[00:02:12] TimStarling: morning :) [00:02:17] morning [00:03:08] hate to spring the fun on ya right off, but can you confirm if we need to forward-port the SecurePoll tweaks from http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/53208 and is that safe to just merge to trunk or does it need generalization? [00:04:05] yes they need to be ported [00:04:23] it's basically for supporting the freaky way we map non-secure domains to secure domains [00:05:42] fun fun fun [00:05:50] we'll have to make that non-freaky some time ;) [00:05:55] MrZ-man, you think r55918 can be marked as resolved? r56325 should fix it (If there isn't another bug ;)) [00:06:07] if we used /2LD/3LD/... instead of /site/language it wouldn't be necessary [00:06:20] !r 55918 [00:06:20] --mwbot-- http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/55918 [00:07:11] yeah. at this point i'd rather we just finish the native domain usage though [00:07:31] btw, I'm getting a SVN proxy error on http://www.mediawiki.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Code/MediaWiki/56150&action=purge [00:08:59] Church_of_emacs: if it's a giant diff, they're more likely to fail yes :( [00:09:13] at some point will have to clean up the access methods on that [00:09:20] ahokay, that's the reason :) [00:09:53] think so, 55918 was merged to the deployment branch, brion may want to merge the fix as well from 56325 [00:10:24] that'd be nice [00:10:29] brion: I noticed you copied wmf-deployment to wmf-deployment-work [00:10:43] so is the plan to merge everything from the trunk into there? [00:10:44] Hey, how do you make an announcement on the top of your wiki, like this wiki [00:10:44] http://www.encyclopediadramatica.com/Main_Page (its on every page) [00:11:02] misingnoglic, MediaWiki:Sitenotice or so [00:11:04] because it now sounds like you're doing it the other way around, merging everything from wmf-deployment into trunk [00:11:09] TimStarling: well i ended up giving up on a straight merge of trunk updates into wmf-deployment; there seems to have been too much stuff moved around for svn's little mind :) [00:11:15] so now i'm going the other way round, yes [00:11:27] right [00:11:30] the less i have to merge back into a fresh wmf-deployment copied from trunk, the easier it'll be :) [00:11:44] @Church of emacs - thanks =] [00:11:46] wasted a whole day last week with the damn merge :P [00:12:14] misingnoglic, we should kick you from #mediawiki for posting a link to a website that has blink tags and tens of big tags [00:12:23] TimStarling: any thought on segregating wikimedia-specific maintenance scripts into an extension or subdir or something? [00:12:28] That's the only example I could find [00:12:29] Church_of_emacs: hey, we don't kick Splarka [00:12:37] ;) [00:12:48] sounds like a good idea [00:14:58] Before you deploy it: the JS2 stuff in includes/AutoLoader.php should be commented out, the *.html files should be removed again, and also remove js2/mwEmbed/jsScriptLoader.php and mv_embed_iframe.php [00:16:12] Emufarmers: yet... :shifty eyes: [00:16:42] and when do I link people to ? [00:17:27] Well I couldn't find any more examples :/ [00:18:01] Splarka: you've linked to Uncyclopedia at some point [00:18:47] isn't whitelisted in the sanitizer, and is funny (where it is funny) [00:19:21] How do I finish and
tags, when I type and
- it shows up in the formatting and it stays like that :/ [00:19:24]
might work [00:19:39] misingnoglic: make sure all the other tags inside are closed properly [00:19:42] and also don't use those [00:19:54] use class="center" and style="font-size:150%" [00:19:55] don't use blink! Ever! [00:20:05] I would never use blink :/ [00:20:16] [00:20:29] or margin:auto; and/or text-align:center; depending on if it is block or inline [00:20:49] MrZ-man: funny story, uncyclopedia users found a bug in some parser extension tags allowing raw html by trying [00:21:10] (cuz wikia developers are (were) noobs) [00:21:18] Emufarmers: http://toolserver.org/~mzmcbride/cgi-bin/mw-logs.py?search=%3cSplarka%3e.*http://uncyclopedia [00:23:20] uncyclopedia != encyclopediadramatica [00:24:03] no shit [00:24:05] encyclopediadramatica is the page that slanders Wikimedians. Uncyclopedia is satire [00:24:16] http://toolserver.org/~mzmcbride/cgi-bin/mw-logs.py?search=%3cSplarka%3e.