[09:13:24] <wm-bb>	 <Al> I didn’t mention T37008 because it’s in progress (but only for Map function, not Filter, which has never been raised, as far as I know). (re @Al: Yes… T367005 should go without saying (though I’ll say it) but T370028 will need some thought. We can only untype a list current...)
[09:14:08] <wm-bb>	 <Al> T370028, even 🙄 (re @Al: I didn’t mention T37008 because it’s in progress (but only for Map function, not Filter, which has never been raised, as far as ...)
[09:21:42] <wm-bb>	 <Al> In T390226#10697540 I didn’t mention T367005 because that’s in progress (but only for Map function; the same change seems appropriate for Filter too). (re @Al: Yes… T367005 should go without saying (though I’ll say it) but T370028 will need some thought. We can only untype a list current...)
[09:30:30] <wm-bb>	 <Al> Ah, good. I put something in the ticket and it’s probably a good idea to check it out. (re @u99of9: It looks like I didn't need quite as much typing and untyping as was in the version you commented on. But I agree it's worth bei...)
[09:41:24] <wm-bb>	 <SvetaT23> did it rename from wikifunctions to abstract wikipedia ?
[09:43:18] <wm-bb>	 <Jan_ainali> No, they are different, but related, concepts. (re @SvetaT23: did it rename from wikifunctions to abstract wikipedia ?)
[11:13:26] <wm-bb>	 <Nicolas> simply said: Wikifunctions is the tool, Abstract Wikipedia is the goal (re @SvetaT23: did it rename from wikifunctions to abstract wikipedia ?)
[17:25:27] <wm-bb>	 <Feeglgeef> Not really (re @Nicolas: simply said: Wikifunctions is the tool, Abstract Wikipedia is the goal)