[00:01:20] It was "/wiki", I changed it to "/w" and it's now working. Thanks! :) . [00:01:37] *Simetrical double-checks the instructions in the manual page [00:01:45] I'm also noticing the pages come up much faster than when it was brokken. [00:02:03] Heh, they didn't load for me at all before. [00:02:44] I'm also double-checking the instruction, again (which, I guess, technically means that I'm triple-checking, but, whatever). [00:02:45] Hmm, I see. It assumes $wgScriptPath was already set automatically in the installation. [00:03:11] Did you explicitly change it before? Or maybe install and then move the files? [00:03:20] Yup. I only see it mention setting $wgArticlePath and $wgUsePathInfo. [00:04:15] I've had the wiki up for a long time. I orginally installed it to /wiki/, so when I was shortening the URLs, I was only needing to get rid of the "index.php" part. I moved the wiki/ dir to w/. [00:04:33] Right. It was still generating links for the old path. [00:04:40] yup. [00:04:46] So not a typical situation. [00:05:18] Although, maybe the default $wgScriptPath should be the directory of LocalSettings.php. Hmm. [00:05:24] I think maybe a note should go in those instructions to change that if you're "converting" from your first installation. After all, I didn't know you could make this change until after I had been using the wiki for a few months. [00:05:35] Yes, that sounds like a good idea. [00:05:41] *Simetrical adds [00:08:15] Simetrical: on bug 12681, you commented about absolute positioning be used to spoof the new messages header... [00:08:27] MZMcBride, wait, don't say it. [00:08:30] It would overtype the header. [00:08:37] but absolute positioning couldn't add the necessary white space, right? [00:08:42] yeah [00:08:42] Well, you could mimic the header too. [00:08:52] Just overtype it and then add a fake header. [00:09:03] that'd be awfully intense :) [00:09:09] Shouldn't be hard. Of course you're only going to fool Monobook users in any event. [00:09:14] who cares about spoofing the new messages thing, anyway? [00:09:16] Well, the entire issue is silly. [00:09:21] at that point, personally, i'd block the user [00:09:23] We don't need to modify the software to solve this kind of "abuse". [00:09:32] does it matter? [00:09:43] It's a trivially annoying thing, and if people are bothered by it they can ban it. Not a software issue. [00:09:57] Simetrical: Thanks. I like the new note, too. :) [00:10:05] well, an easy software fix or two could make the debate moot [00:10:16] and the debate's already been had previously... [00:10:16] MZMcBride: provide a patch, we'll consider it. [00:10:25] Werdna, there is one. [00:10:30] At the moment, my understanding is that the software fix is not particularly easy. [00:10:30] !bug 12681 [00:10:30] --mwbot-- http://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12681 [00:10:34] Simetrical: ah. [00:10:41] Werdna, it just moves the usertalk thing above the header. [00:10:59] couldn't people just position their evil stuff above the header, too? [00:11:05] Yeah, that's what I said. [00:11:11] i think there''s a patch for the Username option as well [00:11:16] MZMcBride points out that would overwrite the header, so you'd have to duplicate that. [00:11:34] *Werdna shrugs. [00:11:34] Which would end up involving a lot of trickery with getting the margins right and everything. [00:11:36] they could do more CSS hackery, but it wouldn't be as simple as a single
[00:11:55] and, really, the new messages bar being in the content area doesn't really seem "right" [00:12:06] That's a more plausible reason for changing it. [00:12:15] Where do sitenotices and stuff go? [00:12:22] That seems like it should be where other notices go. [00:12:22] above the page title [00:12:30] yes, that I agree with. [00:16:23] 03(mod) CSS properties in wikitext can be abused to spam and make it difficult to remove them - 10http://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9526 +comment (10ultrablue) [00:16:35] Fatal error: Undefined class constant 'AS_MAX_ARTICLE_SIZE_EXCEDED' in /var/www/trunk/phase3/includes/EditPage.php on line 2193 [00:16:42] Hmm, I think trunk has a *slight* bug. [00:19:05] *Werdna views log [00:19:06] 03simetrical * r30135 10/trunk/phase3/includes/EditPage.php: Revert 30130, completely breaks editing with fatal PHP error. [00:19:15] Well, actually the edit went through. [00:19:19] But it's still a fatal error. [00:19:24] indeed. [00:19:57] Simetrical: I can see the problem [00:20:05] typo in the original naming of the constant [00:20:18] Yes, I noticed. [00:20:20] -const AS_MAX_ARTICLE_SIZE_EXCEDED= 229; [00:20:24] +const AS_MAX_ARTICLE_SIZE_EXCEEDED= 229; [00:21:36] 03simetrical * r30136 10/trunk/phase3/ (RELEASE-NOTES skins/MonoBook.php): (bug 12681) New messages bar should appear above page title, for consistency with other message boxes [00:21:46] 03(FIXED) New messages bar should appear above page title, for consistency with other message boxes - 10http://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12681 summary; +comment (10Simetrical+wikibugs) [00:22:18] fancypants [00:22:51] thanks Sim :) [00:26:02] 03(mod) Internet Explorer should be added to javascript browser detection globals - 10http://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12766 (10dan_the_man) [00:45:35] erm. can I use #4 at the beginning of a block without it turning into a OL, and without nowiki? [00:45:53] Image:All Souls Day-2005-Still-5050.jpg|#4: {{Death by|zombie (offscreen)}}. [00:45:57] makes a list :( [00:46:23] Probably you'd have to use nowiki. [00:46:28] ugh. [00:46:28] ok. [00:46:53] Morbus: use the &...; thing [00:47:03] hrm. possibility. [00:47:37] *Morbus frowns. [00:47:51] or you could use No. [00:48:01] that's wordy. [00:49:09] i could do just the number, i suppose. [00:49:17] Oh, yes, entities. You could use that. [00:49:20] Morbus: put a blank first? [00:49:29] *Simetrical always chuckles when he sees the template names and usages of Morbus' site [00:49:29] Duesentrieb: tried. turned it into a pre [00:49:34] Simetrical: :D [00:49:36] yes. [00:49:48] well, not quite identical to
, but close
[00:49:55] 	It is an HTML 
.
[00:50:09] 	yes, but 
 in wikitext implies nowiki :)
[00:50:15] 	indenting doesn't
[00:50:35] 	http://www.videounderbelly.com/wiki/All_Souls_Day
[00:50:37] 	if anyone is curious ;)
[00:50:44] 	nsfw
[00:51:07] 	i suppose. if your work doesn't watch R rated movies.
[00:51:10] *Morbus 	scratches head.
[00:55:01] 	yah, i guess i'll go with no # or No. or whatever.
[01:20:11] 	hey there
[01:20:13] 	again i struggle with semantic mediawiki :/
[01:20:15] 	is there any way to make more complicated queries? like using SPARQL language instead of the  statement?
[01:32:28] 	hi! I'm getting a blank page with no php errors after I click the big "Install MediaWiki!" button at the bottom of the setup script. What's wrong?
[01:32:45] 	this happens for every version I've tried, 1.11 to 1.6
[01:33:31] 	is it possible to put a html file in other syntax than :   [http://host/file.html my doc] ? my file is the document root of the wiki.
[01:33:57] 	[http://host/file.html my doc]
[01:46:38] 	so nobody knows about blank pages then?
[01:50:27] 	blank pages are PHP's way of saying "something's not quite right"
[01:52:42] 	but i get no php errors
[01:52:55] 	Hey y'all
[01:53:02] 	I'm switching from an older server to a new one
[01:53:12] 	i changed php.ini so the errors go to a file, and i tested it by writing bad php code
[01:53:18] 	The older server was running mediawiki that had started at 1.5ish, and gradually been updated to, finally 1.9svn
[01:53:22] 	and left there
[01:53:57] 	elliptic1: are you getting segfaults?
[01:53:57] 	I also had a ton of hardcoded hacks in place to support a shared user database between a bunch of wikis that symlinked the main wiki PHP code, but now I see there's a shared DB function in 1.11
[01:54:19] 	I have my shared table in standard mediawiki format, how would I go about updating it to 1.11?
[01:54:19] 	do the blank pages have headers, or does the server just close the connection?
[01:54:45] 	that is, what was the standard mediawiki format for 1.9svn.
