[00:00:07] hey all [00:01:50] Mike||gone: A dupe of which bug? [00:02:39] I'm looking, hence the '...' :P [00:02:59] I found https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17016 but that's not quite the same [00:04:14] Hm, seems to be the same bug. [00:04:41] 03(mod) option to block people for sending emails to OTRS - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15793 +comment (10mikelifeguard) [00:04:54] Pathoschild can do the honours. [00:06:58] 03(mod) Sanitizer rejects identifies valid xhtml attributes - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17031 +comment (10brion) [00:07:25] Mike||gone: that should probably be /from/ sending [00:08:09] 03(mod) Prettify permalinks - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16659 (10dlancaster1) [00:08:15] 14(WFM) option to block people from sending emails to OTRS - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15793 summary; +comment (10mikelifeguard) [00:12:57] 03(mod) Sanitizer rejects identifies valid xhtml attributes - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17031 (10gbruin) [00:14:24] AaronSchulz, "Move up user page noindex check" is really not a useful commit message. Why? What problem did you observe that made this seem like a good idea, and how does it fix it? Anyone reading the commit will see *what* you did. The commit message needs to explain *why*. [00:15:13] 90% of your commit messages are like that, and as far as I'm concerned, anyway, it makes it impossible for me to tell whether any of your commits do anything or make any sense. [00:16:52] 03(mod) Page creation notification email is sent when a watched page is deleted - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17016 +comment (10pathoschild+wmbugs) [00:16:54] 14(DUP) Enotif sends incorrect page-created notice on page deletion - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17030 +comment (10pathoschild+wmbugs) [00:22:30] brion: hmm tabindex acting odd on FF :/ [00:32:13] :P [00:36:23] brion: has them in the right order but doesn't get to them until after everything else [00:38:02] leons seems to have his head on the right way [00:38:34] *brion waves at TimStarling [00:38:41] hi brion [00:40:07] another hot day here today, 37 already at terrey hills [00:45:36] damn [00:45:37] that's hot [00:51:44] How often is the phrase "that's hot" actually used literally? [00:51:58] i used it today [00:53:18] literally as in using one single definition of 'hot' pertaining to temperature? [00:53:34] hello TimStarling [00:53:41] TimStarling: I made it to the office! [00:53:42] 03(mod) Prettify permalinks - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16659 (10danny.b) [00:53:47] *werdnum is learning how to use a mac. [00:53:51] well done [00:55:27] "Wanna buy this stereo?" "Nah, that's hot" "Nuh uh, I didn't steal it." [00:55:44] "Which wire can I touch? the red one? "That's hot!" "oh" [00:55:49] *TimStarling checks http://www.rfs.nsw.gov.au/dsp_content.cfm?CAT_ID=683 to make sure he's not going to get burnt down while busy programming [00:56:30] *Splarka thinks those are as literal as something like a place or time being "hot"... [00:59:04] Surely literal is more like "It was the hottest of times, it was the coldest of times..." [00:59:17] I think that's literary [00:59:55] Good point. It's LITERALLY literary. [01:00:25] i am literally metaphorically sick of misuse of "literally" [01:01:13] werdnum: what are you doing at the MW offices? [01:01:38] There are too many people who use 'literally' when they mean 'actually'. [01:01:46] Or just ''! [01:02:01] (or perhaps 'literary', if you're me...) [01:04:37] my year 9 english teacher liked to tell a story about someone using "literally" incorrectly [01:04:37] apparently someone told an assembled group of teachers that positions in a certain field had been "literally decimated" [01:04:38] divided by 10? [01:04:38] which means one in every ten had their heads cut off [01:04:38] special pages don't read the page views, are they counted to the total statistic anyway? [01:04:38] literally divided... :-) [01:04:38] p858snake: working? [01:05:03] logic tells me yes but i need ensurance ;) [01:05:09] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decimation_(Roman_army) O_O [01:07:02] in the past moths i asked the same question 3 times already. nobody seems to know :D [01:08:15] i'm calculating the daily page views for my site from Special:Statistics, so i just want to know i it's accurate [01:08:31] I just followed the instructions to set Short_URL like http://server/wiki/. How can I make apache redirect http://server/ to /wiki/ ? [01:09:17] Subfader: it may or may not be accurate, depending on your site, how it's configured, and what you're trying to count [01:10:22] e.g. i note down the total page vies number every sunday and divide the diference by 7 so i get the average page