[03:29:15] <wm-bb>	 <u99of9> https://youtu.be/ViOkEYQLggM Here is the WF/AW one on Youtube. I'll get it to Commons soon. (re @Feeglgeef: Oh, I forgot about those! Are they on Commons yet?)
[04:23:06] <wm-bb>	 <Feeglgeef> Thank you! (re @u99of9: https://youtu.be/ViOkEYQLggM Here is the WF/AW one on Youtube. I'll get it to Commons soon.)
[04:39:13] <wm-bb>	 <u99of9> There's probably nothing in there that you don't know! But having read the paper referenced in this week's newsletter, I realised that people's perceptions of the project depend heavily on the language we use about it. I hope I didn't claim anything too grandiose. (re @Feeglgeef: Thank you!)
[04:48:57] <wm-bb>	 <Feeglgeef> I've watched it through and I agree, nothing new. I'd consider it accurate though, thanks for giving it! (re @u99of9: There's probably nothing in there that you don't know! But having read the paper referenced in this week's newsletter, I realise...)
[05:57:11] <wm-bb>	 <u99of9> Also available on Commons at [[:commons:*File:Wikifunctions in practice - Toby Hudson - WikiConAU-2026.webm]]* (re @u99of9: https://youtu.be/ViOkEYQLggM Here is the WF/AW one on Youtube. I'll get it to Commons soon.)
[08:34:07] <wm-bb>	 <NicolasVIGNERON> lol :D(page now deleted) : https://tools-static.wmflabs.org/bridgebot/5dade079/file_79703.jpg
[11:48:46] <wm-bb>	 <Csisc1994> https://tools-static.wmflabs.org/bridgebot/b4603744/file_79707_oga.ogg
[11:49:04] <wm-bb>	 <Csisc1994> https://tools-static.wmflabs.org/bridgebot/7aaa6007/file_79708_oga.ogg
[11:54:51] <wm-bb>	 <Feeglgeef> They're actually not, there was one before them (re @NicolasVIGNERON: lol :D
[11:54:51] <wm-bb>	 <Feeglgeef> (page now deleted))
[12:53:19] <virinas-code>	 How is recursion performance in composition? Should it be avoided?
[12:55:24] <wm-bb>	 <u99of9> I think it's decent, and we need it for lots of simple compositions
[12:55:45] <wm-bb>	 <Al> It’s not too bad, especially if there is a literal tail call. (re @wmtelegram_bot: <virinas-code> How is recursion performance in composition? Should it be avoided?)
[12:56:07] <wm-bb>	 <u99of9> There used to be a depth problem but that seems not to be a big problem anymore.
[12:57:21] <wm-bb>	 <u99of9> One good thing about WF is that it automatically uses the best implementation. So you might as well put a recursive one in, and if it's best, it will win.
[12:59:20] <wm-bb>	 <u99of9> But remember that the recursive call will call the current favoured implementation for depth 1 and further, so the performance metrics aren't solely reflective of the recursive composition.
[13:05:05] <wm-bb>	 <u99of9> Make sure to add some tests that require decent depth so the performance is measured for a good range of situations.
[15:06:14] <wm-bb>	 <sunmem> thanks. I am User:Sun8908 😊 (re @Ameisenigel: Done)
[17:08:54] <virinas-code>	 i still have troubling wrapping my head around the lack of lambdas 
[17:08:59] <virinas-code>	 (in composition language)