[01:56:36] 	it's a 500 server error in IE, blank page in FIrefox
[01:57:09] 	elliptic1: is it a public URL?
[01:57:17] 	yeah
[01:57:52] 	care to share?
[01:58:00] 	exampleproblems.com
[01:58:01] 	is there a semantic mediawiki channel?
[01:58:39] 	"Firefox can't find the server at exampleproblems.com."
[01:58:43] 	oh dear
[01:59:12] 	well put in a www
[01:59:34] 	i'm doing my own dns too- i'll fix that later
[02:02:42] 	neither of your DNS servers are returning a response for me
[02:02:49] 	68.178.250.214 and 68.178.250.215
[02:04:35] 	i just changed those today- maybe it hasn't propagated out to you yet
[02:05:17] 	I'm using dig +trace, there's no propagation involved
[02:05:32] 	[0201][tstarling@zwinger:~]$ dig @68.178.250.214 www.exampleproblems.com.
[02:05:37] 	;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached
[02:06:26] 	what if you just use the ip?
[02:07:09] 	http://68.178.250.214/wiki/
[02:07:35] 	where is this blank page?
[02:08:16] 	after you fill out the set-up form and click the button at the bottom
[02:09:13] 	haa
[02:09:25] 	it was just my messed up domain name causing the problem
[02:09:30] 	it worked with my ip
[02:09:42] 	looking at testwiki and got a bit confused: what's the difference between editor and reviewer? the flagging page says when granting one the other one is granted as well. same with revoking
[02:09:46] 	ok thanks
[02:13:52] 	Danny_B, maybe editors get their revisions auto-approved, and reviewers can approve others' revisions?
[02:14:35] 	i was wondering about that
[02:27:30] 	Danny_B: what test wiki?
[02:27:47] 	there's only test wiki ;-)
[02:27:55] 	Yay, no more "argument list too long" errors in 2.6.23!
[02:27:55] 	...?
[02:28:05] 	elliottcable: testwp
[02:28:29] 	(Well, for my uname -s you'd still be limited to 2 MB.)
[02:28:43] 	elliottcable, http://test.wikipedia.org/
[02:30:04] 	Simetrical: thx, i was answering something elsewhere
[02:31:24] 	it might be feasable later to combine 'editor' and 'reviewer' into a single group on some projects? (assuming this ever gets finished)
[02:31:45] 	'flagger'
[02:31:59] 	oh they got the version verification thing working!
[02:32:04] 	Cool, time to update to svn d-:
[02:32:30] 	Splarka, sure, why not?
[02:32:41] 	Version verification thing?
[02:33:05] 	i'm glad some germ of permision manager already exists
[02:33:21] 	elliott: if you mean flagged revisions, that is only on test.wp and still in development
[02:33:40] 	(but it is in the SVN as an extension)
[02:34:54] 	Splarka: yeah, fine by me
[02:35:11] 	Splarka: I've been using the 'live preview' since it was 'still in development', and it's never had a problem for any of my users. edge ftw.
[02:35:36] 	Splarka: Thanks for pointing this out to me, I was about to update to 1.11, when I could have tasty 1.12salad instead (*-:
[02:35:41] 	don't let this happen to you: http://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12772
[02:36:33] 	so co v30105 or 20107 or later, got it d-:
[02:36:55] 	well, I mean, don't let the edge break your spirit
[02:37:06] 	the edge is sharp!
[02:38:43] 	as always.
[02:40:06] 	Did anyone tell Tim about that bug?
[02:40:34] 	03(mod) Impossible to rename or protect a page - 10http://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12772   +parser (10Simetrical+wikibugs)
[02:40:45] 	the submitter pinged him here
[02:40:48] *amidaniel 	thinks r30136 looks icky
[02:41:08] 	amidaniel, having it below the title makes no sense.
[02:41:16] 	And is inconsistent with every other message box in the software.
[02:41:25] 	What other message boxes?
[02:41:37] 	sitenotice?
[02:41:45] 	Site notice, anon notice, central site notice, AJAX watch notice.
[02:41:46] 	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Newsome&oldid=152073532 <-- there it's below the page title
[02:42:21] 	Hmm.
