[07:32:30] <wm-bb>	 <davidsantamariame> This is one of the goals of *abstract-data* tool, in the URL for that article https://abstract-data.toolforge.org/article/Q7093205 you can find what are the missing lexemes for that article and a call to action for updating it (similarly you can find what are the missing Wikidata labels, and language implementations), what would be your definition of
[07:32:30] <wm-bb>	 conveniently? What could be a <clipped message>
[07:32:31] <wm-bb>	 <davidsantamariame>  potential improvement to this? (re @amire80: @vrandecic , a feature that conveniently shows what are the missing lexemes for a given article in a given language would be my ...)
[17:52:00] <wm-bb>	 <empresstty> 2207
[18:33:27] <wm-bb>	 <amire80> Thanks. Two immediate comments:
[18:33:28] <wm-bb>	 <amire80> 1. Make it work well on phones. Currently it appears to be completely broken. (re @davidsantamariame: This is one of the goals of abstract-data tool, in the URL for that article https://abstract-data.toolforge.org/article/Q7093205...)
[18:34:02] <wm-bb>	 <amire80> 2. Change it into a MediaWiki extension so that it would be a real feature, with real internationalization, with real integration with the rest of the Wikimedia world, with real support for updates and deployments, etc. It should be a real part of the product and not some external thing to which no one is committed.
[18:34:26] <wm-bb>	 <amire80> I'll take a deeper look later when I'm on a computer.
[18:56:36] <wm-bb>	 <Feeglgeef> See more (unrelated) complaints about the tool here (re @Feeglgeef: I had a look at the source repo for the data tool, and, don't you know it, it was made by a robot. I at least appreciate that yo...)
[19:11:50] <wm-bb>	 <dvd_ccc27919> Some random ideas: is there a proposal to introduce warnings in Wikifunctions? Something like logs, but logging insances of Z5 instead of strings? It could become very useful in the future for diagnostics in Abstract Wikipedia