[00:01:42] 03(mod) Deploy Ukrainian and Rusyn special page names - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/37402 +comment (10Sam Reed (reedy)) [00:01:49] New review: Kaldari; "(no comment)" [mediawiki/extensions/PageTriage] (master); V: 1 C: 2; - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10675 [00:01:51] Change merged: Kaldari; [mediawiki/extensions/PageTriage] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10675 [00:05:12] 03(mod) #info: produces incorrect output (1.8 alpha) - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/29683 summary; +comment (10[[kgh]]) [00:11:39] New patchset: Kaldari; "Fixing up the param buttons" [mediawiki/extensions/PageTriage] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10736 [00:12:37] New patchset: Bsitu; " use slave db when possible for page id validation" [mediawiki/extensions/PageTriage] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10737 [00:27:27] New review: Bsitu; "(no comment)" [mediawiki/extensions/PageTriage] (master); V: 1 C: 2; - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10735 [00:27:29] Change merged: Bsitu; [mediawiki/extensions/PageTriage] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10735 [00:30:31] New review: Bsitu; "(no comment)" [mediawiki/extensions/PageTriage] (master); V: 1 C: 2; - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10736 [00:30:33] Change merged: Bsitu; [mediawiki/extensions/PageTriage] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10736 [00:38:50] New review: Kaldari; "1 minor coding style issue, waiting for Krinkle's unit test before reviewing further." [mediawiki/core] (master); V: 0 C: -1; - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/8991 [00:51:29] New review: Catrope; "(no comment)" [mediawiki/extensions/ArticleFeedbackv5] (master); V: 1 C: 2; - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10543 [00:51:31] Change merged: Catrope; [mediawiki/extensions/ArticleFeedbackv5] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10543 [00:52:51] New review: Catrope; "(no comment)" [mediawiki/extensions/ArticleFeedbackv5] (master); V: 1 C: 2; - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10454 [00:52:53] Change merged: Catrope; [mediawiki/extensions/ArticleFeedbackv5] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10454 [00:58:39] New review: Catrope; "Two minor issues but looks good otherwise" [mediawiki/extensions/AbuseFilter] (master); V: 0 C: -1; - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10394 [01:04:50] 03(mod) DjVu thumbs failing - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/35895 +comment (10Amgine) [01:05:40] 03(mod) Isolate parser from database dependencies - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/25984 +comment (10_Vi) [01:30:48] Jasper_Deng: The answer is that the author put it there: https://www.mediawiki.org/w/index.php?title=Extension:Zend_Search_Lucene_for_MediaWiki&diff=next&oldid=386161 [01:36:14] Krenair could you look at #wikimedia-tech if possble? [01:36:21] http://puu.sh/zGo9 <- [01:50:07] Krenair: so should I revert? [01:50:38] No [01:50:45] But it explains why it was there in the first place [01:51:08] interesting [01:57:53] Query: Do I need to htmlspecialchars() a text area value before spitting it back as a value for for a text area? [01:58:12] 03(mod) Make expiry time for email confirmation links configurable - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/37411 (10duplicatebug) [01:58:13] 03(mod) make email confirmation code expiration time configurable - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/27159 (10duplicatebug) [02:34:24] how can I output 0.50 with #expr? [02:34:35] I want to have n many trailing zeros [02:34:51] this is to show significant figures [02:37:26] New patchset: Reedy; "Add a bit more slave waiting..." [mediawiki/core] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10738 [02:39:28] New review: jenkins-bot; "Build Successful " [mediawiki/core] (master); V: 1 C: 0; - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10738 [02:56:57] http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Firearm&dir=prev&limit=2&action=history [02:57:08] so why is it that jimbos edit shows such a massive minus? [02:57:51] That's a bug [03:19:50] can someone please suggest a very simple extension to look at which ads a text field to user extension? [03:19:59] ...a preference, I mean [03:20:20] can someone please suggest a simple extension to look at which adds a user preference with a text field in it? [03:20:27] ToAruShiroiNeko, I think that is https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36976 [03:20:51] as a starting point to make a new extension? [03:26:10] 03(mod) Category listings are not updated when deletion of or edits to a template change the category membership of transcluding pages - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/5382 +comment (10Brad Jorsch) [03:26:24] * lbtc found http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:PreferencesExtension which should do [04:01:34] 03(mod) New Format: Rank - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/22140 +comment (10MWJames) [04:29:33] New review: Catrope; "Looks good except that you shouldn't be writing your own JSON encoder" [mediawiki/extensions/ArticleFeedbackv5] (master); V: 0 C: -1; - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10355 [04:53:03] 03(mod) clicking or editing a missing special property page gives no indication that it's special - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/11768 +comment (10Jan Schoonderbeek) [06:36:39] 03(mod) Call to a member function getAssociation() on a non-object in ...Consumer.php on line 945 - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/36924 +comment (10T. Gries) [06:40:29] New patchset: Logicwiki; "Tamil99 ksh bug" [mediawiki/extensions/Narayam] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10739 [07:12:40] New review: Logicwiki; "http://www.tn.gov.in/gosdb/gorders/it/it_e_29_2010.pdf" [mediawiki/extensions/Narayam] (master) C: 0; - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10739 [07:26:14] 14(DUP) Passive reviewer status in de.wikipedia.org is not applied automatically although conditions are met - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/36357 +comment (10Michael M.) [07:26:14] 03(mod) Autopromotion to autoreview doesn't always work - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/37403 +comment (10Michael M.) [07:27:39] New review: Catrope; "What Kaldari said. If you amend this commit to remove that comment it'll be good to go in." [mediawiki/extensions/LastModified] (master); V: 0 C: -1; - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10734 [08:53:27] New review: John Erling Blad; "New changes seems okey, but some old bugs are reintroduced.ApiSetAliases.php and ApiSetAliasesTest.p..." [mediawiki/extensions/WikidataRepo] (master); V: 0 C: 0; - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10727 [09:29:26] New review: John Erling Blad; "Commented bug found during testing." [mediawiki/extensions/WikidataRepo] (master); V: 0 C: 0; - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10727 [10:10:03] New patchset: Vlakoff; "Remove useless test in getParamValue function of mediawiki.util.js" [mediawiki/core] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10740 [10:12:07] New review: jenkins-bot; "Build Successful " [mediawiki/core] (master); V: 1 C: 0; - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10740 [10:27:14] New patchset: Vlakoff; "Remove useless test in getParamValue function of mediawiki.util.js" [mediawiki/core] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10740 [10:29:15] New review: jenkins-bot; "Build Successful " [mediawiki/core] (master); V: 1 C: 0; - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10740 [11:01:48] 03(mod) HTML tags shouldn't be escaped before passing to MathJax - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/36059 +comment (10nageh) [12:09:38] New review: MaxSem; "(no comment)" [mediawiki/core] (master); V: 1 C: 2; - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10738 [12:09:41] Change merged: MaxSem; [mediawiki/core] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10738 [12:15:22] New review: MaxSem; "(no comment)" [mediawiki/extensions/PageTriage] (master); V: 0 C: 0; - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10737 [12:19:08] 03(mod) Isolate parser from database dependencies - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/25984 +comment (10Platonides) [12:24:15] 03(NEW) [SMW] [ROADMAP] [OPEN] Improve JSON format - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/37418 normal; MediaWiki extensions: Semantic MediaWiki; (jamesin.hongkong.1) [12:25:24] 03(mod) [SMW] [ROADMAP] [OPEN] Improve JSON format - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/37418 +comment (10MWJames) [12:26:12] hi, any body [12:31:51] why support maintenance/removeUnusedAccounts.php doesn't remove unused accounts? [12:31:53] evgen2 finds a bloody body in the floor of the channel [12:32:45] probably due to the log entry about the user creation [12:33:29] hmm, it is bug or feature? [12:37:42] the introduction of the creation log pretty much removed the usefulness of that script [12:37:57] (if it's really that what is preventing it to remove them) [12:38:35] it should probably orphan it [12:40:02] there is a big number of spammers that can create account but have no edits [12:45:25] 03(mod) Deploy extension Memento on Wikipedia sites - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/34778 +comment (10Platonides) [12:48:14] 03(mod) JSON output from #ask does not escape " - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/23946 (10MWJames) [12:48:14] 03(mod) [SMW] [ROADMAP] [OPEN] Improve JSON format - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/37418 (10MWJames) [12:48:52] 03(mod) [SRF] 1.7 #subobject reuse fails on JSON, RDF,RSS, CSV, and BibTex export - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/34783 (10MWJames) [12:48:52] 03(mod) [SMW] [ROADMAP] [OPEN] Improve JSON format - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/37418 (10MWJames) [12:49:53] 03(mod) Quotation mark in page title produces wrong JSON export - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/36438 (10MWJames) [12:49:54] 03(mod) [SMW] [ROADMAP] [OPEN] Improve JSON format - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/37418 (10MWJames) [13:01:52] evgen2: create a bugzilla report and someone will fix it [13:06:21] Betacommand: seems it is created https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34581 [13:20:05] 03(NEW) Rewriting of the index pages configuration - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/37419 enhancement; MediaWiki extensions: ProofreadPage; (thomaspt) [13:21:23] New patchset: Tpt; "Creation of json config file proofreadpage_data_config that replace proofreadpage_index_attributes and proofreadpage_js_attributes. Rewritting of the index form generator." [mediawiki/extensions/ProofreadPage] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10741 [13:22:21] New patchset: Krinkle; "Vector: clean up js/css" [mediawiki/extensions/Vector] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10742 [13:25:10] New review: Krinkle; "(no comment)" [mediawiki/extensions/Vector] (master); V: 1 C: 0; - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10742 [13:25:33] New review: Krinkle; "(no comment)" [mediawiki/extensions/Vector] (master); V: 1 C: 2; - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10742 [13:25:36] Change merged: Krinkle; [mediawiki/extensions/Vector] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10742 [13:26:27] Beau_, hey [13:26:44] I'm noticing something very strange about action=options [13:27:23] When I change timecorrection-other, it gets changed in the DB [13:27:37] But when I look at Special:Preferences, the field is unchanged [13:27:44] The same happens with a lot of other preferences [13:28:46] * [Beau_] idle 243:50:34, signon: Fri May 11 06:07:31 [13:28:47] lol [13:34:45] 03(mod) SemanticMediaWiki: A user-defined property reported as a special one. - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/35761 +comment (10MWJames) [13:36:49] I'll file a bug when I have time [13:42:30] New patchset: Umherirrender; "(bug 33222) Add parentid to revision in export xml" [mediawiki/core] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10743 [13:44:08] 03(mod) add parent_id to export/dump - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/33222 +comment (10Umherirrender) [13:44:30] New review: jenkins-bot; "Build Successful " [mediawiki/core] (master); V: 1 C: 0; - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10743 [14:09:40] New patchset: Krinkle; "Deprecate no longer used Skin::getCommonStylePath." [mediawiki/core] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10744 [14:11:41] New review: jenkins-bot; "Build Successful " [mediawiki/core] (master); V: 1 C: 0; - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10744 [14:14:18] New review: Krinkle; "Looks good other wise :)" [mediawiki/core] (master); V: 0 C: 0; - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/9967 [14:20:09] Hallo. What is the branch that actually runs on the live Wikimedia cluster? wmf/1.20wmf4? [14:20:25] currently, yup [14:20:34] That'll start changing again on monday [14:20:52] So usually, something like [14:20:55] oops [14:21:23] So usually, something like wmf, where is the highest current number, is the current branch? [14:22:01] yes [14:22:01] It's done over a 2 week period, so we have X and X+1 running for most of it [14:22:15] although different WMF wikis may be at different versions [14:22:22] look at Special:Version [14:22:48] https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/MediaWiki_1.20/Roadmap [14:23:11] New patchset: John Erling Blad; "Changed removeLinkSite to removeSiteLink to make it concistent with addSiteLink. Similar changes must also be done in the API, ie. without such changes it will break if this patchset is merged." [mediawiki/extensions/WikibaseLib] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10745 [14:23:43] New patchset: Santhosh; "Allow setting message group state for a group only for specific user right" [mediawiki/extensions/Translate] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10551 [14:29:33] New patchset: Reedy; "jQuery UI 1.8.21" [mediawiki/core] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10746 [14:31:33] New review: jenkins-bot; "Build Successful " [mediawiki/core] (master); V: 1 C: 0; - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10746 [14:42:21] New patchset: John Erling Blad; "Updates to isolalation between API and internal storage" [mediawiki/extensions/WikidataRepo] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10727 [15:02:17] 03(mod) Rewriting of the index pages configuration - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/37419 +comment (10Tpt) [15:08:51] how would I create an external link in an old-style log message? bar used to work, but since 1.19 it doesn't work and wikitext external link syntax doesn't work either... [15:09:57] New review: Krinkle; "(no comment)" [mediawiki/core] (master); V: 1 C: 2; - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10746 [15:09:59] Change merged: Krinkle; [mediawiki/core] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10746 [15:12:01] 03(NEW) Output problematic source information to a wikipage - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/37420 enhancement; Monuments database: Sources; (maarten) [15:12:23] New patchset: John Erling Blad; "Additional entries for Wikibase.settings.php and removing spourious tabs." [mediawiki/extensions/WikidataRepo] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10727 [15:14:59] 03(NEW) 'lat' and 'lon' are sent as strings in JSON output, should probably be numbers - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/37421 normal; Monuments database: API; (maarten) [15:16:25] 03(NEW) Lat/lon should be NULL when empty - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/37422 enhancement; Monuments database: Database; (maarten) [15:16:48] New patchset: Liangent; "Use a new message for subtitle of edit view when creating filter" [mediawiki/extensions/AbuseFilter] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10747 [15:25:20] New patchset: Krinkle; "Qunit tests for custom language rules for various languages." [mediawiki/core] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10096 [15:27:20] New review: jenkins-bot; "Build Successful " [mediawiki/core] (master); V: 1 C: 0; - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10096 [15:27:22] New review: Krinkle; "Marking -1 because I can't get the unit tests to pass." [mediawiki/core] (master); V: 0 C: -1; - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10096 [15:28:11] New review: Krinkle; "I've also rebased it for the current master, it didn't apply cleanly. Also tweaked the logic a bit t..." [mediawiki/core] (master); V: 0 C: -1; - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10096 [15:33:30] New review: John Erling Blad; "The last test that fails, Wikibase\Test\ItemViewTest::testGetHTML is introduced earlier in this patc..." [mediawiki/extensions/WikidataRepo] (master); V: 0 C: 0; - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10727 [15:34:35] 03(mod) Qunit tests cannot be executed for multiple content languages - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/37321 +comment (10Krinkle) [15:40:14] New review: Aaron Schulz; "(no comment)" [mediawiki/core] (master); V: 0 C: 2; - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10683 [15:40:17] Change merged: Aaron Schulz; [mediawiki/core] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10683 [15:42:40] New patchset: John Erling Blad; "Fix for the failing test." [mediawiki/extensions/WikidataRepo] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10727 [15:45:47] 03(FIXED) Edit section links do not display while using diff=curr - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/33671 +comment (10Brad Jorsch) [15:47:54] New patchset: Krinkle; "mw.language: Document ability to set multiple values at once." [mediawiki/core] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10748 [15:49:34] New review: John Erling Blad; "Note that this depends upon 10745 due o a name change from removeLinkSite to removeSiteLink" [mediawiki/extensions/WikidataRepo] (master); V: 0 C: 0; - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10727 [15:50:00] New review: jenkins-bot; "Build Successful " [mediawiki/core] (master); V: 1 C: 0; - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10748 [15:53:10] New patchset: Krinkle; "(bug 35082) addPortletLink incorrectly adds to mutiple
    tags" [mediawiki/core] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10665 [15:55:18] New review: jenkins-bot; "Build Successful " [mediawiki/core] (master); V: 1 C: 0; - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10665 [15:55:33] New review: Krinkle; "Patch set 2: Dixed typo in commit-msg." [mediawiki/core] (master); V: 0 C: 0; - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10665 [16:05:12] New review: Krinkle; "(no comment)" [mediawiki/extensions/CentralAuth] (master); V: 0 C: 0; - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/7274 [16:12:04] New review: Santhosh; "(no comment)" [mediawiki/core] (master) C: 1; - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10748 [16:13:26] 03(mod) EditWarning: Does not appear when search box is used - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/30101 summary (10Krinkle) [16:13:33] New patchset: Krinkle; "(bug 30101) EditWarning: Does not appear when search box is used Patch contributor: Michael M. Tested in FF, Chrome, and IE" [mediawiki/extensions/Vector] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/5734 [16:14:04] New patchset: Krinkle; "(bug 30101) EditWarning: Does not appear when search box is used" [mediawiki/extensions/Vector] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/5734 [16:14:18] New review: Krinkle; "Rebased." [mediawiki/extensions/Vector] (master); V: 1 C: 2; - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/5734 [16:14:21] Change merged: Krinkle; [mediawiki/extensions/Vector] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/5734 [16:36:53] hi chris_mcmahon [16:37:08] hi sumanah [16:37:59] chris_mcmahon: Figured I'd drop in a little early to see if there's anything that still needs doing for the testing event [16:38:13] chris_mcmahon: will you fill in the "to come" bits in https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Article_feedback/Testing_June_2012 or remove them from the table? [16:38:50] New review: John Erling Blad; "Will be replaced by 10728." [mediawiki/extensions/WikibaseLib] (master); V: 0 C: 0; - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10745 [16:40:03] removed [16:40:59] chris_mcmahon: how many signups do you have? [16:41:53] 16 last I heard from Asheesh [16:41:57] paulproteus: chris_mcmahon: is the order of https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/QA/Article_Feedback_Test_Plan correct and most useful to participants? Objective, Platforms/Browsers, Pages, Setup, Procedures, If you find a problem, Technical resources? [16:42:22] I think so [16:42:59] so setup is *fourth*? [16:43:21] hi paulproteus [16:43:54] I'd say setup should be before "pages" .... and "Procedures" might be renamed to something a little more plain-English, like "What to do"? [16:44:08] any objection? [16:44:18] setup is all optional [16:44:35] Morning! [16:45:06] chris_mcmahon: it is? [16:45:08] hm [16:45:16] community testing for Wikipedia Article Feedback starts here in 15 minutes [16:45:28] chris_mcmahon: I'll label it something like "optional extras" then, because "setup" sounds like "gotta do this!" [16:45:28] chris_mcmahon + sumanah: Again, happy to add you as read/write on the doc. 19 signups is what we have now. [16:45:38] sumanah: go ahead [16:47:47] chris_mcmahon: "Note: we are testing the real, live website, so please be respectful".... what would "respectful" mean here? [16:49:07] sumanah: if there's a question about what respectful means, we could address that in the course of the testing [16:49:16] what's your answer right now, though? :) [16:49:48] because I'm actually not sure whether it's ok to, for example, make false criticisms [16:49:55] I just want to warn people that we're dealing with real feedback on real articles, and to have a bit of care as they go about testing [16:50:21] sumanah: the Golden Crowned Sparrow page is for that sort of thing, noted in the TP [16:50:24] chris_mcmahon: right, but what kind of fake behavior is ok? [16:50:39] Howdy savy2020 [16:51:15] chris_mcmahon: ok, so, "inappropriate feedback" -- so, it's ok to make false criticisms? what about cursing, non sequiturs, threats....? [16:51:20] sumanah: pretty much anything that isn't actively harmful to another user is probably OK [16:51:54] sumanah: we have filters for that. you can try it on the Sparrow page and see what happens [16:52:08] ok, so the kind of inappropriate feedback that would be ok to give is, like, non sequiturs, false or nonsensical criticisms of the page content, and requests for help [16:52:34] hi there tparveen! [16:52:43] hey [16:52:43] tparveen: ironing out a few questions right now with chris_mcmahon & paulproteus [16:52:49] hello Sumana [16:52:52] hi Krenair! https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/QA/Article_Feedback_Test_Plan [16:53:36] chris_mcmahon: check out what I was able to do with https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/QA/Article_Feedback_Test_Plan#If_you_find_a_bug [16:53:41] hi tparveen nice to see you [16:53:55] paulproteus: Hello. [16:54:02] Hello Chris [16:54:02] sumanah: Thanks for the link :) [16:54:44] sumanah: Great to have you helping run this show (: [16:54:54] I'll mostly observe, unless you need me to spring into action, in which case I will. [16:56:15] chris_mcmahon: what would you prefer? ^^^ [16:57:29] sumanah: bugzilla is best, but I'll also be a point of contact for information [16:58:04] chris_mcmahon: (the specific thing I wanted you to notice there, which I should have pointed out explicitly: the special link that prefills product, component, and keyword) [16:58:23] Welcome gloo [16:58:36] sumanah: thanks, I didn't know we could do that :) [16:59:17] I agree sumana, the prefill feature is great!!! [17:00:18] hi SeySayux, Thorncrag, shantanoo , pranavrc , klrmn -- ready for the testing event? :) [17:00:58] one more minute and then we'll get started [17:01:59] chris_mcmahon: what would you prefer? ^^^ (re Asheesh observing or helping you lead) [17:02:16] Hello and welcome and thanks for being here, I'm Chris McMahon, Quality Assurance Lead for the Wikimedia Foundation [17:02:40] Today we'll be testing the new Article Feedback system for Wikipedia, Article Feedback Tool version 5, or AFTv5 [17:02:56] This is a two hour session. The first 30 minutes we'll spend on background, questions, discussion. Then we'll be testing for an hour. The last 30 minutes we'll have a debriefing session where we wrap up what we did and what happened in the session. [17:03:19] \o/ yay [17:03:22] Feel free to introduce yourself in the channel and say a little about who you are! [17:03:35] I know paulproteus is here from Openhatch [17:03:44] and sumanah from WMF [17:03:55] and tparveen is an expert tester [17:03:56] I'm Sumana Harihareswara, Engineering Community Manager for the Wikimedia Foundation. I help volunteers find projects and fix problems. [17:04:00] who else is here? [17:04:23] I am Tauhida Parveen, QA contractor testing TimedMedia Handler [17:04:30] An advocate of Exploratory testing [17:04:40] and like to get people excited about testing :) [17:04:45] I'm Asheesh, and someone generally interested in helping open source projects get more contributors. [17:04:46] Hi, I'm Gabriel Loo. I just graduated from university and I'm pursuing a career in software testing. [17:04:52] ("Timed Media Handler" is a feature that's going to make it easier for people to watch long videos on Wikimedia sites!) [17:05:00] gloo: awesome, I think we'll have some good information for you [17:05:15] I'm a random MediaWiki contributor who's just interested in what's going on. [17:05:21] hi Krenair [17:05:29] Glad to see you here, gloo & Krenair [17:05:35] hi [17:05:38] Krenair - good to see you [17:05:52] hi shadowspar [17:06:04] Welcome, shadowspar. We're just doing introductions and optional setup right now. Full-on testing begins at half past. [17:06:07] hi chris_mcmahon! good to see you in IRC. =) [17:06:10] Hey people, I'm Pranav, and I'm just an interested contributor ;) [17:06:31] pranavrc: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Git/Workflow [17:06:36] welcome, pranavrc & shadowspar [17:06:46] hi sumanah [17:06:55] shantanoo: we've also created a good tutorial for Git at https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Git/Tutorial ! and welcome and hi [17:07:03] let me repeat this for the new folks: [17:07:03] hi paulproteus, sumanah =) [17:07:16] This is a two hour session. The first 30 minutes we'll spend on background, questions, discussion. Then we'll be testing for an hour. The last 30 minutes we'll have a debriefing session where we wrap up what we did and what happened in the session. [17:07:35] sumanah: that link has horizontal scrolling? [17:07:46] In a narrow sense, testing is about finding defects and bugs, but in a broader sense, testing is about discovering and providing all sorts of information about the software. So while we are very interested in glitches, display problems, workflow issues, etc., we are also interested in other information you might discover and questions you might have... [17:08:05] I am Mohinder I will be in-out during the 2 hour session [17:08:07] Trying to work out how to use the editor [17:08:09] There are two overarching goals for AFTv5. First is to improve the quality of Wikipedia, article by article, and also the encyclopedia as a whole. But beyond that, we want to encourage everyone who uses Wikipedia to also contribute to it in a meaningful way, so AFTv5 should also subtly, thoughtfully, and politely encourage people to edit Wikipedia as well. [17:08:14] hi Mohinder welcome [17:08:19] sumanah: yes.the chrome_gerrit png file... [17:08:21] I am in [17:08:37] Hello everyone [17:08:41] So let me explain a little bit about Exploratory Testing, which is a disciplined approach to investigating software. [17:08:49] shantanoo: good to know. Can you shrink or crop it down a bit? [17:08:55] The basic idea of ET is that you design your next test based on the results of your previous test. [17:09:00] sumanah: let me try... [17:09:01] chris_mcmahon: (BTW I can take care of repeating the intro for you so you don't lose forward momentum) [17:09:11] So choose an area to investigate from the Procedures or Objectives section of the Test Plan https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/QA/Article_Feedback_Test_Plan [17:09:34] take a few minutes to look over the test plan and ask any questions or make comment [17:09:35] s [17:10:32] take a look at the test pages for Barack Obama, the Golden Crowned Sparrow, Drew Barrymore, and maybe look at the link to other AFTv5 pages [17:10:45] @Chris Safari is out of scope as per test plan [17:11:08] Mohinder: we're interested in Safari as well if you have it handy [17:11:43] as well, any particular versions of firefox? [17:12:04] shadowspar: whatever is on hand is useful information [17:12:10] *nodnod* [17:12:44] if you have Internet Explorer, do use it. I have an IE7 here that I'll be using [17:12:50] sumanah: [[File:Chrome gerrit 9332.png|width=400]] is not working. also tried [[File:Chrome gerrit 9332.png|width=80%]] [17:12:51] Howdy bharath. We're discussing the test plan now. Make sure to load up https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/QA/Article_Feedback_Test_Plan in your web browser, and listen as chris_mcmahon explains further instructions. [17:12:55] By the way, if your IRC connection drops, you can visit the logs of this channel to see what you missed: http://bots.wmflabs.org/~wm-bot/logs/%23mediawiki/20120609.txt [17:13:05] continuing... [17:13:08] Think of ways to demonstrate whether that concept is or is not working. The approaches to do that are called "heuristics", rules of thumb for how software operates, and how it often fails. There is a link to Elisabeth Henderson's "Test Heuristics Cheat Sheet" at the bottom of the Test Plan, which provides some great ideas for test approaches. [17:13:11] Yes -- sumanah's link is excellent. You have to reload it as the page changes [17:13:23] shantanoo: sorry, I don't know enough about wiki syntax to help fix! [17:13:31] sumanah: oh. ok. [17:13:48] As testers we use heuristics, and we use models. As you become familiar with AFTv5 by exploring it, you build a mental model of how it works and how it should work. In the process of testing, we constantly compare our mental model of the system to how the system actually behaves. There are always discrepancies between the tester's mental model and the actual system. These discrepancies can point to real issues: "I reall [17:13:48] thought it should do this, but it doesn't" is important information to report. [17:14:19] Another Exploratory Testing approach is to use "personas". How does Article Feedback appear to a student trying to write a term paper? a grandmother who doesn't know computers very well? a scientist, or an expert in the field? someone who doesn't read English well? [17:14:39] One tester I know always likes to test with personas that are angry, or bitter, or otherwise extremely negative. He finds some interesting issues. :) [17:15:03] So feel free to discuss what you're doing in IRC, ask questions about AFTv5, ET, or anything else that comes up. Your own observations shared here provide heuristics for all the other people participating, and the more information we at Wikipedia can gather from thoughtful testers, the better we can make this software. [17:15:49] sumanah: fixed. made it 800x600. can you have a look and confirm whether its ok? [17:15:55] sure, 1 moment [17:16:34] tparveen: do you have anything to add to my explanation of ET? [17:16:50] Yup, that one's better, shantanoo! go ahead & fix the other images in that page as well, if you have time & inclination? [17:16:53] thanks [17:17:12] You have covered almost everything - I would add the fact that think of yourself as explorers [17:17:17] gloo: since I know you're interested in software testing as a career, I [17:17:25] I'm interested in what you think as well [17:17:29] everytime you find something, even the silliest thing [17:17:30] gloo: I'm curious about your thoughts on Exploratory Testing, in contrast to other perspectives and methodologies you have learnt [17:17:33] New review: Jeroen De Dauw; "John, you killed the original commit message..." [mediawiki/extensions/WikidataRepo] (master); V: 0 C: 0; - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10727 [17:17:38] sumanah: done already :) [17:17:55] even the silliest thing is interesting in the testing world [17:18:01] Mohinder: you said that you are trying to learn how to use the editor? do you mean the editing functionality on Wikipedia, or something else? [17:18:33] great, thanks shantanoo! :-) [17:18:41] hi [17:18:44] hi tejas [17:18:48] hi tejas [17:19:09] is this for wikipedia teesting [17:19:15] it is [17:19:15] tejas: Yes! (: [17:19:21] any indic user other than devanagari around who uses Narayam extension for typing? [17:19:34] https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/QA/Article_Feedback_Test_Plan tejas [17:19:38] shantanoo: yes? [17:19:38] tejas: you can visit the logs of this channel to see what you missed: http://bots.wmflabs.org/~wm-bot/logs/%23mediawiki/20120609.txt [17:20:02] should have all the information you would need. we're spending about another 10 minutes on questions and clarifications of the test plan and testing [17:20:05] I was trying to work out how to post a message her and join the conversation and NOT wikipedia edit [17:20:10] https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/QA/Article_Feedback_Test_Plan [17:20:13] shantanoo: srikanthlogic - sorry to ask, but just to avoid confusing the newbies, can I ask you to move to #wikimedia-dev for the next 90 min if you need to talk about Narayam? [17:20:40] thanks for log [17:20:42] Mohinder: great, glad you figured it out! [17:21:07] I will point out one thing barely mentioned in the Test Plan that I'd like to emphasize, which is so-called "negative testing"....k [17:21:47] very recently we've had reports of the AFTv5 showing up on inappropriate pages, like User pages, or pages not in that list shown as a link in the test plan [17:21:51] shantanoo: come over to #mediawik-i18n [17:21:51] srikanthlogic: other than you :). i was thinking of writing sample code for adding test for other language in ext.narayam.rules.tests.js. i think ml is already being taken care. i was thinking of trying out something like gu, te, etc. [17:22:09] Participants who don't yet have en.wikipedia.org or bugzilla.wikimedia.org accounts, you may find those useful to have, and now is a good time to set them up - easy, takes only a few minutes, free. [17:22:20] chris_mcmahon: I saw AFT on category page and was wondering why its there [17:22:30] we THINK that incidences of AFTv5 on inappropriate pages are declining, but if you find one of those, mention it here [17:22:30] srikanthlogic: what page is that? link? [17:22:45] srikanthlogic: I bet it only appeared once and not again [17:23:08] srikanthlogic: are you sure about the channel name? [17:23:11] and given that bug, any other negative testing you can think up is of interest [17:23:21] Oh, something else I should've mentioned: I do anti-vandalism on enwiki sometimes, so I have rollbacker and therefore a few extra buttons in article feedback [17:23:41] Krenair: Cool! I'd be curious to see, if it's easy for you to post a screenshot, actually. [17:23:46] Krenair: great, you can look into some corners that others cannot [17:23:50] New review: Jeroen De Dauw; "(no comment)" [mediawiki/extensions/WikidataRepo] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10727 [17:24:10] I can feature feedback, hide feedback, and view hidden feedback [17:24:14] sumanah: From what I've been learning so far, Exploratory Testing can be described as non-scripted testing, so it could be easily contrasted with following strict test scripts (automated or manual). [17:24:24] Oh and resolve feedback as well, according to the rights page [17:24:38] sumanah: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Films_about_women_in_India few hours back [17:24:45] chris_mcmahon: it doesn't come now! [17:25:17] srikanthlogic: yes, as far as we know, viewing the page once eliminates the possibility at AFTv5 will ever show again on that page. it's a tricky bug. [17:25:46] five minutes before we start exploring. any more questions or comments? [17:26:04] @chris I may look at the accessibility aspect of the pages as I found in the past is a real issue in some cases. [17:26:07] https://dl.dropbox.com/u/10971457/Wikimedia/Article%20feedback%20with%20rollbacker%20on%20enwiki.png [17:26:20] Mohinder: excellent [17:26:24] paulproteus: ^ [17:26:44] Krenair: Ah, cool! [17:27:07] Krenair: I have some privileged access too, I'll be posting screen shots along the way as well [17:27:45] Mohinder: I look forward to hearing your findings! feel free to add yourself to https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Accessibility and to join the effort to find and fix these kinds of issues in the long term, as well [17:28:07] gloo: ET can be non-scripted, it helps us find bugs that we have not thought about - sometimes when you follow strict test scripts, you get blindsided and don't think of the things that can happen but not on the script. That is where we use ET. Its complementary to automated or manual scripting [17:28:27] sorry, it is mostly non-scripted, can be scripted... [17:28:30] I have a list from our previous WTA session but did not get down to inputting to Bugzilla.I will do in the next couple of days [17:28:58] Mohinder: you already have a bugzilla.wikimedia.org account, right? if you have had any trouble making one, I can help with that [17:29:01] hi Yogesh [17:29:08] Hi [17:29:15] Hi Yogesh! I'm Asheesh that you've been emailing with. [17:29:36] We're just about to begin the testing session, take a look at https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/QA/Article_Feedback_Test_Plan [17:29:43] Oh, and welcome to IRC (: [17:29:45] Mohinder makes an interesting point. Wikipedia can always be tested, and Bugzilla is always open. WMF is experimenting with "test events" like this one, but our long-term goal is to instill a spirit of testing among the Wikipedia community and users [17:29:54] Hi Guys [17:29:57] means [17:30:01] hi Abhinav [17:30:03] Yogesh, you can visit the logs of this channel to see what you missed: http://bots.wmflabs.org/~wm-bot/logs/%23mediawiki/20120609.txt [17:30:06] Hi Abhinav, welcome to IRC! We're just beginning testing now, following this test plan: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/QA/Article_Feedback_Test_Plan [17:30:11] hi Abhinav [17:30:28] * chris_mcmahon cranks up IE7 :) [17:30:29] @thanks chris [17:30:49] "WMF" is the Wikimedia Foundation, the small nonprofit firm that supports Wikipedia & other free culture projects [17:30:55] How to change my nickname ? [17:31:01] You type /nick newnickname [17:31:06] on the Bugzilla note: The other benefit of ET is that it lets us create documentation (test plan, test steps etc) so when you find a bug, please add the reproducible steps to it, we can use those to retest and create test cases from them... [17:31:33] I am going to use Safari - [17:31:38] "reproducible" means that those are the steps someone would take to find the same bug, to "reproduce" the issue [17:31:50] Im unable to set [17:31:53] new nickname [17:32:03] Yo scientes. We're following this test plan: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/QA/Article_Feedback_Test_Plan [17:32:04] Guest52210, abhinav is already reserved for someone else(?), you'll have to use something else [17:32:43] ok, participants! go ahead and use https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/QA/Article_Feedback_Test_Plan to start exploring! [17:33:04] we're here to answer questions, help, etc. for the next 90 minutes at least. [17:33:22] Where it says "To experiment with giving inappropriate feedback" do you mean it's okay to write whatever flame text we want? [17:33:35] Obama page is very interesting packed with link.If you can crack that then it will be a success [17:33:56] paulproteus: you can flame the Sparrow page all you want [17:34:02] Excellent. [17:34:09] paulproteus: we have some filters in place [17:34:23] e.g. POSTING IN ALL CAPS should give a warning about "shouting" [17:34:35] Mohinder: what do you mean by "crack"? [17:34:42] iPad Safari not supported :)( [17:34:50] Thorncrag: what error do you get? [17:35:08] sumanah: Sorry, your browser is not supported by this prototype. To see this page, please use a different browser. [17:35:24] well, that seems bad. Could I ask you to file a bug, Thorncrag? [17:35:33] Thorncrag: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=MediaWiki%20extensions&component=ArticleFeedbackv5&keywords=aftv5-1.5 [17:35:53] Curiously I managed to make the "Post your feedback" button look greyed out... [17:36:00] so I see that in IE7 I get a javascript error. if you're using other browsers and know how to use the analysis tools in them, that's something to keep in mind [17:36:21] these pages might have javascript errors that are fatal for IE7 but not fatal for other browsers [17:36:30] paulproteus: [17:36:36] Yay, I think I found a bug! Anyone want to try to reproduce it with me? [17:36:41] paulproteus: do you need someone to reproduce that? [17:36:42] If someone else can reproduce it, I will file it. [17:36:42] sure [17:36:48] ha, you beat me to it :) [17:36:59] Thorncrag, what browser was that? [17:37:00] Step 1. Be logged-in. Step 2. Go to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden-crowned_Sparrow?aftv5_form=1&aftv5_link=E Step 3. Type something in, and hit Submit [17:37:13] Notice that it says your text is submitted. So far, so good. [17:37:29] Step 4. Reload the page, and scroll to the bottom for the Article Feedback Tool box. [17:37:31] Krenair: Safari on iPad 3 ios 5.1.1 [17:37:37] paulprot1us: "submit" (step 3) = "post your feedback"? [17:37:40] Notice that "Post your feedback" is now pale rather than green [17:37:42] sumanah: Right, thank you for that [17:37:59] Even after you enter text, the button is greyed-out, but clicking it still submits feedback. [17:38:20] paulprot1us: Once I started entering text, the button perked back to bright blue [17:38:23] The bug, I believe, is that it should not look greyed-out when the button does actually work. [17:38:28] k [17:38:33] So either it should truly disable itself, or instead it should keep the normal color. [17:38:33] interesting. paulproteus what if you just do a reload, without typing anything [17:38:33] I get the same thing as Sumana [17:38:42] also, paulprot1us, what's your browser/OS? [17:38:48] let's make the simplest repro we can find [17:38:54] Not for me on Chromium 18.0.1025.168 (Developer Build 134367) Debian wheezy/sid [17:38:59] When I start entering text, the button goes back to bright blue. Chrome 19, Ubuntu 12.04 [17:39:08] * sumanah guesses Iceweasel on Debian [17:39:21] I'm Firefox on Ubuntu [17:39:33] ? [17:39:36] what should that be? [17:39:49] should the "Improve this page" feedback widget in the lower RH corner look the same in all browsers? [17:39:52] scientes: any text you want [17:40:03] oh i gotcha [17:40:16] shadowspar, ooh, I hadn't noticed that before [17:40:21] shadowspar: I think it's OK as long as it doesn't look unreasonable in some way. what's the difference you see? [17:40:28] I have an X in my ancient Firefoxen but not in Safari or Camino [17:40:30] chris_mcmahon: scientes: I've changed that to "For tracking purposes, include "AFT test" somewhere in the data you type into the Article Feedback tool, when appropriate." OK? [17:40:30] on the feedback page, how can i see how many people found a comment helpful? For example, if it shows "100% found it helpful", does that mean 1/1 or 50/50 or 100/100 people found it helpful? [17:40:58] shadowspar: an X where? upper right hand corner of the AFT box? [17:41:01] shadowspar: would you file that in Bugzilla? I think the project should know about that. [17:41:07] chris_mcmahon: will do [17:41:14] holy shit, does mediawiki have automerging of conflicts now? [17:41:16] shadowspar: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=MediaWiki%20extensions&component=ArticleFeedbackv5&keywords=aftv5-1.5 [17:41:18] I'll keep trying to reproduce my issue. [17:41:20] Welcome fabriceflorin! [17:41:22] hi fabriceflorin [17:41:24] 03(NEW) Unable to load/access tool on iPad Safari - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/37423 normal; MediaWiki extensions: ArticleFeedbackv5; (Thorncrag) [17:41:38] If you're here for the QA event, take a look here: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/QA/Article_Feedback_Test_Plan [17:41:38] welcome fabriceflorin, the Project Manager for AFT [17:41:46] fabriceflorin: gloo just asked, "on the feedback page, how can i see how many people found a comment helpful? For example, if it shows "100% found it helpful", does that mean 1/1 or 50/50 or 100/100 people found it helpful?" [17:41:47] Er, right, hi fabriceflorin : P [17:41:53] sumanah: on the small "Improve this page" widget in the lower RH corner, in Firefox the text is followed by a "close this window"-type X mark [17:42:05] fabriceflorin is the premier Subject Matter Expert for AFTv5 [17:42:07] yes, I see that too, shadowspar [17:42:13] Welcome everyone, and thank you so much