[02:42:23] 	Hmm .. I don't really think of them being quite of the same class, but okay
[02:42:26] 	perhaps that should move too
[02:42:30] *MZMcBride 	ducks
[02:42:31] 	NO!
[02:42:31] 	well
[02:42:34] *amidaniel 	stabs
[02:42:44] 	ones like oldid, unflagged rev, exessive page size, protect warnings
[02:42:45] 	I think of the site notice, user talk notice, and AJAX watch as all being in sort of the same category.
[02:42:49] 	those occur in ways that can't be spoofed either
[02:43:01] 	I don't think of them as the same as various warnings and info messages and so on.
[02:43:02] 	Is "spoofing" *really* a problem?
[02:43:04] 	what makes the new messages message unique is it can be spoofed if it is below the title
[02:43:04] 	No.
[02:43:08] 	Nobody cares about the spoofing.
[02:43:11] 	I do
[02:43:28] 	Well, no one with commit access does.
[02:43:35] 	the spoofing has caused considerable controversy on certain wikis...
[02:43:38] *MZMcBride 	resumes ducking
[02:43:42] 	Hehe
[02:43:43] 	We don't care.
[02:43:50] 	you don't have to
[02:43:54] 	Good :)
[02:44:11] 	I dunno, my two cents: It looks ugly. I don't know exactly why, but it just does
[02:44:31] 	I dunno, it looks fine to me.
[02:44:43] 	Could use better spacing, maybe.
[02:44:48] 	Alright, let me see if I get used to it there :)
[02:44:49] 	a user pref would be nice
[02:44:54] 	Well, it could use a lot of things :)
[02:44:55] 	Smaller margin.
[02:44:56] 	Splarka: NO
[02:44:57] *Simetrical 	stabs Splarka 
[02:45:00] 	no
[02:45:06] 	not what I mean, you're assuming
[02:45:10] 	a user pref would be nice: "[x] discrete new messages"
[02:45:27] 	which would do something like style the 'talk' link in your personal bar
[02:45:52] 	Umm .. no
[02:45:53] 	:)
[02:45:58] *MZMcBride 	isn't sure "discrete" is a verb
[02:46:11] 	
  • [02:46:30] ami: why not exactly? hmm? do you have a good reason? where is your statistical data? [02:46:40] why don't you have it flash neon colors? [02:46:43] actually, the two wouldn't have to be mutually exclusive, that class could always be added [02:46:48] and scroll across the screen [02:46:51] No new preferences. If it's a good idea, do it for everyone. [02:47:08] Simetrical: fine, just add the class to id="pt-mytalk" [02:47:13] and it can be all done in CSS ^_^ [02:47:23] Splarka: Preferences is too bloated already. It's extra and unnecessary load. It can already be customized by those who want to. [02:47:27] maybe it can make some noise too [02:47:32] really obnoxious [02:47:33] ami: see my last statement [02:47:57] pagination of undelete would be really nice... [02:48:04] MZMcBride: Grrowl [02:48:08] I've done this in js, but with a simple class, it could be done in css <3 [02:48:08] :) [02:48:15] just throwing it out there... [02:48:25] Splarka: That's easily done. File a bug [02:48:29] that is, #p-personal li.newmessages would have no styles associated [02:48:31] sure, a bug... [02:48:31] *amidaniel doesn't feel like looking at it right now [02:48:46] Wait, isn't it already in a class? [02:48:46] the digital equivalent of "here is a dime, call someone who cares" [02:48:53] Splarka: Hehe :) [02:49:52] caching in global scripts, styles and rawpages, content filenames with esacped safe extensions, onloadhooks made safe with IE and things, these are a few of my favorite things [02:50:00] http://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12773 http://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12775 http://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12720 [02:51:02] Splarka: It's already in the css class usermessage. What exactly are you looking to have added? [02:51:50] 03(mod) Impossible to rename or protect a page - 10http://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12772 +comment (10tstarling) [02:52:12] if($this->data['newtalk'] ) --- would add a class to
