[01:30:32] I've closed @u99of9's RfA as successful but someone else will need to actually make the request [05:59:33] Done: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Steward_requests/Permissions#99of9@wikifunctions [06:01:35] Thanks 🙏 (re @Ameisenigel: Done: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Steward_requests/Permissions#99of9@wikifunctions) [11:16:11] @vrandecic What do you think about [[Talk:Z13937#c-Bunnypranav-20250307132700-DVrandecic_(WMF)-20240613014800]] [14:20:11] 👏Permanent! 🎉 (re @Ameisenigel: Done: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Steward_requests/Permissions#99of9@wikifunctions) [17:58:53] @Csisc1994 I can't find that message now, but I remember that a few weeks ago, you mentioned in this group, or maybe in some other, that you think that the Abstract Wikipedia syntax is going to be Wikimedia's response to LLMs, or something along these lines. You also said that you are writing a paper about it, or something like this. Am I making this up, or did you [17:58:54] actually say it? [18:04:37] this? (re @Csisc1994: I have a viewpoint about how to include Wikidata and Wikifunctions in the game of LLM.) [18:52:03] Yes. Is there anything new about this? [20:12:58] Yes, I said this. (re @amire80: @Csisc1994 I can't find that message now, but I remember that a few weeks ago, you mentioned in this group, or maybe in some oth...) [20:13:16] The Paper will be sent for peer review to an IJCAI workshop. [20:14:54] The Paper [20:15:48] From our analysis, it seems that the Wikifunctions syntax can have its place in the game. [20:17:11] The IJCAI Reviewers had positive opinions about the idea. However, they judged that the Results are preliminary and are not good enough for the main track.