[00:00:08] Except for around 100, I've not actually nominated any for CSD via bot yet. [00:00:46] It's all been editors making the nominations by hand. [00:34:29] I've been poking at in my free time. [01:06:40] Since I'm the operator on HB#T1, I'm keeping my hands mostly clean of the G13 nominations. [01:07:35] I made the userbox to help poke at the drafts. [01:08:18] Hrm... start working on HB#3 or do some evaluation by hand.... [01:08:29] !wlh User:Technical_13/Userboxes/G13 [01:08:30] http://enwp.org/Special:WhatLinksHere/User:Technical_13/Userboxes/G13 [01:10:18] I prefer not to have a bot mass nominate... I think it would overload the admins. I also am strongly against a bot mass deleteing them because I think too many are savable. [01:11:18] Oh the bot's not going to mass nominate, just push the nominated count up to around 50 and then wait for space to clear out [01:11:57] And checking if there's space every N hours (at this point I'm thinking 4) [01:23:03] Frackit... I need to fix the AFCH problem [01:32:33] !useremail Fredy [01:32:33] Fredy can be emailed from: http://enwp.org/Special:EmailUser/Fredy if they have email enabled. [01:33:39] Hrm... Do you suppose it's possible to go from "Missina an AFC template" straight to Accept? [01:33:57] Bah... Should cover all the bases just to be safe [01:35:13] Sure you can. [01:35:39] You can accept an unsubmitted draft. [01:35:57] Just make sure the creator knows [01:36:25] Splicing the fix from Issue 82 (in removing the defect category) over to the other forms that AFCH could interact with the article) [01:37:36] I've lost track of progress on the scriptbutton be honest. So many cooks work in the same kitchen bouncing all over the plave. [01:37:51] It's Issue 98 [01:37:57] to blathe? [07:44:08] !g13 [07:44:09] Are you bored? Try saving a few http://enwp.org/Category:G13_eligible_AfC_submissions or nominate them for deletion! Keep track of how many eligible drafts there are with {{User:Technical_13/Userboxes/G13}} [07:44:09] !categorysize G13 eligible AfC submissions [07:44:09] [[Category:G13 eligible AfC submissions]] contains 20678 items. [11:56:52] !G13 [11:56:52] !categorysize Candidates for speedy deletion as abandoned AfC submissions [11:56:53] [[Category:Candidates for speedy deletion as abandoned AfC submissions]] contains 26 items. [12:40:36] !G13 [12:40:36] !categorysize Candidates for speedy deletion as abandoned AfC submissions [12:40:37] [[Category:Candidates for speedy deletion as abandoned AfC submissions]] contains 37 items. [12:40:43] !g13 [12:40:43] Are you bored? Try saving a few http://enwp.org/Category:G13_eligible_AfC_submissions or nominate them for deletion! Keep track of how many eligible drafts there are with {{User:Technical_13/Userboxes/G13}} [12:40:43] !categorysize G13 eligible AfC submissions [12:40:44] [[Category:G13 eligible AfC submissions]] contains 20698 items. [13:02:37] Change on 12en_wikipedia a page User:Technical 13/vector.js was Technical 13, changed by https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=567675011 link cleanup a little edit summary: $6 [13:09:15] !ve [13:09:16] You can find help for your VisualEditor related question from the VE developers themselves on #mediawiki-visualeditor [13:34:45] Change on 12en_wikipedia a page Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Helper script was APerson, changed by https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=567678603 link /* Developers */ edit summary: $6 [13:37:37] Change on 12en_wikipedia a page User talk:Technical 13 was APerson, changed by https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=567678903 link /* A barnstar for you! */ new WikiLove message edit summary: $6 [14:12:37] Change on 12en_wikipedia a page User:Technical 13 was Technical 13, changed by https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=567682735 link {{User:Technical_13/Userboxes/Browser|o|15.0.1147.153}} edit summary: $6 [14:16:21] Change on 12en_wikipedia a page User:Technical 13/Feedback was Technical 13, changed by https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=567683125 link /* August */ +1 edit summary: $6 [14:17:40] Change on 12en_wikipedia a page User:Technical 13/Feedback was Technical 13, changed by https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=567683270 