[00:06:11] <wm-bb>	 <u99of9> I just got stuck on another function needing this. I think it's quite important to wider use of lexeme senses. (re @David: oh, I see.  We have a ticket for creating the Lexeme sense component (T388750), but so far it seemed more like a nice to have ra...)
[02:27:26] <wm-bb>	 <u99of9> Here's one for your list that I think should be achievable within the timeout limit: Z22855 (re @David: Thanks for calling this out.  I've added this case to a list (currently just in a team document AFAIK) of Wikidata-object-relate...)
[02:32:21] <wm-bb>	 <u99of9> Has anyone already submitted or is anyone planning a Wikifunctions-related proposal?  I'm interested in collaborating or at least not duplicating. I won't be going in person, but have previously sent in videos or livestreamed. (re @Bustria: Calling Innovators in Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions: Share Your Vision at Wikimania 2025!
[02:32:21] <wm-bb>	 <u99of9> Wikimania 2025 is fast approac...)
[05:55:43] <wm-bb>	 <David> Yes, that's the plan as it currently stands. (re @u99of9: This question will also apply to the new enum types. I assume the answer is "no", and that these types will only have one key (t...)
[08:42:22] <wm-bb>	 <Sannita> The team will submit the usual "State of Wikifunctions" and then a workshop to work on functions, if you want to submit anything that would be great! Let us know if we can help (re @u99of9: Has anyone already submitted or is anyone planning a Wikifunctions-related proposal?  I'm interested in collaborating or at leas...)