for helping us test this project! [17:42:22] Aww thanks fabriceflorin (: [17:42:26] ...which brings up a 'remove this tool' bubble when clicked [17:42:43] I don't see that X in Safari, Chrome, or Camino [17:42:50] Hi, i have a question [17:42:55] Sure Yogi3, please ask away! [17:43:03] sumanah: Right now, the total number of people who found something helpful is not available, but we plan to add it as a tooltip next week. [17:43:04] fabriceflorin: and once you're done answering gloo, see whether you have any further questions for Thorncrag re https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37423 which s/he found on iPad [17:43:05] what to i add to the url to bypass my custom skin? [17:43:15] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden-crowned_Sparrow?aftv5_form=1&aftv5_link=E - In this site what do we need to test ? [17:43:16] user:$USER/vector.css [17:43:23] Wikipedia or the webpage ? [17:43:44] Yogi3: try skimming the "how to test" section here: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/QA/Article_Feedback_Test_Plan#How_to_test [17:43:47] I'm too confused! I don't know what I need to test [17:43:52] if I view (what I presume is) version D in Firefox, it looks the same as the others =) [17:43:54] scientes: to bypass it? try ?useskin=monobook [17:43:55] eg aftv5_form=1&aftv5_link=D [17:43:57] Abhi9: try reading https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/QA/Article_Feedback_Test_Plan#How_to_test [17:44:03] scientes, or you can turn it off in your preferences [17:44:05] Hello, paulproteus, shadowspar , Yogi3 , scientes, wikibugs, really nice to meet you! [17:44:13] hi fabriceflorin! =) [17:44:21] wikibugs is a bot, fabriceflorin :P [17:44:36] Hi fabrice... [17:44:37] Abhi9: Here's something to do. Read the "Pages to test" section on there, and enter total mean-spirited junk into the page about sparrows it mentions. [17:44:43] A bot for which we are grateful! and maybe we don't say that enough. :) [17:44:55] As you do that, you'll get a chance to play with the tool, and that long wiki page will more and more sense. [17:45:00] paulprot1us: you're quite right [17:45:10] * sumanah needs to remember technique. [17:45:20] !seen siebrand [17:45:20] There is no such key, you probably want to try: !cache, [17:45:21] what is the purpose of the Details link for each feedback comment other than showing the comment by itself? [17:45:25] Abhi9: (and anyone who wants a review of test approaches) http://dpaste.com/756984/ [17:45:57] eh, that was poorly formed in dpaste, sorry [17:46:02] chris_mcmahon: Thanks so much for preparing the excellent test plan at this URL: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/QA/Article_Feedback_Test_Plan [17:46:10] gloo, when you click it, it shows a lot more info [17:46:21] Howdy xcombelle [17:46:40] risking a flood, but this might be worth it: [17:46:48] Written by a registered user using feedback form M5_1, Posted on 9 June 2012 at 10:13, a link to see the version of the page at the time, length, scores, and activity [17:46:54] So choose an area to investigate from the Procedures or Objectives section of the Test Plan https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/QA/Article_Feedback_Test_Plan [17:46:55] Think of ways to demonstrate whether that concept is or is not working. The approaches to do that are called "heuristics", rules of thumb for how software operates, and how it often fails. There is a link to Elisabeth Henderson's "Test Heuristics Cheat Sheet" at the bottom of the Test Plan, which provides some great ideas for test approaches. [17:46:55] As testers we use heuristics, and we use models. As you become familiar with AFTv5 by exploring it, you build a mental model of how it works and how it should work. In the process of testing, we constantly compare our mental model of the system to how the system actually behaves. There are always discrepancies between the tester's mental model and the actual system. These discrepancies can point to real issues: "I reall [17:46:55] thought it should do this, but it doesn't" is important information to report. [17:46:55] Another Exploratory Testing approach is to use "personas". How does Article Feedback appear to a student trying to write a term paper? a grandmother who doesn't know computers very well? a scientist, or an expert in the field? someone who doesn't read English well? [17:47:21] gloo, do you see that? [17:47:21] I would like to make a minor correction, though: we do not support IE7 at this time, you shouldn't be able to see the tool at all on that platform. And IE8 already has a lot of known bugs, so I am not sure how useful it is for them to test it, because they will basically report the same stuff we already know. So I recommend holding off on testing IE7 and IE8 at this time. [17:47:28] Abhi9, Yogi3: Do you know what you're doing now, or do you want some more guidance? [17:47:37] @Krenair, what extra info exactly? [17:47:47] I don't see any feedback link/widget on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden-crowned_Sparrow?aftv5_form=1&aftv5_link=E [17:47:47] {{PLURAL:0|0 flag|0 flags}} --> is this bug already reported ? plural forms in js showing as code [17:47:49] i see the same thing when i click Details here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:ArticleFeedbackv5/Golden-crowned_Sparrow?aftv5_form=1 [17:47:58] Written by a registered user using feedback form x, Posted on d m y at h:s, a link to see the version of the page at the time, length, scores, and activity [17:48:01] that info [17:48:11] fabriceflorin: go ahead and edit the test plan to remove those, then, please [17:48:42] gloo, so you are seeing extra info when you click details? [17:49:01] scientes: I do see it at the bottom of the page. What operating system & browser are you using? and are you logged into Wikipedia? [17:49:28] firefox nightly w/ https everywhere [17:49:43] ad logged in [17:50:04] scientes: In the Firebug net tab, do you see a 404 or something obvious causing the failure? [17:50:10] @Krenair, i don't see those extra pieces of info... that's strange [17:50:16] Ah. [17:50:25] one other thing I noticed, the widget & much of the functionality of the feedback page is javascript-dependent [17:50:29] On my non-privileged account I don't see it either. [17:50:32] so if you're using noscript or some such, it won't appear [17:50:37] actually, fabriceflorin I can still see the tool in IE7, and it's still throwing a js error. this is doing the "negative testing" I mentioned earlier [17:50:45] So, the detail link is useless to those who can't see the extra info [17:50:46] Yay, I can reproduce the bug I found. Also yo Thorncrag [17:50:54] scientes: please do file that? that's odd! [17:51:08] Krenair: excellent, can you file that one in Bugzilla? [17:51:12] scientes: Krenair - https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=MediaWiki%20extensions&component=ArticleFeedbackv5&keywords=aftv5-1.5 [17:51:18] @Krenair, what is a privileged account? i guess i don't have one... it would also be useless for people not logged in then? [17:51:38] can anyone help with NewUserMessage extension? [17:51:44] \o/ paulproteus [17:51:59] Going to write up reproduction instructions for a sanity-check for y'all and then if someone else can reproduce it, will file bug. [17:52:03] I do anti-vandalism work on the english wikipedia, I have an extra flag on my account which gives me some more buttons in Articlefeedback [17:52:10] Welcome izhak! Are you here for the Wikipedia QA event? drat. [17:52:14] Ah well. (-: [17:52:15] Testing going on.... [17:52:20] Cool [17:52:21] Abhi9: Sweet [17:52:23] But what it also seems to do is let me see extra info here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:ArticleFeedbackv5/Golden-crowned_Sparrow/130327 [17:52:56] note that there are some complicated privileges set up for AFTv5, so if you end up seeing something useless, that could mean a problem with the privileges [17:53:02] chris_mcmahon, you have a similar thing, can you confirm this? [17:53:45] * paulproteus waves to balrog [17:53:56] Krenair: what was that link? [17:54:09] ah, got it [17:54:15] sumanah: Thanks! I just updated the test plan with platforms we now support, at this URL: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/QA/Article_Feedback_Test_Plan#Platforms.2FBrowsers_of_Interest [17:54:27] chris_mcmahon: is there a limit on the size of feedback? I typed in the whole test plan and it took it... [17:54:50] To reproduce: http://dpaste.com/756987/ [17:55:11] chris_mcmahon, all users see a link to that page from [[w:Special:Articlefeedbackv5/Golden-crowned Sparrow]], but they can't necessarily get any extra details from it [17:56:17] how do i get the include script to use debug=true ? [17:56:26] tparveen: yes, we've accepted the whole Test Plan as a comment. fabriceflorin we should consider limiting the input size, that could get really ugly [17:56:38] If anyone wants to try a noncontroversial page that is *not* "Golden-Crowned Sparrow", https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smithfield,_London .... just remember to include the phrase "AFT test" in your feedback! [17:56:48] cause wikimedia sticks all the scripts together so 404s would never happen paulprot1us [17:56:50] tparveen: would you enter that in Bugzilla, possibly as 'enhancement'? [17:57:02] scientes: Smart cookies, those Wikimedians. [17:57:04] can anyone else reproduce this? Flag some comments as abuse, then refresh the page, do you see some text in angle brackets where "Flagged as abuse" text used to be? [17:57:05] yes... [17:57:08] Can someone try to reproduce my bug? http://dpaste.com/756987/ [17:57:16] 03(NEW) Plural Javascript coming as code. - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/37424 normal; MediaWiki extensions: ArticleFeedbackv5; (srik.lak) [17:57:35] Paulproteus:I am looking at it...one sec [17:57:40] tparveen: Sweet, thanks! [17:57:40] chris_mcmahon: Good point about different privileges for AFT. To sum things up, you are either a reader or an editor for the purposes of this test. If you have done over 10 edits on Wikipedia in the past 4 days, you should have gained the status of 'auto-confirmed editor', which makes you an editor and gives you more privileges. Otherwise, you are a reader. [17:57:45] gloo: I can try that! give me a moment. [17:57:52] gloo: you're logged into Wikipedia, right? [17:57:56] Here is the 'reader' FAQ: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Article_Feedback/Help [17:57:57] @sumanah, i see after refreshing the page [17:58:11] @sumanah, no, i'm testing while logged out [17:58:13] And here is the 'editor' FAQ: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Article_Feedback/Help/Editors [17:58:14] gloo, and are you "autoconfirmed"? that is, you had made 10 edits and your account is at least 5 days old? [17:58:16] ohhhh [17:58:25] gloo, ok, let me try in a logged-out browser, just a moment [17:58:28] After I flag something as abuse, I see '{{PLURAL:2|2 flag|2 flags}}' next to the flag as abuse button [17:58:38] 30 minutes left in the testing exercise, then we do a debriefing session [17:58:40] but how to i get the script to load with debug=true, instead of debug=false so i get all the comments ad long variable names? [17:58:42] Krenair: that MUST be a bug, file it? [17:58:50] because it still doesn't work for me [17:58:57] scientes: I don't know.... maybe Firebug knows :/ [17:59:00] and i turned off all my custom stuff, only standard preference stuff [17:59:03] sumanah, im using that [17:59:20] but its hard to debug the minified version, even though i can download the big version [17:59:22] !b 37424 | sumanah [17:59:22] sumanah : https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37424 [17:59:28] testing the documentation is also part of this exercise, so if anyone wants to do a critical reading of the links fabriceflorin just posted, that would be welcome! [17:59:58] oh, ok Krenair [18:00:01] gloo, looking now [18:00:02] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Article_Feedback/Help http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Article_Feedback/Help/Editors [18:00:22] 03(mod) Plural Javascript coming as code. - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/37424 +comment (10Krenair) [18:00:54] Basically, the main difference is that auto-confirmed editors will see special tools on the right side of the feedback page ('Feature this page, Mark as resolved, View activity), which readers cannot see. You can see what these differences look like on this feature requirements page: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Article_feedback/Version_5/Feature_Requirements#Feedback_Page_for_Readers (screenshot for readers is shown [18:00:55] first, then editors screenshot. The graphics have changed a bit since we took these screenshots, but not much.) [18:01:14] :) [18:01:26] gloo, I'm trying in Epiphany on Ubuntu and I cannot repro what you saw: "Flag some comments as abuse, then refresh the page, do you see some text in angle brackets where "Flagged as abuse" text used to be?" [18:01:35] as far as i can tell onl the startup script is getting loaded [18:01:40] and not the extension proper [18:01:51] I can't reproduce that either, gloo [18:02:29] @sumanah, Krenair, hmmm ok i'm using firefox on windows 7 starter... i'll try to investigate some more [18:02:36] Even if you are not yet an editor, don't fret. Over 98% of our feedback users are readers, so it helps us immensely to have you test the reader view, which is most important to get right. [18:03:10] For my next trick, I'll go IPv6... [18:03:14] gloo: that could be a Windows issue, if you can reproduce that reliably on your platform, please go ahead and enter the issue in Bugzilla [18:03:23] gloo: I say, file that in bugzilla.wikimedia.org please, with screenshot [18:03:30] it doesn't seem like this checks for that url parameter we are passing https://bits.wikimedia.org/static-1.20wmf4/extensions/ArticleFeedback/modules/ext.articleFeedback/ext.articleFeedback.startup.js [18:03:36] @chris_mcmahon, will do. I'm checking on other browsers atm [18:03:38] gloo - https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=MediaWiki%20extensions&component=ArticleFeedbackv5&keywords=aftv5-1.5 [18:03:43] gloo: and make sure to specify browser, OS, and add a screen shot if possible [18:04:41] wait it shows up in chromium even without that flag [18:04:45] just a diffen't page of it [18:04:56] we really need more scrutiny from Windows/IE users, that is on my radar as QA Lead [18:05:07] so thanks gloo :) [18:05:10] and if i log out it shows up [18:05:12] I also want to remind folks that right now, AFT5 is only deployed on 0.6% of the English Encyclopedia, so if you are looking for new articles to test, go to this page, which lists articles that have AFT5 on it: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Article_Feedback_5_Additional_Articles [18:05:14] well i ran into a dead end so.. :) [18:05:24] I have some unused RAM at the moment. I could fire up Windows 8 to see how it works in IE10 [18:05:30] Until the new AFT5 version is released, an older version of the feedback tool (AFT4) is shown on most other Wikipedia articles, inviting people to rate the quality of articles -- without comments [18:05:35] Lcawte: wanna help us test on Windows? [18:05:39] so my prefs are breaking the