link /* August */ ce edit summary: $6 [14:42:11] Change on 12en_wikipedia a page User:Technical 13 was Technical 13, changed by https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=567686133 link {{User:Technical_13/Userboxes/Browser|chrome|28.0.1500.95 m}} edit summary: $6 [14:48:44] Change on 12en_wikipedia a page User:Technical 13/common.js was Technical 13, changed by https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=567686870 link Possible fix for determining OS version on all browsers except FF (which worked right the first time) edit summary: $6 [14:53:50] Change on 12en_wikipedia a page User:Technical 13/common.js was Technical 13, changed by https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=567687436 link Didn't help on Chrome... edit summary: $6 [14:54:28] Change on 12en_wikipedia a page User:Technical 13 was Technical 13, changed by https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=567687523 link {{User:Technical_13/Userboxes/Browser|ff|23.0}} edit summary: $6 [15:09:57] Change on 12en_wikipedia a page User:Technical 13/common.js was Technical 13, changed by https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=567689339 link Chrome should know the browser now (and maybe its version) edit summary: $6 [15:15:19] Change on 12en_wikipedia a page User:Technical 13/common.js was Technical 13, changed by https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=567690034 link Debugging... edit summary: $6 [15:19:01] Change on 12en_wikipedia a page User:Technical 13/common.js was Technical 13, changed by https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=567690500 link Debugging... edit summary: $6 [15:21:09] Change on 12en_wikipedia a page User:Technical 13/common.js was Technical 13, changed by https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=567690760 link Let's make it work on common.js too... edit summary: $6 [15:22:50] Change on 12en_wikipedia a page User:Technical 13/common.js was Technical 13, changed by https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=567690987 link Let's add the code in for Opera... edit summary: $6 [15:27:58] Change on 12en_wikipedia a page User:Technical 13/common.js was Technical 13, changed by https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=567691691 link Case... grr edit summary: $6 [15:29:57] Change on 12en_wikipedia a page User:Technical 13/common.js was Technical 13, changed by https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=567691925 link Shuffles some stuff around... edit summary: $6 [15:31:54] Change on 12en_wikipedia a page User:Technical 13/common.js was Technical 13, changed by https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=567692183 link Browser and version for Safari? edit summary: $6 [15:40:57] Change on 12en_wikipedia a page User:Technical 13/common.js was Technical 13, changed by https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=567693293 link MSIE? edit summary: $6 [16:06:02] Change on 12en_wikipedia a page User:Technical 13/common.js was Technical 13, changed by https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=567696313 link Screen Resolution modifications... edit summary: $6 [16:13:33] Change on 12en_wikipedia a page User:Technical 13/common.js was Technical 13, changed by https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=567697093 link " vs. ' edit summary: $6 [16:44:05] !joke [16:44:17] !learn joke Heck, even I got that one... Hahaha... -_- [17:27:54] Change on 12en_wikipedia a page User:Technical 13/common.js was Technical 13, changed by https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=567705559 link screenResolution isolated to prevent errors. edit summary: $6 [19:41:14] Change on 12en_wikipedia a page User:Technical 13/common.js was Technical 13, changed by https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=567721756 link Links don't work in titles. edit summary: $6 [19:48:50] Change on 12en_wikipedia a page User:Technical 13/common.js was Technical 13, changed by https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=567722783 link Old Windows in FF no go... edit summary: $6 [20:14:59] Change on 12en_wikipedia a page User talk:Technical 13/2013/3 was MiszaBot III, changed by https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=567725722 link