[09:52:13] I just came up with a better name for the project than what I suggested: Wikigenlang shorted to WG or WGL [09:52:14] It ditches the multilingual and Wikipedia and focus on what the project is about: generating written language (content). [09:52:16] @vrandecic I think you should restart the naming contest with clear branding and trademark guidelines because we didn't really have any good proposals to compete with Wikigenerator that works from a branding perspective now that Wikicore was dropped. [09:52:17] WDYT? [09:59:53] If one can't accept results like Boaty McBoatface in a naming contest (that is, not "good proposals"), it shouldn't be framed as a contest at all. [10:04:17] We could call it community brainstorm 😀 (re @Jan_ainali: If one can't accept results like Boaty McBoatface in a naming contest (that is, not "good proposals"), it shouldn't be framed as...) [11:20:24] Actually I wonder one thing: what would happen if all of the current 5 naming proposals become unsuitable in terms of legal and branding aspects after a vigorous post-voting legal and branding inspection later on? [11:21:20] that's why we already did a brand and legal evaluation of the first 7 names [11:21:33] and no, we cannot reopen the first phase, that's done [11:22:46] it was the legal evaluation that disqualified one of the six finalists, and the 7th name that we wanted to recover from the first phase (re @Sannita: that's why we already did a brand and legal evaluation of the first 7 names) [11:26:34] Is the 7th name WikiNexus? [11:38:35] I would suggest to follow the Wikimedia project naming convention though, either [11:38:35] Wiki`[lowercase]` [11:38:37] (Wikifunctions instead of WikiFunctions) [11:38:38] or [11:38:40] `[ucfirst]`-Wiki. [11:38:41] (Meta-Wiki instead of MetaWiki) [11:38:43] Also need to consider the translation difficulty [11:38:44] and not to make the name being confused with other existing things. [11:38:46] (not to distinguish something by no-space or uppercase, e.g., Wikicore/WikiCore would be confusing for no-whitespace-word-separator languages) [11:38:47] (e.g. "wiki核心"/"Wiki核心" → "wiki core"/"core of the wiki" → "MediaWiki core"?) [11:47:16] no, Wikiblueprint (re @acanthamoeba_castellanii: Is the 7th name WikiNexus?) [11:54:37] Owh yeah I almost forgot it [12:11:54] I'm interested in the foundation for this statement. [12:11:55] I suggest you reconsider. [12:11:56] The current proposals are all suboptimal if you ask me. (re @Sannita: and no, we cannot reopen the first phase, that's done) [12:17:46] I think all the proposals were suboptimal, including my own 😏 (re @Npriskorn: I'm interested in the foundation for this statement. [12:17:47] I suggest you reconsider. [12:17:49] The current proposals are all suboptimal if you ...) [12:53:14] I am not a creative person, so I don't think that my proposals on the first round are optimal too 😌 [12:53:56] Wikilambda (just kidding) [12:56:24] I am actually fond of the name Wikilambda, although it might be suboptimal to someone [13:05:26] We could name the logo "Wikilambda" though. [13:05:33] 😂​ [20:50:13] I'm not sure if it helps to say, but I would not vote for these, even if they had been included. (re @Npriskorn: I just came up with a better name for the project than what I suggested: Wikigenlang shorted to WG or WGL. [20:50:14] Wikicontent is also a...)