[04:48:30] Good, CAPTCHA boy [04:48:43] Good, CAPTCHA bot [08:18:44] Call me when it gets deployed (re @vrandecic: No. As David said, "Still planning to deploy MR 249: Ingest more statements when fetching lexemes, etc. on Wednesday.") [12:53:05] Still P5186 isn't returned [13:51:51] @athulvis to respond to your on-wiki question, you need to create a composition implementation. Calling ZObjects in non-composition implementations is planned for the future [13:52:50] Hallo [13:53:31] There's this recently added message: `wikilambda-special-functionsbytests-summary` [13:53:46] It gives an example of a search: [13:53:47] Find all Functions that have less than 2 connected tests: Upper limit: 2, Test connection status: Connected [13:54:19] What are "Upper limit" and "Test connection status"? References to other messages? [13:54:51] There's `wikilambda-special-functionsbytests-form-status`, which is "Test connection status:", so it may be that. [13:55:08] I think this is T377909 (re @amire80: There's this recently added message: wikilambda-special-functionsbytests-summary) [13:57:43] I don't see a message that is just "Upper limit". There is `wikilambda-special-functionsbytests-form-max`, which is "Upper limit of matching tests:" [13:58:18] Perhaps their wording should be consistent? [13:59:25] Also, why are they quoted within `

` tags? Do they appear as code or as typed input? Or do they appear as usual form labels?
[14:16:51] 	  What I would suggest you do is take something like your districts in Kerala function and turn it into a function that can accept any string as input, and make the name more broad, then create another function with a composition that just calls your other function with you string as one of the inputs (re @Feeglgeef: @athulvis to respond to your on-wiki question, you
[14:16:51] 	 need to create 
[14:16:51] 	   a composition implementation. Calling ZObjects in non-composit...)
[14:17:47] 	  any examples/tutorials on this, so that I can follow? (re @Feeglgeef: @athulvis to respond to your on-wiki question, you need to create a composition implementation. Calling ZObjects in non-composit...)
[14:18:25] 	  Got it.. As in is a chemical element function... (re @Feeglgeef: What I would suggest you do is take something like your districts in Kerala function and turn it into a function that can accept...)
[14:23:44] 	  I'm not sure, perhaps WF:Introduction has something? (re @athulvis: any examples/tutorials on this, so that I can follow?)
[14:24:43] 	  This recording, though it's long, has somewhat of an example of us creating one (re @Sannita: The recording of yesterday's Volunteer's Corner is on Commons: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Abstract_Wikipedia_Volunt...)
[14:25:11] 	  I'd also recommend you join the next one, on December 9
[16:13:13] 	  Thank you.. (re @Feeglgeef: I'd also recommend you join the next one, on December 9)
[17:57:38] 	  I’m getting one for L17322 now 🎉 (re @cvictorovich: Still P5186 isn't returned)
[18:27:00] 	  Z20159 has been created as a new type. Feel free to play around and let me know if there are any issues we can address before the newsletter goes out!
[21:31:43] 	  P0
[21:33:20] 	  I've created a renderer and parser for it. I don't remember the ZIds but I pinged you on-wiki (re @vrandecic: Z20159 has been created as a new type. Feel free to play around and let me know if there are any issues we can address before th...)
[21:38:58] 	  The parser is pretty liberal in what it accepts. You can enter "2847_+$(38jfkebe5+BCE28472rixjenskgkw)" and it will output 284738528472 BC
[22:01:28] 	  Can't we just get the conjugation from the forms? (re @cvictorovich: P5186 is needed!)
[22:14:44] 	  Can we get a time for it now (and that be put on the main page) (re @Sannita: Next one will be on December 9, we'll see if we can move it a little bit earlier to accomodate other people)
[22:22:36] 	  `🙏 Z20167 occurs twice in the `implementation list for Z20166 😎 (re @vrandecic: Z20159 has been created as a new type. Feel free to play around and let me know if there are any issues we can address before th...)
[22:23:21] 	  part of (or similar to) T379873 (re @Al: 🙏 Z20167 occurs twice in the implementation list for Z20166 😎)
[22:23:44] 	  I'll fix it manually though
[22:27:08] 	  They are Z20192 and Z20198. You can comment at Talk:Z20192 (re @Feeglgeef: I've created a renderer and parser for it. I don't remember the ZIds but I pinged you on-wiki)