Robot: Archiving 2 threads from [[User talk:Technical 13]]. edit summary: $6 [20:15:03] Change on 12en_wikipedia a page User talk:Technical 13 was MiszaBot III, changed by https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=567725729 link Robot: Archiving 2 threads (older than 31d) to [[User talk:Technical 13/2013/3]]. edit summary: $6 [20:18:50] Change on 12en_wikipedia a page User:Technical 13/common.js was Technical 13, changed by https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=567726181 link phonetics... edit summary: $6 [21:49:06] Change on 12en_wikipedia a page User talk:Technical 13 was Technical 13, changed by https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=567736955 link Notification: speedy deletion nomination of [[Talk:Global warming conspiracy theory/Archive 6]]. ([[WP:TW|TW]]) edit summary: $6 [21:49:16] Change on 12en_wikipedia a page User talk:Technical 13 was Technical 13, changed by https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=567736975 link Notification: speedy deletion nomination of [[Talk:Global warming conspiracy theory/Archive 5]]. ([[WP:TW|TW]]) edit summary: $6 [21:49:17] Change on 12en_wikipedia a page User:Technical 13/Logs/CSD was Technical 13, changed by https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=567736978 link Logging speedy deletion nomination of [[Talk:Global warming conspiracy theory/Archive 6]]. ([[WP:TW|TW]]) edit summary: $6 [21:49:41] Change on 12en_wikipedia a page User:Technical 13/Logs/CSD was Technical 13, changed by https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=567737022 link Logging speedy deletion nomination of [[Talk:Global warming conspiracy theory/Archive 5]]. ([[WP:TW|TW]]) edit summary: $6 [22:28:55] !categorysize G13 eligible AfC submissions [22:28:56] [[Category:G13 eligible AfC submissions]] contains 21828 items. [22:29:00] *cackles* [22:30:04] You do it th hard way.. [22:30:13] !G13 [22:30:13] !categorysize Candidates for speedy deletion as abandoned AfC submissions [22:30:14] [[Category:Candidates for speedy deletion as abandoned AfC submissions]] contains 29 items. [22:30:23] !g13 [22:30:23] Are you bored? Try saving a few http://enwp.org/Category:G13_eligible_AfC_submissions or nominate them for deletion! Keep track of how many eligible drafts there are with {{User:Technical_13/Userboxes/G13}} [22:30:24] !categorysize G13 eligible AfC submissions [22:30:24] [[Category:G13 eligible AfC submissions]] contains 21827 items. [22:30:39] So yeah.. [22:30:51] I didn't need all of that, just the G13 eligible count. [22:30:51] I responded to your G13 question. [22:31:03] !g13 [22:31:03] Are you bored? Try saving a few http://enwp.org/Category:G13_eligible_AfC_submissions or nominate them for deletion! Keep track of how many eligible drafts there are with {{User:Technical_13/Userboxes/G13}} [22:31:03] !categorysize G13 eligible AfC submissions [22:31:03] [[Category:G13 eligible AfC submissions]] contains 21827 items. [22:31:22] 5 key pushes.. [22:31:55] I saw. The context is Anne nominating directly from the "Missing an AFC submission template" for G13 (which the bot is only recently adding the category) [22:33:07] I want to try and give every last potential article a by the book 6 months, plus I'm concerned about the admin doing their diligence and declining the G13 because technically it wasn't 6 months since the last edit date. [22:35:21] Yeah... I think G13 should only be for abandoned declined submissions. [22:36:13] Which forces the draft through at least 3 reviews before deletion. [22:38:29] I originally was on the "Everything needs to be positively evaluated" boat, but I'm more on the "Make it a draft of the creator" boat due to the fact that it feels like we're forcing them to take a submission review. [22:39:11] Also I got my first "Please undelete my stale AFC draft" nag at my talk page on behalf of the bot. [22:41:09] I wouldn't be opposed to some additional wording to let people know they can pull their draft out of AfC and put it in their userspace. [22:48:36] Hrm... Question: If in the course of my nag bot going through and poking the article and nagging the creator, I have a seperate message for registered editors alerting them that they can request Userfication whould that be better for you? [22:51:15] Would be a start.