feedback tool [18:05:50] Hi Tpt -- are you here for the QA event? if so, I'll help you get started. [18:05:51] Thorncrag: if you get a dead end, you might want to look at the Heuristics Cheat Sheet for new ideas, link is in the Test Plan [18:05:52] Test what on Windows? [18:05:57] Article Feedback [18:06:02] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/2001:0:53aa:64c:883:2cbe:b4db:4c -- I'm sad my https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:ArticleFeedbackv5/Drew_Barrymore/132030&ref=cta doesn't show up in Contributions [18:06:03] Lcawte: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/QA/Article_Feedback_Test_Plan [18:06:03] scientes: Can you clarify what types of prefs are breaking the tool? [18:06:13] paulproteus: I have tried your bug...I think the "post your feedback" button is supposed to be grayed out until it receives a text - when I type text, it is no longer grayed out... [18:06:34] 03(mod) OH-AFT - Pluralization Javascript displaying as code - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/37424 summary (10Sumana Harihareswara) [18:06:40] Interesting. For me, even after I type, it stays greyed-out, given the switch from non-logged-in to logged-in. I can try to diagnose deeper. [18:06:42] fabriceflorin, well it breaks when logged in, even with a non-standard skin [18:07:02] paulproteus:ok..I am using Safari - what are you using? [18:07:03] and i remove all my custom.css stuff [18:07:05] paulproteus: Your point is well taken, we are looking for a way to add feedback to My Contribs. We may initially have to give you a special page called MyFeedback, because MyContribs is going to be hairy for us to implement in this timeline. [18:07:05] paulproteus: could you file that issue with Contributions as an enhancement. the fact that it made you sad is actually important [18:07:08] Firefox and Chromium [18:07:31] chris_mcmahon + fabriceflorin: Cool, will put that on the queue [18:07:48] hmmm...let me check it with Firefox...in Safari, as soon as I type a text, it is bright blue color [18:07:59] 03(mod) OH-AFT - Unable to load/access tool on iPad Safari - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/37423 summary (10Sumana Harihareswara) [18:08:52] ohhh me & yogesh has found one gud bug [18:08:57] :) cheers from our side [18:09:01] Nice Abhi9! What's that? [18:10:14] display of long text in Targeted URL description [18:10:19] fabriceflorin, i sure wish there was a tool for bisect this type of stuff [18:10:45] tparveen: if you do any more destructive exploring like posting the whole test plan, could you do it on the Sparrow page? not a big deal, but it looks funny on the Drew Barrymore page :) [18:10:48] aha reproduced it on new profile, 1 sec [18:11:10] aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa [18:11:20] Hi guys, as I said earlier, we do not support any mobile platforms, including iPad. We only support the platforms on this updated test plan: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/QA/Article_Feedback_Test_Plan#Platforms.2FBrowsers_of_Interest [18:11:22] sorry for sapm !! [18:11:37] lol Abhi9 (: [18:11:40] 03(NEW) OH-AFT Relevance ordering showing an irrelevant comment first - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/37425 normal; MediaWiki extensions: ArticleFeedbackv5; (sumanah) [18:12:12] sumanah: good one, testing those filters. that's another complicated area. [18:12:17] tparveen: or https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:ArticleFeedbackv5/Algebra [18:12:27] * andre__ sneaks in but is too busy with finishing other stuff :-( [18:12:38] hi andre__ [18:12:42] heja [18:13:13] member:chris_mcmahon: sorry, I think I did a similar one in sparrow - I did put AFT test so hopefully we will be able to clean up easily - I will target all my explosion towards sparrow [18:13:16] Not all the feedback is taken in and the one displayed is cut off when the word length goes over certain limit [18:13:26] tparveen: not a problem! [18:13:28] Not all feedback appears in the list when Newest first option is selected [18:14:20] chris_mcmahon: Thanks for reminding folks to only do destructive testing on the Golden-crowned sparrow page -- not on other encyclopedia pages. This is a live site, with real people providing feedback, and if you put destructive feedback on that live site, it's almost like adding graffiti to a cathedral. So please act responsibly on pages other the Golden-crowned sparrow page: [18:14:20] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:ArticleFeedbackv5/Golden-crowned_Sparrow [18:14:26] Mohinder: say more about not all the feedback appearing? [18:14:32] 03(NEW) "Improve this page" feedback widget shows "Remove this tool?" X only in Firefox - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/37426 normal; MediaWiki extensions: ArticleFeedbackv5; (wikimedia-bz) [18:15:08] 03(mod) "Improve this page" feedback widget shows "Remove this tool?" X only in Firefox - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/37426 +comment (10Rick Scott ("shadowspar")) [18:15:23] 15 minutes left for testing before we do the debriefing [18:15:43] I think there should be a text limit on Text to display field in 'Insert Link' dialog ? [18:15:50] if you're feeling stuck, check out the Heuristics Cheat Sheet or post a question or comment in the channel [18:15:55] I guess I should get on filing my bugs. [18:16:16] Pop for Improve this page stopped working with IE8.Refreshing the page does bot bring the pop up anymore [18:16:26] Yogi3: please do file that! and you can mark it as an "enhancement" [18:16:36] Mohinder: good! please file that one [18:16:38] Yogi3: bugzilla is also where we give suggestions for improvement [18:16:45] Yogi3: Mohinder - https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=MediaWiki%20extensions&component=ArticleFeedbackv5&keywords=aftv5-1.5 [18:17:14] lol "[check] Don't show the Article feedback widget on pages" [18:17:15] :) Cool [18:17:27] that was it [18:17:34] :) Okay [18:17:41] :) [18:17:54] scientes: Was it disabled by default, or ...? [18:17:57] paulproteus: I could not reproduce your bug - that does not mean its not there - it just means that I could not reproduce on Mac 10.6, Safari 5.17 and Firefox 12 [18:18:03] Maybe you (X)'d it out in the past. [18:18:11] paulproteus, yes it is disabled by default, but i Xed it in the past [18:18:19] cause i didn't find the widget very helpful [18:18:38] Also, I recommend that you use this link to test the the final feedback form (Option 6), which we are considering using for the wider deployment: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden-crowned_Sparrow?aftv5_form=6 [18:18:38] * paulproteus nods [18:19:08] * chris_mcmahon checks out Fabrice's link [18:19:22] You basically add ''?aftv5_form=6' at the end of the URL for any AFT5 article. [18:20:02] The other contender for the final release version is Option 1: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden-crowned_Sparrow?aftv5_form=1 [18:20:54] can i add multiple attachments on bugzilla? [18:21:00] yes [18:21:09] It has been years since I've used Wikimedia Bugzilla... let's see. [18:21:10] gloo, yeah, but not in one step [18:21:40] paulproteus: yeah, WMF Bugzilla is a bit over-engineered. we'll be making some improvements to that soon. [18:21:47] 03(NEW) OH-AFT - Filtering by "helpfulness", ranking mistake - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/37427 normal; MediaWiki extensions: ArticleFeedbackv5; (sumanah) [18:22:16] We would be grateful for your recommendations of whether we should release Option 6 or Option 1 of the feedback form. You can read about the differences between these two options here: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Article_feedback/Version_5/Feature_Requirements#Final_Feedback_Form_.28Option_6.29 [18:22:38] 03(mod) OH-AFT - Filtering by "helpfulness", ranking mistake - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/37427 +comment (10Sumana Harihareswara) [18:22:40] has anyone read through the Help docs? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Article_Feedback/Help http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Article_Feedback/Help/Editors I'm interested in opinions on those [18:22:54] chris_mcmahon: Your comment about Option 6 being too busy is duly noted, and I agree with you. We're going to try to remove some of this clutter next week. [18:22:56] 03(NEW) "Flagged as abuse" text displays incorrectly upon page refresh - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/37428 normal; MediaWiki extensions: ArticleFeedbackv5; (gabriel.loo) [18:23:06] Mohinder: you're filing those bugs you found, right? :) [18:23:47] about five minutes left, start wrapping up your testing and report anything you haven't reported please [18:24:01] Mohinder: Thanks for your good feedback! Look forward to seeing your bugs, so we can track down the cause of the problem. [18:24:04] 03(mod) OH-AFT "Flagged as abuse" text displays incorrectly upon page refresh - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/37428 +aftv5-1.5; summary (10Sumana Harihareswara) [18:24:10] and then we'll debrief the testing session [18:24:39] 03(mod) OH-AFT "Flagged as abuse" text displays incorrectly upon page refresh - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/37428 (10Gabriel Loo) [18:25:01] Wow, https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=MediaWiki%20extensions&component=ArticleFeedbackv5&keywords=aftv5-1.5 is super clean! [18:25:11] scientes: Yogi3 Mohinder Abhi9 shadowspar Thorncrag shantanoo -- waiting for any help or answers? [18:25:16] 03(mod) OH-AFT "Flagged as abuse" text displays incorrectly upon page refresh - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/37428 +comment (10Gabriel Loo) [18:25:42] https://bugzilla. has so many bugs !! lol [18:25:49] 03(NEW) There Should be a text limit on 'Text to display' field in 'Insert Link' dialog - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/37430 major; MediaWiki: Page editing; (sharma.yogesh) [18:25:49] Abhi9: Welcome to open source (: [18:25:59] paulproteus: what do you mean by clean? curious [18:26:16] chris_mcmahon, I read through https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Article_Feedback/Help/Monitors [18:26:22] how can i turn on 3rd party cookies only for wikimedia sites? [18:26:25] Visually, it seems to just show relevant things, and there's enough whitespace to not feel overwhelmed. [18:26:46] 03(mod) There Should be a text limit on 'Text to display' field in 'Insert Link' dialog - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/37430 (10Yogesh) [18:27:43] or only originating from site X [18:27:43] 03(mod) There Should be a text limit on 'Text to display' field in 'Insert Link' dialog - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/37430 (10Yogesh) [18:28:01] Abhi9: Wikipedia, and MediaWiki to run it, have been around for about a decade, and we want to improve as much as we can. So we try to collect all reports of problems. But yeah, there will always be lots of problems left to fix, lots of opportunities to improve [18:28:37] 03(NEW) OH-AFT "Submit your feedback" partly greyed out in ArticleFeedbackv5 - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/37431 normal; MediaWiki extensions: ArticleFeedbackv5; (asheesh) [18:28:42] :) [18:29:03] Wow, it is really amazing how clean the UI for MediaWiki bugzilla is. [18:29:07] #Where is 37429 ?? [18:29:15] 03(mod) OH-AFT - There Should be a text limit on 'Text to display' field in 'Insert Link' dialog - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/37430 +aftv5-1.5; summary (10Sumana Harihareswara) [18:29:15] WOW, Logged first bug :) :) [18:29:20] !b 37429 | Abhi9 [18:29:20] Abhi9 : https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37429 [18:29:25] congrats Yogi3! [18:29:25] 03(mod) There Should be a text limit on 'Text to display' field in 'Insert Link' dialog - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/37430 -aftv5-1.5 ; summary (10Krinkle) [18:29:25] yay Yogi3 we appreciate it! [18:29:42] paulproteus: paulprot1us: aha, that's what you meant [18:30:20] 03(mod) OH-AFT "Submit your feedback" partly greyed out in ArticleFeedbackv5 - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/37431 +comment (10Asheesh Laroia) [18:30:21] Hey Guys, Have you seen @37429 ?? [18:30:48] OK, lets start the debriefing session. I'm going to do this in a classic "retrospective" way, first I want to discuss what went well on this test event [18:31:04] 03(NEW) OH-AFT: text limit needed for link alt text - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/37429 critical; MediaWiki: JavaScript; (a.sejpal) [18:31:16] for about 10 minutes, mention things that made you happy about the last 1.5 hours [18:31:21] Folks, I want to let you know that I have hidden all comments that included large amounts of gibberish or entire test pages on articles, so we don't confuse our users with these testing types of comments. So it is possible you may not find these comments where you left them. If that's an issue for reporting purposes, let me know, and I can fish out the relevant posts for you. [18:31:32] I found what seems to be a real, though maybe tough-to-reproduce, issue! [18:31:43] Hehe, iPads are not Macintosh :o) [18:31:45] 03(mod) OH-AFT - There Should be a text limit on 'Text to display' field in 'Insert Link' dialog - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/37430 summary (10Sumana Harihareswara) [18:31:48] I think a lot of people found real issues [18:31:54] More than zero people signed up! Also people totally new to IRC came, which thrilled me. [18:31:57] paulproteus: I'm all ears. [18:32:01] Krinkle: we're trying to prepend OH-AFT to all the bug summaries of bugs found tonight [18:32:07] fabriceflorin: Oh, well, it's https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/37431 [18:32:08] today, I mean [18:32:14] this is great, useful feedback [18:32:14] sumanah: Sorry I spelled your name wrong! [18:32:22] sumanah: I didn't remove that, it was a conflict. bugzilla's edit conflict resolution is not obvious [18:32:36] I moved it to WikiEditor because its not AFT related [18:32:37] for my part, I'm pleased that the Test Plan seems to have been useful for people [18:32:37] Krinkle: aha! ok, no offense inferred :) [18:32:42] chris_mcmahon was energetic and enthusiastic (or at least appeared that way), which was great. [18:32:47] Thorncrag, appreciate it [18:32:56] I didn't notice much confusion, everyone pitched right in, doing useful things [18:33:03] sumanah: Want to re-add it still regardless? [18:33:11] Krinkle: why don't you go ahead :) [18:33:14] paulproteus: Thanks! Nice bug. [18:33:18] k [18:33:19] * sumanah cleans up some other bug stuff [18:33:23] things went by pretty quick, i didn't know an hour had already passed [18:33:29] what else went well? [18:33:33] Yeah, once I started actually testing things, the time flew by. [18:33:35] 03(mod) OH-AFT: text limit needed for link alt text - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/37429 04CRIT->minor (10Krinkle) [18:34:06] It was great having other "old hands" who are in this channel help out, as well as fabriceflorin the project lead. [18:34:09] I was happy to get some information about Exploratory Testing to people who may never have heard of it. [18:34:18] folks were quick to respond to my questions, that made the experience