds in Python (a factor of around 7) Python uses less CPU overall, however. For shorter lists, Python [11:57:18] performa [11:57:18] nce is much more similar to JavaScript (a factor below 2), which suggests to me that type conversion in Python may account for much of the difference. [11:57:19] πŸ₯³ We can do better, but this is fantastic progress! Many thanks to the team πŸ™ [13:45:24] Hehe, glad the performance boost was noticed! More details in this week's weekly :). (re @ πŸ₯³ We can do better, but this is fantastic progress! Many thanks to the team πŸ™) [16:15:45] One question: is AI, deep learning being used in this project? Sorry for this question, I really don't know. [16:17:04] no Abstract Wikipedia is not supposed to rely on machine learning (re @caiohm: One question: is AI, deep learning being used in this project? Sorry for this question, I really don't know.) [16:17:16] the functions are written by humans (re @caiohm: One question: is AI, deep learning being used in this project? Sorry for this question, I really don't know.) [16:22:40] Sure. Every function has to be translated manually, right? Does this mean that until Wikipedia realizes the full potential of Wikifunctions, millions of functions will have to be created and translated manually by then? [16:37:06] actually, Abstract Wikifunctions can be seen as the opposite of IA πŸ˜‰ (re @mahir256: no Abstract Wikipedia is not supposed to rely on machine learning) [16:38:05] Strange wording but I would say yes (re @caiohm: Sure. Every function has to be translated manually, right? Does this mean that until Wikipedia realizes the full potential of Wi...) [19:12:01] I hope that naming and describing functions (and composing edit summaries) will be early uses of natural language capabilities, so perhaps the manual translations will be in the thousands rather than the millions. Perhaps… πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ (re @caiohm: Sure. Every function has to be translated manually, right? Does this mean that until Wikipedia realizes the full potential of Wi...) [23:41:47] Z10174: I can't edit πŸ˜• [23:43:52] now it works. sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't, I don't understand. [23:44:15] Did it display an error message when it was not working? [23:48:27] "You do not have permission to edit a ZFunction that has a ZImplementation attached." (re @scienced90: Did it display an error message when it was not working?) [23:49:55] now is Z10184 [23:52:39] Same message?