[01:00:08] <wm-bb>	 <u99of9> I like your idea and think it will be useful for debugging other things too, so I've copied it into a function. Z27057 (re @dvd_ccc27919: Could also be true, but I think that the debug log for Z26297 (in particular look the testcase Z27041) is strong evidence for co...)
[04:20:19] <wm-bb>	 <u99of9> Same in the JS Z25998. Even when the debug is not even interrogating the quantity. (re @Al: Yes, but an initial debug in Z25997 gives no output for tests like Z26852, just a Z24 and Z511. To me, that suggests that the fa...)
[04:56:45] <wm-bb>	 <u99of9> I tried to do this to fix the negative multiplier cases for Z26977. But it refused to publish "Unable to publish. Please try again." : https://tools-static.wmflabs.org/bridgebot/28ef4c62/file_72489.jpg
[05:35:50] <wm-bb>	 <u99of9> I chose a simpler test case to write up as a bug report T401162 (re @u99of9: Same in the JS Z25998. Even when the debug is not even interrogating the quantity.)
[23:31:06] <wm-bb>	 <u99of9> It seems to me that I'm having to nudge individual tests to get a proper cache refresh instead of just nudging the overall function. (re @Al: Thanks for the disentangling! There seems to be a remaining issue with Z13740. The code implementations were mostly failing with...)
[23:51:24] <wm-bb>	 <u99of9> Z27171 passes, but when I copy the exact same input into "Try this function" it returns void