views for that week [01:11:13] Brion: Pretty damn harsh! "each group cast lots ...the soldier on whom the lot fell was executed by his nine comrades". [01:11:41] Subfader: that's probably pretty decent figure for a basic wiki site :) [01:12:11] if you want lots of details you might prefer something fancier like local log analysis or a tool like Google Analytics, though [01:12:55] 03(mod) Autolink URLs in CodeReview SVN commit messages - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17011 (10brion) [01:12:57] nah just care about that to see if interest is growing. google analytics slows down the page load [01:13:12] *nod* [01:13:24] i'm proud of my 12 million page view in 2 years :P [01:14:27] http://bytes.com/groups/css/587691-float-right-goes-next-line *stab* [01:15:11] well [01:17:13] and i don't want to install local analytics if the info i need can easily be calculated. IF every page view is counted in the total like special pages [01:17:20] and search reults etc [01:17:39] you coul dleft-float the left part [01:17:49] but honestly this is where i usually give up and make it a table ;) [01:18:17] it makes no difference for a tendence but would be nice if it's accurate. so nobody knows?? [01:18:57] brion: table makes ugly white background and tis hard to align the button the the right [01:19:11] hmm, moving a button to the right can not be this hard [01:19:41] align=right on the td? [01:19:46] borderr can be tweaked out... [01:19:53] heh [01:20:00] align=right doesn't work [01:20:14] Subfader: special pages, edits, old views etc are not counted iirc [01:20:22] kind of works with td width at 100% [01:20:23] just plain page views [01:20:41] but the table has double height, with a line of whitespace [01:21:02] i think table width 100% and then don't need to label width on the cells will do [01:21:17] that whitespace can probably be cleared out, might just be some extra paras or somethign floating around? [01:21:20] ok then Special:Statistics is very unclear about it. thanks though [01:23:05] i suppose total is just a sum of all single output view counts. [01:24:48] does special:statistics still display the little "*" symbols? [01:28:30] brion: ok, now too much space between 'save' and 'reset' [01:29:25] put them in the same cell? [01:30:08] Subfader: yeah, i believe it bumps the global page view the same time it bumps individual page counts [01:30:13] feels odd, but works [01:30:28] heh [01:30:59] kk just means more page views for me :D [01:32:27] 03aaron * r45761 10/trunk/phase3/includes/specials/SpecialPreferences.php: [01:32:27] * Convert prefsubmit div into a table to fix tab indexing [01:32:27] * Fix XHTML [01:42:22] 03aaron * r45762 10/trunk/phase3/includes/LogPage.php: Use new notifyRC2UDP() function in LogPage to avoid duplicated code [01:46:09] ok i gotta skip out for now; i'll peek back in at some point perhaps [01:46:11] see y'all [02:03:45] *TimStarling discovers ctags [02:04:13] to think I've been using gvim all this time without knowing about it [02:04:18] *Charitwo gives TimStarling a congratulatory cigar [02:04:50] shit, it's awesome [02:05:09] 03(mod) One sees a page as it appeared BEFORE an edit - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5311 +comment (10public) [02:10:49] ^^i've noticed that as well >.> [02:11:48] 03(mod) One sees a page as it appeared BEFORE an edit - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5311 +comment (10tstarling) [02:13:51] i wanted to make an extension or hack that would record when a user viewed each page in the wiki - has anyone in here done something like that? [02:14:25] i basically want to just print the date time and $wgUser [02:20:17] easiest is to make an off-site tool that serves a 1x1 pixel image [02:20:27] and then set the src to include the date/time/page/user [02:22:27] if(wgUserName) addOnloadHook(function() { [02:22:27] var bug = document.createElement('img'); bug.setAttribute('src','http://your.server/logger.php?user=' + encodeURIComponent(wgUserName)) + '&page=' + encodeURIComponent(wgPageName)) ); document.body.appendChild(bug); [02:22:27] }); [02:22:29] something like that [02:23:04] and write logger.php to echo a 1x1 px gif, and record the parameters and time [02:23:32] you could hard-code it as an extension too, that wouldn't rely on JS [02:27:42] i'm trying to get texvc working with mediawiki and i'm getting error about the math directory not beign writeable i've confirmed that wiki/math and wiki/tmp are chmod 777 and owned by apache still seeing same thing enabled debug logging [02:28:17] and it shows /math/6/f/5 as not being writeable which i don't get [02:33:17] nm figured it out [02:36:46] splarka: that's a novel idea. I thought that $wgUsername was not used anymore and replaced by the User:: class - is that true? [02:37:09] wgUserName is the javascript variable name [02:37:23] defined in the top