[14:55:12] Currently, functions are called from wiki pages by writing `{{#function:` followed by a ZID. Is there a plan to allow a more human-readable way to do it, using a name rather than a ZID? [15:43:21] Also, is it possible to have named arguments, or only positional? [16:25:07] They are only positional at the moment :-/ (re @ Also, is it possible to have named arguments, or only positional?) [19:16:59] Is there a plan to include them in the future? (re @wmtelegram_bot: They are only positional at the moment :-/ (re @ Also, is it possible to have named arguments, or only position...) [19:24:26] No plans at the moment, but feel free to propose the feature! (re @ Is there a plan to include them in the future? ) [21:24:34] Let's say that I want to reimplement the iconic "citation needed" template as a wikifunction. I can't use small fonts, superscript, or a link, but let's ignore that for the sake of this question. [21:24:35] What is the best way to translate the "citation needed" text so that the template will be usable in a wiki in any language? (Considering, of course, that someone bothered to translate it.) [21:25:52] I can think of using the Abstract Wikipedia capabilities of loading lexemes and declining them using other grammar functions, but that's kind of too complicated, at least at this point. [21:49:09] I don't have an authoritative answer, but I think that string could be considered a form of abstract content (re @ What is the best way to translate the "citation needed" text so that the template will be usable in a wiki in any language? (Considering, of course, that someone bothered to translate it.)) [21:49:58] There's an ongoing discussion about where abstract content should be stored :-/. Once that's resolved, this should be straightforward. I agree that, for this kind of case, it makes more sense just to store a string than to try to do NLG.