[04:59:31] I haven't looked into it yet, and can't right now, but I'm getting some new error behaviour at Z27983 (e.g. for me the first test "Details" are unclickable) [06:15:49] I'm still seeing issues. I'm not sure if it's from the cache: Z14200 : https://tools-static.wmflabs.org/bridgebot/219f9bfb/file_73608.jpg [06:16:09] oops, I mean Z14280 [07:01:59] Yep. Caching issue. I've resolved nudging it (re @u99of9: I'm still seeing issues. I'm not sure if it's from the cache: Z14200) [08:00:14] Ah, that’s a stubborn one! I can’t see a workaround, so I’ve added a comment to *T403671* for now. (re @u99of9: I haven't looked into it yet, and can't right now, but I'm getting some new error behaviour at Z27983 (e.g. for me the first tes...) [09:27:39] Hi all! Our next *Volunteers' Corner* will be held on Monday, September 8, at 17:30 UTC (https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1757352600). [09:27:40] If you have questions or ideas to discuss, or you want to get in touch with the dev team, please join us! The link to the meeting is https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw [09:27:41] Hope to see you there! [09:27:45] (re @Sannita: Hi all! Our next Volunteers' Corner will be held on Monday, September 8, at 17:30 UTC. [09:27:46] If you have questions or ideas to discus...) [13:59:04] PS after the error behaviour is fixed, do you mind if we change the expected output format for that first test to a full string of decimal digits, rather than exponential notation? (re @Al: Ah, that’s a stubborn one! I can’t see a workaround, so I’ve added a comment to T403671 for now.) [18:46:15] I wasn’t sure back in January and I’m still not sure! Personally, I prefer not having to count up all the zeroes but I’m open to persuasion. May I just mention *T395792*…? (re @u99of9: Can we return an actual decimal string? (e.g. "0.00000000000000012246468") The first test requires exponential notation, which w...) [18:47:05] *T403834* (re @Al: Ah, that’s a stubborn one! I can’t see a workaround, so I’ve added a comment to T403671 for now.)