very smooth. thanks! [18:34:31] Oh, and MW Bugzilla looks amazingly great. That made me very happy. [18:34:32] scientes: Yogi3 Mohinder Abhi9 shadowspar Thorncrag shantanoo -- what did you like about this experience? [18:34:34] I hope that is useful for gloo and others who want to adopt a testing mindset [18:34:35] I was going to say, having lots of activity in here & people to bounce things off of was great =) [18:34:35] Hey guys, thank you so much for all your invaluable help. It felt like a barn raising -- you covered a lot of ground in just an hour and I really look forward to reading all your reports. THANK YOU! [18:35:15] 8 bugs filed: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&list_id=121909&short_desc=oh-aft&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&resolution=---&resolution=LATER&resolution=DUPLICATE [18:35:33] If you are interested, we would love to invite you back in a month or so, to take a look at the improved version we will be developing based on all your good feedback. [18:35:43] thanks sumanah, thanks testers, repro'ers, and chatterers :) [18:35:47] 03(mod) OH-AFT "Submit your feedback" partly greyed out in ArticleFeedbackv5 - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/37431 +aftv5-1.5 (10Sumana Harihareswara) [18:36:24] did anyone feel moved to actually edit Wikipedia? that is a subtle but important point we're trying to get across [18:36:26] And a special round of applause for chris_mcmahon and sumanah, our ringleaders on the Wikimedia front! [18:36:32] * sumanah curtsies [18:36:56] 03(mod) OH-AFT: text limit needed for link alt text - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/37429 +comment (10Abhinav) [18:36:57] chris_mcmahon: on the one hand, the feedback page seems like a nice hint to potential editors on what they might want to add [18:37:03] Also, did anyone feel like they gained new insight into how an open source project works? That's a subtle but important point I'm trying to get across (: [18:37:10] on the other hand, people may be inclined to leave feedback *instead* of editing the page =/ [18:37:25] (which is a contribution, at least) [18:37:35] paulproteus has a good point, teaming up with Openhatch.org for this was great [18:37:42] sumanah: *nodnod* it definitely is. [18:37:49] (aww, thanks) [18:37:55] It's really great :) :) [18:37:57] tparveen: take a look at https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&list_id=121909&short_desc=oh-aft&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&resolution=---&resolution=LATER&resolution=DUPLICATE and see whether any of those bugs need more metadata? keywords, etc [18:37:58] 03(mod) Article Feedback - My Contributions - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/36773 +comment (10Asheesh Laroia) [18:38:02] it's really awseome :) [18:38:08] Abhi9: Yogi3: you're always welcome here in #mediawiki [18:38:18] Yogi3 Abhi9 anything in particular that you liked? [18:38:54] Yeah -- this place is where much of the regular software development discussion that drives MediaWiki takes place. [18:38:56] I'm the Engineering Community Manager for the Wikimedia Foundation, and we thoroughly encourage new folks to come in, poke around, learn, and contribute [18:39:04] A Big platform with different testers in surrounding with different types of testing, Great ! [18:39:04] What she said (: [18:39:05] we want participate in each & every event. It's really big platform for us [18:39:08] :) [18:39:11] also, does everyone feel excited about testing both positive and negative way - that is what I am trying to get across...I hear "time flew by" - makes me happpy [18:39:30] shadowspar: You make some excellent points, we are trying to adjust the settings so that new users will want to try to edit -- and so that editors can get the feedback they need from users who are not comfortable editing. [18:39:41] sumanah, well, i had it turned off b/f cause i didn't like it. and well, I still don't really like it---but i do think people should be somehow notified that they can change wikipedia [18:39:43] The JS that generated "Possible duplicates" in https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=MediaWiki%20extensions&component=ArticleFeedbackv5&keywords=aftv5-1.5 successfully prevented me from filing a dup. That was awesome. [18:39:50] Abhi9: Yogi3 - you can subscribe to @MediaWikiMeet on Twitter or Identi.ca to know about other future events that are targeted at our technical community [18:39:55] and maybe interactivity gets people more involved, idk [18:40:03] okay, we've done 10 minutes on what went well, let's do another 10 minutes on what did NOT go well [18:40:08] sure !!! [18:40:10] scientes: our researchers do say that it gets more people to edit [18:40:20] I didn't really do any testing because I couldn't get it loaded on my iPad and that's all I have in reach :S [18:40:26] Our latest research suggests that there is no cannibalization between feedback and editing -- in fact, posting feedback encourages a substantial number of new users to productively edit articles on Wikipedia, which we hope can help reverse the recent decline in both new and existing editors. [18:40:27] scientes: fabriceflorin works with our "editor engagement" team [18:40:32] sure [18:40:42] !events [18:40:43] We run face-to-face events for MediaWiki developers and people who want to learn: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/MediaWiki_developer_meetings We also have online meetings in IRC to triage bugs: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Bug_management/Triage [18:40:47] fabriceflorin, sumanah: cool, that's exactly what I was curious to know =) [18:40:51] Thorncrag: yes, we could have discussed non-browser access in a better way [18:40:56] Howdy pepribal [18:41:12] Based on our analysis, we now project over 2 million feedback posts per month on the English Encyclopedia when the tool is widely deployed later this year (on par with the current rate of about 2 million edits per month). And it appears that article feedback is emerging as a promising new form of contribution for new users. [18:41:35] i found it pretty hard to follow the chats here, so i couldn't really pay attention to what others were doing [18:41:35] did anyone get frustrated at any point? I know paulproteus got sad once. [18:41:39] an hour really did fly by. next time I might be inclined to spend the hour doing nothing but testing, then fleshing out bug reports for a while afterwards [18:42:02] gloo: yes, fast and copious IRC chat can be hard to follow, even for veterans [18:42:04] gloo: yes, Weekend Testing runs their chat in skype, it might be slightly easier to follow than on IRC [18:42:09] I also found it quite hard to follow IRC [18:42:26] So this is why all your great work today is so important to the future of Wikipedia, which is suffering from a serious editor decline. If we can improve our article feedback tool to engage more participation from our readers, we may be able to convert them into editors over time, and at least give them a way to contribute productively.\ [18:42:38] and we did not even have all that many people participate [18:42:41] Yeah, it'd be interesting to have some other format, perhaps an Etherpad where Chris writes about important topics like Exploratory Testing, and IRC discussion for the rest of us. [18:42:41] as you see, gloo, when I want to talk to someone specifically, I use their name in the channel so that they get the signal to notice.... helps when things are busy [18:42:49] fabriceflorin++ [18:42:51] some IRC tools can make it much easier to sift fast conversation for the bits you're interested in, but there's a learning curve there [18:42:52] I thought it was a pretty good number, but IRC was very busy. [18:43:03] i also took a while getting used to using bugzilla, but that probably just takes time to get used to [18:43:06] IT DOES [18:43:07] you could just encourage participants to /msg each other if it's not useful for the whole discussion [18:43:19] @sumanah, yes i picked up on that. very helpful :) [18:43:26] I really appreciate that you guys had to learn to use IRC and [18:43:27] !tabcompletion | gloo [18:43:27] gloo : Instead of manually typing another person's nickname in IRC, you can type the beginning of their name and hit TAB on your keyboard to get it autocompleted, like on the command line. This avoids misspellings. Just make sure it's the right person! [18:43:27] hi, paulproteus [18:43:31] Another thing I was thinking was we could have smaller break-out groups, like 4-5 IRC channels with max 4 people in them [18:43:41] .. and Bugzilla, which aren't the friendliest of tools. [18:43:44] gloo: I'm not so fond of bugzilla myself, we use it for EVERYTHING and it gets a lot of noise [18:43:49] The thing is, I like the big community feel, and I'm not thrilled about losing that. [18:43:53] gloo: I use tab-completion ALL THE TIME, it saves a lot of time, but it takes a little while to get into my muscle memory [18:43:54] wm-bot, wow! thanks for the tip... very helpful [18:44:03] That's a bot, gloo... [18:44:12] Sumana made it sent you that [18:44:12] lol see i have a lot to get used to [18:44:16] (another thing to get used to!) [18:44:18] yeah :) [18:44:31] * shadowspar has been known to have extended conversations with bots ^_^; [18:44:33] It's okay, even fabriceflorin did that earlier :P [18:44:38] it's like you've entered a friendly version of the cantina from Star Wars -- lots of aliens to meet [18:44:39] making the barriers to entry as low as possible is an important point [18:44:47] chris_mcmahon: I agree [18:44:59] otoh, these are the tools that we use [18:45:09] however i have always loved wikipedia [18:45:20] at least they're all web-based and we don't make people download things -- they can use the web gateway to IRC [18:45:27] Yeah. [18:45:29] Hi all... I have a question: I've just installed a mediawiki, and I want to change $wgServer but I can't find LocalSettings.php... How can I do it? [18:45:29] and the in-place graphical editor is really a huge gain [18:45:33] I should maybe have said more in the test plan about the tools like BZ, but I was worried that it was overloaded and too long already [18:45:34] we need to get that to being less buggy [18:45:45] scientes: the "Visual Editor"? for sure. [18:45:47] I guess the feedback too is easier ;) [18:45:56] hi pepribal -- https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:LocalSettings.php [18:46:08] gloo, paulproteus, Thorncrag, shadowspar, Krenair, scientes : Thanks so much for your good questions and helpful insights! I am always invigorated by barn raising events like these, because it gives us really actionable feedback to work on. [18:46:30] pepribal: see in the info box there, "LocalSettings.php" is in the root directory on your server where you copied/unzipped the MediaWiki files. [18:46:31] just for the record i had no idea about this event [18:46:34] lol [18:46:40] Can we register ourselves for auto-mail, whenever the sessions are scheduled ? [18:46:47] since we're winding down on what did not go well, let's talk about what we could do to improve the experience for future test events [18:47:10] Yogi3: I'll certainly email you (and all who signed up) with info on that. [18:47:10] events like this are a new thing at WMF and very experimental right now [18:47:13] I guess the main thing I do with wikipedia is "scratch my personal itch" while reading it, which is higly rewarding, but is not really a workflow that fits the feedback tool [18:47:15] hi sumanah, I've seen that page, however it says that this file is available as a download, that it doesn't come with the install... I've checked and it's not in the root dir of the wiki install [18:47:22] Okay [18:47:31] although some good feedback on stuff I created might be highly rewarding and positive feedback+encouragement [18:47:40] scientes: yeah [18:47:40] and more interesting than that barn-star type stuff [18:47:57] pepribal: did you run the installer? [18:48:02] so somehow linking feedback with something like wikiblame might be effective [18:48:05] are there any other models we could borrow from in your experience? I based most of my planning on what the Weekend Testers organization does [18:48:27] (fallowed by crazy idea to move to git or similar for content tracking) [18:48:27] sumanah: I installed using the one-click process provided by the hosting provider [18:48:28] did anyone else come away feeling like they still have things to sift through or investigate further? [18:48:41] This is really on me, but it'd be great to have a very-clear checklist of setup dependencies for the event. [18:48:47] I'm not sure if a post-test-run communal bugwriting time would be helpful or not..? [18:48:49] pepribal: installation process would have given you an option to downlaod the LocalSettings.php with the values you gave in the installer [18:48:50] For example, some people hadn't used IRC before, and so emailed me past 10am about that. [18:48:56] BTW, good job people dealing with time zones for this! [18:49:03] Yogi3: if you're on Twitter or Identi.ca then you can subscribe to @MediaWikiMeet .... there is no events mailing list yet [18:49:04] shadowspar: noted, that's a good point [18:49:22] scientes, I wish we had some sort of blame tool built into mediawiki [18:49:24] link: i maintain a list of articles i did significant editing to on my user page, could a script do a reaonable job at this task? [18:49:35] srikanthlogic: ok, I'll ask them [18:49:40] paulprot1us: too, I ran into that. if I'd read more throughly I would have made a point of bringing some newer browsers, in accordance with the "platforms of interest" ^_^; [18:49:46] a page that lists "most actively contributed pages" [18:49:46] testing can certainly continue past the event, but how to make that fun and interesting? [18:49:47] Krenair: you know about "WikiBlame" by WMDE, right? [18:49:48] for each user [18:49:52] Yes, I do, sumanah [18:50:05] scientes: Yes, and it could be backed by git. (: [18:50:18] I would be grateful if people could fill in our short survey about the feedback form today: https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/aft5-6 That would mean a lot to us! [18:50:20] paulprot1us, except git really isn't best at massive projects [18:50:26] Yogi3: Abhi9 - you can also hold your own editing events or testing events, in person [18:50:34] gloo ^ [18:50:36] paulprot1us, and I'm not sure has good enough threading [18:50:37] shadowspar: Cool. I have some ideas on a visual tool for helping people prepare for events like these, both online and in person. [18:50:45] scientes: Interesting. [18:50:57] but the workflows of git, and feature-set, certainly [18:51:05] 03(NEW) ALT text box is observed without the validation. Able to insert the Junk character for alternative Link text. - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/37432 normal; MediaWiki: JavaScript; (a.sejpal) [18:51:24] I enjoyed that Sumana has been improving the quality of bugs filed during the event. [18:51:30] so before people start taking off, I want to thank you all personally, this has been a lot of fun and we at WMF and Openhatch learned a lot from you [18:51:31] :) [18:51:34] https://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/Editathon and https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Volunteer_coordination_and_outreach/Event_planning