*dramatica [00:24:24] QQ for you [00:24:27] they have a long and deep rivalry [00:24:37] 03brion * r56350 10/trunk/phase3/maintenance/lag.php: De-Wikimedified lag.php script and merged to trunk. Still not 100% sure what the -r option is supposed to do, but it now runs. :) [00:25:21] remember that guy who posted a fake submissive girl to personals on craigslist and then posted all the private information in the emails? ed hosted that information [00:25:24] Encyclopedia Dramatica is satire too [00:25:30] that isn't satire [00:25:40] No, not that part, but lots of it is [00:25:46] TimStarling: what do you want to do with the blob scripts in http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/53318 ? [00:25:57] Wow, I started like 3 conversations :/ [00:26:17] Crude satire, maybe, but satire nonetheless (particularly the stuff about Wikipedians) [00:26:31] at one point I had 45% of all deletions ever on uncyclopedia, as one of two dozen active admins (and a late comer), because I'd stay up all night deleting vanity and slander/libel [00:27:12] they could be moved to their own directory or something [00:27:43] See the ED entry for "AAAAAAAA" [00:27:48] ED is a horrible stain to all mediawiki installations, but hey, free software ^_^ [00:27:56] Emufarmers, I won't link to certain pages I know on that Wiki, because I don't want to support ED, but imho it's for certain that most pages about Wikimedians are slander and not remotly funny [00:28:20] I didn't realize "funny" was a prerequisite for satire. [00:28:26] Just because you have (horrible) flaws that you don't want to admit to doesn't mean they aren't hilarious. [00:28:33] Emufarmers: do you find PrankNet funny? [00:29:05] Splarka: not really familiar with them [00:29:27] TimStarling: you want me to make up a dir for it or let you move them?:) [00:29:31] Well satire is supposed to be funny. If it isn't even remotly funny, it isn't satire. But I guess you could find satire everywhere if you go by the definition "someone might find it funny" [00:29:31] they're the ones responsible for the recent spat of prank phone calls making people trash hotel rooms, strip search employees, and such [00:29:32] How do you tell your friend who is a dragonball z fan about the over 9000 phenomenom? [00:30:04] you're talking about collecting the WMF-specific scripts into one directory, right? [00:30:08] Church_of_emacs: satire isn't about being funny; it's about ridicule. It being funny is a side effect. [00:30:19] are you saying there are only three of them, and it's those ones? [00:31:00] TimStarling: well those are three i happen ot have in front of me at the moment :) [00:31:28] and you want them in extensions/WikimediaMaintenance? [00:31:29] also anything else added in http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/tag/reapply or the remainders of http://www.mediawiki.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Code/MediaWiki&path=%2Fbranches%2Fwmf-deployment%2F that i haven't fully gone through yet [00:31:34] could be [00:31:38] The vicious slanders on ED are probably closer to Roman satires than most modern works are. [00:31:52] ok [00:32:05] i don't really care where they end up as long as we can figure out what's our freakish wikimedia-only stuff or else we generalize them :) [00:34:18] I've been planning a rewrite of the script loader stuff, Splarka and Nikerabbit gave me a hand yesterday [00:34:35] mostly by whining about everything! [00:34:42] whee [00:34:46] I don't think it makes sense to be linking to a PHP file for javascript, except for things that are really dynamic like site and user JS [00:35:37] we can concatenate and minify files like wikibits.js pre-deployment or pre-release [00:35:52] and then link to those static files directly [00:37:06] also, I'd like to add a dependency feature and CSS processing [00:37:14] as long as those get maintained correctly, sure [00:37:35] the examples I've looked at, such as WordPress and Google, have those features [00:38:20] Google's API looks particularly cool on the client side, I'd like to aim for something like that [00:38:50] you just give a single