[00:49:42] I'm happy to have one function for each and one for pretty combinations, but the pretty one should probably have a parameter to specify where the cutover occurs. (re @Al: I wasn’t sure back in January and I’m still not sure! Personally, I prefer not having to count up all the zeroes but I’m open to...) [00:53:37] I haven't been involved in that conversation function because I consider it too ad hoc. My grand plan will be to use Wikidata quantities and qid-based unit conversion, together with the precision-preserving I've been working on to limit the length of the output to the "correct" number of significant figures (as implied by all the inputs). How that final quantity is [00:53:37] rendered can b [00:53:38] e configurable. (re @wikilinksbot: T395792 – Usability: Conversion functions sometimes output values with a lot of decimal places [open]) [09:47:00] I just worry about your final sentence… I’d duplicate the case under the correct function, but I don’t see that the inverse of Z21814 currently exists. Until now, I was supposing that Z21796 would be the function that would allow an unlimited string of zeroes after the radix character whereas Z21787 would have a five-zero limit (like Python does, as configured). Future [09:47:00] conf [09:47:01] iguration would allow this limit to vary (presumably in a new function). [09:47:02] As you suggested, we can leave the test as it is for the time being, but I’m happy to change it once its equivalent is in place. (re @u99of9: I haven't been involved in that conversation function because I consider it too ad hoc. My grand plan will be to use Wikidata qu...) [09:54:03] Thanks. I think I must have merged Z21796 and Z21787 in my mind. I'm happy for them to stay distinct. Let's just write the five 0 rule into the description. [09:55:10] We can adjust the names too. (re @u99of9: Thanks. I think I must have merged Z21796 and Z21787 in my mind. I'm happy for them to stay distinct. Let's just write the five ...) [09:55:45] Yes that will help me not to make the same mistake again. (re @Al: We can adjust the names too.) [12:39:23] For me, Wikimedia sites are extremely slow to load right now, Wikifunctions unusable. [12:57:13] I was using Wikidata not too long ago, it seems normal (re @u99of9: For me, Wikimedia sites are extremely slow to load right now, Wikifunctions unusable.) [13:07:53] it seems a fair bit better now