have some useful links for people who want to plan events. Lcawte ran one last fall [18:51:39] paulprot1us, cause one of the best (and most controversial) features of git is that it tracks **content** and not **files** (/pages) [18:51:44] Ooops, sorry, I gave you the link to the survey about the Option 6 feedback form, for which we have a lot of feedback already. But we need more feedback on how to improve the Feedback Page, at this correct URL: https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/aft5-5 [18:51:46] paulprot1us: cool, that'd be super-useful in a wider sense. While there are definitely legit reasons, I'm always surprised how many ppl show up to F/OSS events without having prepared or coordinated a bit first. ^_^; [18:51:54] paulprot1us, so doing a blame requires walking the ENTIRE tree [18:51:55] 03(mod) OH-AFT - ALT text box is observed without the validation. Able to insert the Junk character for alternative Link text. - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/37432 summary (10Sumana Harihareswara) [18:52:04] paulproteus: I agree, sumanah: bug reports look great :) [18:52:07] which for obvious reasons wouldn't wrk for wikipedia [18:52:19] in the last few minutes, any other questions or comments? [18:52:34] thanks tparveen & Asheesh [18:52:47] Thanks to those who came by! [18:52:49] #37432 is it valid feedback ? [18:52:50] Oh -- one more thing [18:52:54] but a feature "most contrivuted to pages" for each user---that seems very doable, and useful [18:52:57] i think that should be added [18:52:59] If you guys would like to be updated on our progress with Article Feedback, sign up for our newsletter here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Article_Feedback_Tool/Version_5#Newsletter [18:53:23] If you want to get involved in reading discussions between developers about Wikimedia and MediaWiki tech projects, join the https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l mailing list. [18:53:33] I have personally found it quite enlightening to just read mails on these development lists over the years. [18:53:37] we have a lot of resources available :) [18:53:44] chris_mcmahon: Generic question on wm bugzilla. Why don't we use bug templates. I found redhat's bz more friendlier like it asked questions to capture bug data [18:53:44] !b 37432 [18:53:44] https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37432 [18:54:00] If you are interested in learning more about our editor engagement program (which includes Article Feedback), sign up for the newsletter here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Editor_Engagement [18:54:03] checking, Abhi9 [18:54:28] about the % helpful field, may i suggest showing the fraction of people who found it helpful (e.g. 18/20) as the text and the % as the tooltip instead? [18:54:38] srikanthlogic: we're planning to make improvements to BZ Real Soon Now [18:54:40] Sorry I missed the last 45 minutes of the debrief.Was dragged into something else.Would continue with the testing [18:54:45] Mohinder: ok! [18:55:00] chris_mcmahon: great! [18:55:00] paulproteus: Thanks for inviting people to join the wikitech-l mailing list, great idea! [18:55:04] Mohinder: you and everyone else can keep testing as long as you want, but people are also doing a small retrospective now [18:55:32] Mohinder: we're winding down the exercise, formal stop in five minutes [18:55:51] srikanthlogic: we did provide a link that prefilled some fields, but I see your poinbt [18:55:55] What is the most important thing we need to do to make the article feedback tool better, if you had to pick one request? [18:56:12] * Reedy refrains from answering [18:56:18] hi Reedy [18:56:31] Abhi9: I think you should post another comment and give a little more elaboration, saying what you think the behavior should be (what should be filtered out and why) [18:56:37] "0% found it helpful" is indistinguishable from "nobody voted on this comment" [18:56:58] Hey reedy, I hope you will give us your answer after everyone else has chimed in ;o) [18:57:10] Abhi9: for example, what if I actually do want to link to a search for a certain symbol? [18:57:19] When you finish leaving feedback, it should emphasize that you've helped Wikipedia, and show you a big box that says, "These five pages also need editing" or some other clear call to action about getting more involved [18:57:26] gloo: Thanks! We will make sure to fix that issue next week. [18:58:18] @chris Found issue running in IE8 after a while and feedback limits string length if without spaces [18:58:19] That's the one thing I would emphasize changing. Think of it in terms of annoying but effective upselling [18:58:19] ok, 9 bugs filed (that I can see) [18:58:35] paulproteus: Great idea, thank you! I hadn't thought of taking them to other articles that need editing. Right now, we give them a CTA that only invites them to edit the current article. [18:58:43] any plans for allowing people to comment on other comments? [18:58:50] Mohinder: would you file that bug? [18:59:09] The current CTA does not yell nearly loud enough. It should take over the screen. [18:59:17] ohm your right sumanh!! but Alternative text for Link should be combination of symbol + character Not only symbol Right ?? [18:59:26] gloo: Yes, we are looking into allowing people to respond to comments. We may be able to squeeze that feature in July. [18:59:41] Will do Chris [18:59:42] This form makes it easy for you to include the right keyword, Mohinder - https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=MediaWiki%20extensions&component=ArticleFeedbackv5&keywords=aftv5-1.5 [18:59:46] fabriceflorin, good to know [18:59:49] paulproteus: Got it. We will make the CTA more compelling. [18:59:53] (: [19:00:08] OK, time for formal stop of the exercise. Thanks again! I'm sure a few people will still be hanging out here for a while, feel free to do that also. [19:00:14] Abhi9: go ahead and say what you think in the bug comment, and developers who have thought about this more than i have will answer you ;) [19:00:33] and feel free to test Wikipedia any time [19:00:43] If any of you have other ideas after this testing is over, you are welcome to add suggestions on this AFT5 talk page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Article_Feedback_Tool/Version_5 [19:00:54] chris_mcmahon: thanks for bringing this event together, and I dare say it was even more fun than I thought! [19:01:07] (or if you had ideas or insights in general about this tool, please post them to that "talk page") [19:01:11] paulprot1us: was my pleasure, thanks for all your help [19:01:18] Feel guilty not being able to spend more time exploring the APP [19:01:23] *nodnod* this was good times; getting a bunch of motivated people together to bash on some software often is =) [19:01:23] Mohinder: well, you can do that now! [19:01:43] And filling out the short survey about the feedback page would be extremely helpful to us: https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/aft5-5 [19:01:43] Mohinder: I'll be here to discuss stuff with you and anyone else who wants to talk, for at least 45 more min [19:02:01] sumanah only junk symbol shouldn’t indicate valid Hot spot Link. ALT Text has some validation at least with some symbols !! [19:02:04] ok Thanks ... [19:02:07] :) [19:03:33] I'll be heading out now. Thanks to all who organized and participated in this event! [19:03:38] A few more things that might interest the new participants here, like Abhi9, Mohinder, and Yogi3 and gloo : 1) If you want some guidance in beginning to edit Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Teahouse [19:03:45] gloo: hope to see you here again soon [19:04:08] 2) if you know anyone who is looking for a job, the Wikimedia Foundation is hiring http://jobs.wikimedia.org/ [19:04:28] Thanks guys I will hand around for a while.Come back for a chat if I find you here.Keep the window open if that is feasible. Otherwise Chereo! [19:04:28] Thank you all for helping us make Wikipedia better! I'm going to take off now, but am really grateful for all that you did for us today, it is very helpful to us. [19:04:38] 3) If you're interested in learning to work with us on a technical level, more, read these tutorials: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Category:Tutorials [19:05:01] sumanah: Good call to send people to the Teahouse -- it's an awesome place to meeting other editors, both new and experienced. [19:05:31] So Reedy, what's the one thing you would do to improve article feedback? [19:05:33] One of our most senior developers started off just editing a wiki. [19:05:39] Well, at least one, probably all of them! [19:06:06] the "Learn more" links on request oversight etc dont link me anywhere.. is it just me ? [19:06:07] sumanah: speaking of jobs, the WMF QA team is really growing by leaps & bounds [19:06:21] is there a long term plan to add more after the current openings? ^_^ [19:06:30] New patchset: Amire80; "bug 31904 Bamini layout fixes and tests" [mediawiki/extensions/Narayam] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10749 [19:06:33] shadowspar: you've already skimmed https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Engineering/2012-13_Goals ? [19:06:52] srikanthlogic: Sorry about the Learn More links, we just finished writing the FAQs and haven't updated them yet. Would you mind filing a bug anyway? [19:06:54] shadowspar: that includes our hiring plans for 2012-2013. I simply don't know what the budget will look like in a year [19:07:09] 03(mod) Bamini keyboard map needs fix + Unit Tests - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/31904 +comment (10Amir E. Aharoni) [19:07:11] fabriceflorin: ah okay, yes [19:07:25] sumanah: cool! thanks, that answers my question, and others besides ^_^; [19:07:30] @sumanh might take you on for the job opportunity [19:07:52] !tabcompletion | Mohinder [19:07:52] Mohinder : Instead of manually typing another person's nickname in IRC, you can type the beginning of their name and hit TAB on your keyboard to get it autocompleted, like on the command line. This avoids misspellings. Just make sure it's the right person! [19:08:31] Mohinder: yep, open source is full of jobs. There's a saying that your open source portfolio is the best CV you could have [19:09:22] fabriceflorin: now that the formal time is over -- I don't really have a "one best thing" ^_^; but a couple of the things I was looking for were -- [19:09:30] in the not-too-distant future we'll be running events like this for browser test automation :) [19:09:41] 1) a link from the feedback dialog to the feedback page, _before_ leaving feedback [19:09:50] 2) a way to leave feedback from the feedback page itself [19:10:32] 03(NEW) Insert table allows to enter table with Columns "-1" & after inserting table, Preview of Rows are not displayed. - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/37433 major; MediaWiki: Page editing; (sharma.yogesh) [19:10:42] 3) making it more visually obvious yes/no/abuse toggles are set -- it's pretty subtle at the moment ^_^; [19:11:22] 03(NEW) OH-AFT - "Learn more" links on actions need to link to the help materials - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/37434 normal; MediaWiki extensions: ArticleFeedbackv5; (srik.lak) [19:11:26] how is this bug Guys ? [19:11:26] and finally 4) it's not obvious what formatting (if any) is applied to the feedback text. [19:11:44] https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/37433 [19:11:49] I was surprised when it stripped my newlines, and wasn't sure if it supported wiki formatting or now [19:11:53] *not [19:12:02] shadowspar: these are great suggestions, thank you! Can you clarify #3 a bit? [19:12:13] shadowspar: it's pretty good about supporting charsets in my experience, formatting not so much [19:12:24] 03(mod) OH-AFT: "Insert table" allows user to enter table with "-1" columns (0 rows displayed in preview) - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/37433 summary; +comment (10Sumana Harihareswara) [19:12:34] taking a look, Yogi3 [19:12:43] like: it would be MEGA-useful is you could get a auto-watchlist of changes to text that you wrote (specifically, not page-wide) [19:13:13] fabriceflorin: imho, the "helpful? Yes / No" buttons aren't visually different enough when they're "on" and when they're "off" [19:13:14] this could certainly be done with git [19:13:27] okay, Thanks for giving an appropriate title sumanah :) [19:13:46] Yogi3: :-) we're trying to prefix "OH-AFT" to all the ones we found in this session, so we can brag about how many you found! [19:13:58] for me in the default skin, at least, they go from grey to dark blue...I'm wondering if there's a way to make the visual change bigger, as it were =) [19:14:00] sumanah, haha [19:14:13] shadowspar: Got it. You point is well taken, we will try to make them more prominent highlights, I'll ask our designer to work on this next week. [19:14:55] Even if they're not about the Article Feedback Tool. [19:14:55] Yogi3: have you ever heard of the "minimal reproducible case"? [19:14:58] fabriceflorin: thanks! it's just my opinion; others may find them to be just fine. but that's my two cents ^_^; [19:15:03] Nice, LocalSettings.php thing is fixed... However, is it normal that going to Help:Contents, I get an error message about the page using an invalid compression format? [19:15:14] No sumanah [19:15:15] tparveen: can you explain to Yogi3 how s/he could have improved his steps-to-reproduce in https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37433 , with special attention to making sure it's the simplest set? [19:15:37] the final thing is that I can slide in a feedback comment of >5,000 characters: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:ArticleFeedbackv5/Golden-crowned_Sparrow/132091 [19:15:46] but I'm presuming I should file that as a bug? [19:15:48] (s/his/her or his/) [19:15:53] shadowspar: I have heard people talk vaguely about similar issues, but I think you pinpointed the problem accurately, so I will give it a higher priority, thanks! [19:15:59] sumanah: sure [19:16:00] shadowspar: yeah, sounds like at least fileworthy [19:16:09] 03(NEW) Templates > Cite / Web > Date text box(DT-Picker) is observed without the validation. Able to insert invalid date. - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/37435 critical; MediaWiki: JavaScript; (a.sejpal) [19:16:28] chris_mcmahon: yes, I poked at the charsets a bit, and happily everything seemed to come through intact =) [19:16:40] actually im trying to show off in the bug that there is a Validation on table saying u cannot insert table with zero rows or columns [19:16:45] shadowspar: Yes, please file this as a bug. I thought we had that 5k character limit enforced. [19:17:04] thats y i added those steps to make it clear that it is a bug :) [19:17:16] 03(mod) OH-AFT - Able to insert invalid date in date picker template - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/37435 summary (10Sumana Harihareswara) [19:17:31] So the question is, after a new install, must I do something so that Help:Contents is accessible? [19:18:05] Ok, folks, I have to go now. Thanks again for all your great bugs and feedback! I hope we get a chance to work together again, and will suggest to Chris that we do another session like this before we try to deploy the tool to 100% of the