[08:22:40] There were more than 100 proposals, and more than 500 votes in the first round, which was open for several weeks to come up with the names. I don't see sufficient indication that the new names such as Wikigenlang you just came up with one week before the closing of the second round of the process would warrant stopping the whole process and restarting it again. (re@ [08:22:40] Npriskorn: I' [08:22:40] m interested in the foundation for this statement. [08:22:41] I suggest you reconsider. [08:22:43] The current proposals are all suboptimal if you ...) [08:22:44] I am also sad that Wikicore was removed, but the process is intentionally set up in a way that it is robust if individual proposals get removed. That's why everyone can vote for as many proposals as they want in the first round, and that's why we have a ranking mechanism in the second round. [08:25:24] Given that two of the remaining top 5 options are legally known to be safe (due to their inclusion of a strong existing trademark), we can safely predict that this will not happen. (re @acanthamoeba_castellanii: Actually I wonder one thing: what would happen if all of the current 5 naming proposals become unsuitable in terms of legal and ...) [08:38:01] I know, the one with the Wikipedia in it, right? [08:38:13] correct [12:45:22] @genocation What are you working on at Z30009? It looks like this will take the Z30000 ZID. That seems a bit premature because the rest of us were up to Z29735, and also spoils the fun a bit. [12:59:53] Oh dear! this was my mistake with using the wrong API. I will see how to fix it. [13:18:54] I've restored the latest zid pointer back to Z29736 so that new objects get still added following the order of things. Now the team will be working on a solution for moving the objects back in line. Big apologies!! [22:11:44] Speaking of Z30000, does anyone have something amazing in mind that we can try to drop when the time comes?