  • as well [02:52:27] "why?", you might ask? [02:52:42] #bodyContent .usermessage { display:none; } [02:52:43] Use JavaScript for crazy ideas like that. [02:52:45] 03simetrical * r30137 10/trunk/phase3/skins/monobook/main.css: Reduce margin for .usermessage, since it no longer needs to be set off from the article content. [02:53:16] #p-personal .usermessage {color:red;font-size:110%} [02:53:41] (well, probably a different class name so as not to conflict) [02:53:51] #p-personal .newmessages {color:red;font-size:110%} [02:54:18] that would be the css equivalent of a new pref, the .newmessages would have no default stylings, sort of like .allpagesredirect [02:56:32] amidaniel: why do you hate america? ^_^ [02:56:57] without customizability, the "terrerrists" have won! [02:57:41] america is teh nize, tey can spel and grammr good yuse, not to menshun dey r very geographimacal-litrit :P [02:58:39] *Skizzerz shudders at the "sentence" he just wrote -- eww >_> [02:59:39] 03simetrical * r30138 10/trunk/phase3/includes/DefaultSettings.php: $wgStyleVersion! [03:28:35] 03yaron * r30139 10/trunk/extensions/SemanticDrilldown/ (INSTALL includes/SD_GlobalFunctions.php): New version: 0.3.3 [03:48:08] Simetrical, TimStarling: do any of you find this photo striking ( http://www.humanities.mcmaster.ca/~dclark/derrida_lemonde.jpg ) ? [03:51:53] is there an extension that lets you make a poll with a parser hook (i think that's what it's called) [03:52:37] Yeah, a couple, most quite incomplete [03:52:54] Oh, wait, with a parser hook? I.e., a tag or the like? [03:53:40] anybody here good know anything about the api? [03:53:55] jexmex: best to just ask [03:54:12] ok [03:54:39] I was looking through the api docs for awhile today trying to figure out how to just grab a article off of the api [03:54:48] but I could not for the life of me see what the command is [03:54:51] amidaniel: yeah [03:55:02] jexmex: You're looking for list=revisions&rvprops=rvcontent or the like [03:55:11] like [03:55:13] [03:55:17] Question blah lbha [03:55:20] Choice 1 [03:55:23] Choice 1 [03:55:24] etc [03:55:24] ok, thanks [03:55:26] [03:55:34] jexmex: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/api.php?action=query&prop=revisions&titles=API|Main%20Page&rvprop=timestamp|user|comment|content [03:55:39] 03(mod) Special:Wanted pages to be removed from Wikipedias. - 10http://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12785 +comment (10danny_b) [03:55:55] chuck: you'd be wanting to process user input? [03:55:56] chuck: I think Uncyc has an extension that does that, not sure what it is called though [03:56:03] chuck: Hmm .. none that I'm aware of. Not sure if the Quiz extension could be tweaked to do this [03:56:14] that's what i was thinking about [03:56:37] Does the Quiz extension record user's results anywhere though? [03:56:39] amidaniel: i'll look at that [03:56:45] I was thinking it might just be a self-test dealio [03:56:54] *amidaniel should know .. but doesn't :) [03:57:19] it doesn't record anything [03:57:40] Alright [03:57:55] Well, there are a few polling extensions, but none of them are parser hooks [03:58:14] 03aaron * r30140 10/trunk/extensions/ConfirmAccount/ConfirmAccount_body.php: Use null type to avoid confusion and mistakes [03:58:15] uncyclopedia has one, but I can't figure out where it is coming from [03:58:24] i really want to get oversight and checkuser running on my wiki, but it's a bitch to import the new sql code into the existing wikis, then also add it to the "template" sql code for future wikis [03:58:29] Skizzerz: Oh? [03:58:31] *amidaniel looks [03:58:37] s/wiki/wiki farm/ [03:58:42] Skizzerz: that should be wikia wide [03:58:51] Splarka: more than likely [03:58:52] (but maybe not enabled on all of them) [03:58:58] but I've only seen it in use on uncyc :) [03:59:00] chuck: Doesn't the update script handle those extensions now? [03:59:07] *Splarka remembers submitting bugs about it [03:59:08] Wiki hydroponics > Wiki farms [03:59:11] amidaniel: that's another looming problem [03:59:15] ah :) [03:59:17] like, oh,