Wikipedia. [19:18:22] Yogi3: absolutely! yes! complete steps to reproduce are a great idea. But one should try to make sure that the steps are both complete, and as simple as possible [19:18:37] Yogi3: I am reading your bug report...you are trying to show that the -1 for rows was taken as an input when it should have given an error and stopped without inserting the table correct? [19:18:38] as general as possible [19:19:02] Yogi3: for example: did you need to specifically go to the Article Feedback page in order to make this bug happen? or did it happen even if you approached the edit from a different page? [19:19:14] yes thats correct, I was just tryin to put End user Scenario [19:19:32] Yogi3: it's good to start there, but then, think like a scientist :D [19:19:35] Yes tparveen. [19:19:44] there are other links that don't work, like My_WIki:Community_Portal, or MyWIki:Current_Events... is that normal? [19:20:03] perhaps I'm asking nonsense? [19:20:14] pepribal: it's just that a bunch of people are busy right now [19:20:18] Sumanah, thanks so much for all your great follow through! [19:20:38] tparveen, sumnah : there are two bugs which i've shown there : 1. -1 giving no error message 2. After inserting table with -1 columns remains with NO Preview [19:20:48] sumanah: ok, no problem [19:20:51] !lists | pepribal [19:20:52] pepribal : mediawiki-l and wikitech-l are the primary mailing lists for MediaWiki-related issues. See https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Mailing_lists for details. [19:21:11] pepribal: if/when people are sadly unhelpful in IRC, mediawiki-l is often helpful! [19:21:29] ok, thanks! [19:22:27] Yogi3: so the one with "0" gives you an error (which is the correct behavior) [19:22:49] yes i also mention in that step that is it Expected :) [19:22:49] Bye for now. Thanks again. Over and out. [19:22:58] Abhi9: re bug 37435, "Attachment is not viewable in your browser because its MIME type (application/octet-stream) is not one that your browser is able to display. " [19:23:00] nnnSumanah > https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/37435 -> Each & Every fields on the “Web Citation” popup page without the validation.n [19:23:10] its is expected * [19:23:43] I'm sorry, Abhi9, could you rephrase that? I think you forgot a verb. :) [19:24:53] paulproteus: chris_mcmahon: now there are 12 bugs whose summaries include "OH-AFT" . So as you can see, hanging out after the end of the announced session pays off...... [19:25:17] each & every doesn't have validation on "web citation" popup page. [19:25:25] Thorncrag: can you edit Wikipedia on that iPad? have you run into any issues? [19:25:34] :) [19:25:38] sumanah: Yes, and no [19:25:39] Abhi9: each and every what? [19:25:44] sumanah: my is on the way, but let me answer Yogi3 first and then I will complete it [19:25:49] 03(mod) OH-AFT "Improve this page" feedback widget shows "Remove this tool?" X only in Firefox - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/37426 summary (10Rick Scott ("shadowspar")) [19:25:57] now there are 13. =) [19:26:00] :) [19:26:28] Krenair: check out https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_%28technical%29#Improving_Documentation_on_Handling_Bug_Reports [19:26:33] which andre__ just wrote [19:26:38] All the fields like URLS, access date with out the perfect validation. [19:27:33] sumanah: Hmm, I never thought to check the mobile version of the site [19:27:33] Yogi3: yes...ok..so first, your bug report is good so keep up the good reporting that you have.... [19:27:35] Abhi9: ok, so let me make sure I'm getting your report correct: on the "web citation" popup tool, there are several fields (such as "access date" and "URL") that include no validation, so people are able to enter corrupt or bad data. Is that correct? [19:27:37] don't have validation for the Data & URL fields.. able to insert the any thing for Date & URLS [19:28:03] Abhi9: what about the other fields in the "web citation" popup tool? [19:28:08] Thanks tparveen [19:28:21] Its 12:56 AM over hea and i dint had my dinner :o [19:28:23] Yogi3: agreeing with tparveen! your bug report is basically good! I just want to help you make your future reports even better [19:28:35] Yogi3: if I were filing this, I probably would not put 5 and 6 , I would put those at the end as a note if needed. [19:29:20] Yes, I will make sure to do more better in a specific and general way which is easier to understand [19:29:47] tparveen: can you point Yogi3 to a good example bug report? [19:31:06] tparveen : The point is correct, I agree. But as i had two bugs in mind thats y i kept them in Repro Steps [19:31:26] sumanah: I just tried to pull it up on the mobile version and it's completely non-functional [19:31:34] Yogi3: do you think it's best to explain/report two issues combined in 1 bug report? or do you think it's better to file 2 separate bug reports? [19:31:36] All I see are huge masses of numbers [19:31:54] Thorncrag: wow, that's a terrible experience, unless we're suddenly plugging you into The Matrix [19:32:03] There should be validation for all fields.. why we are allowing the end users to insert symbols in other field like name ???n [19:32:11] Yes but the thing was that i was unsure about the functionality given by developer . [19:32:19] sumanah: seriously! it's weird, I should take a screenshot [19:32:26] Yogi3: also as a general rule, if you have two bugs, it is a good idea to seperate them and file them as two separate bugs - because if you file two bugs in one, if one gets fixed, the bug can not be closed until the other one is fixed... [19:32:37] Yogi3: understood! so, it's ok to ask questions in bug reports. [19:32:49] sumanah : Take a Scenario where user only wants Rows and no columns in table. In that case only Preview bug is applicable [19:32:51] Yogi3: example: "I am seeing _________. Is that the desired functionality?" [19:32:53] 03(NEW) Change "Talk Namespaces" on the Kurdish wikis - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/37436 normal; MediaWiki: General/Unknown; (ghybu.w) [19:33:06] Thorncrag: yes, please take a screenshot and file it! [19:33:16] Thorncrag: Product: MediaWiki extensions. Component: "MobileFrontend" [19:33:44] Abhi9: ok! so now you have some things you should add as comments to your bug report :-) (basically what you and I have been saying in our conversation just now) [19:34:10] sumanah : I dint get [19:35:13] yeah [19:36:02] Yogi3: I'm sorry, I didn't understand you. Are you saying that I said something you didn't understand? :) [19:36:34] sumanah : yes...about this one - Yogi3: example: "I am seeing _________. Is that the desired functionality?" [19:36:38] I know you must also be hungry. [19:36:49] Yogi3: I was giving an example of the kind of question that it is ok to put in your Bugzilla bug report. [19:36:50] Ahahahaaa..thats fine :) [19:37:20] Can we join back in 15 mins? [19:37:46] I'll be here. [19:37:52] :) ok [19:37:59] Okay, See ya in 15 mins :) [19:38:04] Happy Testing ! [19:38:31] Yogi3: You can ask questions, that is fine..when you are testing, if you are not sure about an expected behavior, you can put "your" expected behavior and actual behavior..that way whoever is reviewing the bug and assigning it will be able to figure out if it is expected or not [19:39:10] Thanks tparveen [19:39:13] Yogi3: but I would check to see first if there is a test plan or feature document where it lists how the expected behavior should be, ask if someone can answer [19:39:25] tparveen: can you give an example of a bug report that includes that kind of question from the tester? [19:39:46] sumanah: yes I am... [19:40:56] sumanah: I have not seen a bug report with such questions in the bug, let me look... [19:41:55] 03(mod) OH-AFT - Able to insert invalid date in date picker template - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/37435 +comment (10Abhinav) [19:42:48] 03(mod) OH-AFT - Able to insert invalid date and URL in web citation template - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/37435 summary (10Sumana Harihareswara) [19:42:59] thanks for the clarification, Abhi9! I have therefore also updated the "summary" (title) of the issue. [19:43:56] 03(NEW) Amending system messages - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/37437 enhancement; MediaWiki extensions: Semantic MediaWiki; (mediawiki) [19:44:36] https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc=oh-aft&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr -- [19:44:49] 03(mod) Amending system messages - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/37437 +i18n (10[[kgh]]) [19:45:08] sorry, https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc=oh-aft&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr [19:45:36] 14(INVALID) OH-AFT - Able to insert invalid date and URL in web citation template - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/37435 (10Krinkle) [19:46:32] New review: Krinkle; "(no comment)" [mediawiki/core] (master); V: 0 C: 2; - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10748 [19:46:35] Change merged: Krinkle; [mediawiki/core] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10748 [19:47:26] hey Krinkle, why is that bug invalid? [19:47:36] sumanah: I left a comment [19:47:46] Krinkle: weird, bz email didn't send it to me [19:47:53] ok [19:47:55] sorry [19:47:58] np [19:49:13] 03(mod) OH-AFT - Able to insert invalid date and URL in web citation template - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/37435 +comment (10Sumana Harihareswara) [19:50:08] 03(mod) OH-AFT - Able to insert invalid date and URL in web citation template - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/37435 +comment (10Krinkle) [19:50:09] thx [19:50:54] 03(mod) Change "Talk Namespaces" on the Kurdish wikis - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/37436 +comment (10Krenair) [19:51:39] 03(NEW) OH-AFT: Possible to enter feedback of >5,000 characters - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/37438 normal; MediaWiki extensions: ArticleFeedbackv5; (wikimedia-bz) [19:52:22] 03(NEW) OH-AFT: There should be a text limit for the feedback that the users are entering - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/37439 enhancement; MediaWiki extensions: ArticleFeedbackv5; (tauhida.parveen) [19:52:27] shadowspar: thanks for the report! hey, what is it about the number "5000 characters" that makes it the limit here? [19:52:57] 14(DUP) OH-AFT: There should be a text limit for the feedback that the users are entering - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/37439 +comment (10Sumana Harihareswara) [19:52:58] 03(mod) OH-AFT: Possible to enter feedback of >5,000 characters - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/37438 +comment (10Sumana Harihareswara) [19:53:43] sumanah: aha, that's a good question [19:53:53] tparveen: no offense meant to you, of course. It's just that shadowspar's report came in about 2 seconds before yours! [19:53:56] on v6 of the form it says "5000 characters remaining" [19:53:59] sumanah: wait did we just file the same bug? [19:54:00] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden-crowned_Sparrow?aftv5_form=6&aftv5_link=E [19:54:11] but on v1 it says no such thing [19:54:15] sumanah: yes when I started filing it there were no duplicate [19:54:33] sumanah: I guess he beat me to it... [19:54:45] shadowspar: ahhhh, interesting, could you note that in a comment? also maybe add the keyword "design" because the question of how long we should let people talk is a design issue...... [19:54:52] * sumanah avoids possible midair collision [19:54:52] I'm sort of following along but mostly I'm putting the last of my stuff in boxes, I move house first thing in the morning. [19:54:56] *snerk* bug submission collision! [19:55:13] 03(mod) Change "Talk Namespaces" on the Kurdish wikis - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/37436 +comment (10Krinkle) [19:55:21] tparveen: shadowspar - great minds test alike? :D [19:55:22] tparveen: I think we should both be able to take credit; we should file a bug against bugzilla for that =) [19:56:17] shadowspar: hmm, maybe in 5 years BZ will include sort of Etherpad-related "wait, someone else is filing that same bug right now!" pseudo-AI and suggest to one of the authors that y'all merge the issue? [19:56:27] shadowspar: :) you have the credit... [19:56:46] tparveen: also your find is on a different platform than mine...so between us, I think we have all the bases covered ^_^; [19:57:11] sumanah: I was surprised to see the "possible duplicates" as I was typing the bug subject in! I don't think I've seen that in any other bz instance [19:57:34] chris_mcmahon: oh..? where are you moving to/from, iydmma? [19:57:42] I thought you were back in durango again at last count. =) [19:58:22] shadowspar: I'm happy it exists! I think it MIGHT exist on GetSatisfaction as well? [19:58:28] cannot recall [19:58:31] shadowspar: this is my last day in Santa Fe. moving back to my house in Durango tomorrow [19:58:38] 03(mod) A user-defined property is reported as a special one (1.7.1) - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/35761 summary (10[[kgh]]) [19:59:51] chris_mcmahon: excellent! moving always kinda sucks, but I hope everything goes as smoothly as possible. =) [20:02:09] hi Abhi9 & Yogi3 & Mohinder .... what region are you in? [20:02:47] my parents are from Karnataka but I live in New York City. [20:04:57] I am originally from Panjab but left India 40 years ago.Now in England [20:04:59] k, I have to go pick up the kids. thanks for putting this on, everybody; this was good fun and I learned a bunch =) [20:05:29] :) [20:05:39] shadowspar: we can't be DW but we try [20:05:41] ;-) [20:06:03] sumanah: *snerk* [20:06:04] Mohinder: Lcawte is planning on running a Wikimedia technical event in England this autumn [20:06:14] there has to be room for diversity of F/OSS projects too. =) [20:06:16] 03(mod) action=raw should not output an HTML error page - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/37140 +comment (10Krinkle) [20:06:29] shadowspar: :) [20:06:39] Im from India [20:06:51] I'm Back [20:07:02] Hi [20:07:16] is there a way to have pages with math titles like to have a page $e^x$ or something and then it is rendered properly? [20:07:42] hi Yogi3 & Abhi9 -- srikanthlogic is one of the people planning another Indian "hackathon" sometime soon [20:08:20] Could you keep me updated when it happens? I am on twitter @mpkhosla [20:08:45] yeah I'm from india- Hyderabad & Gujurat ! [20:08:47] Mohinder: if you talk to Lcawte on his "talk page" at http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:Lcawte then I'm sure he'll keep you up to date [20:08:57] Sure [20:09:21] sumanah : what is Indian "hackathon" ? [20:09:24] Abhi9: Yogi3 - you can give a note to srikanthlogic via https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User_talk:Logicwiki [20:09:44] Mohinder: I suggest you also subscribe to @MediaWikiMeet and we'll tell you about future IRC and in-person events [20:09:52] nnI came know abt mohinder @ weekend testing Americas n [20:10:25] Abhi9: cool, am at Hyderabad too. we could do an casual one at Lamakaan over snacks sometime [20:10:34] Yogi3: a hackathon is a face-to-face event where people learn about some technology, work together to make things, and have fun. It's usually free to attend, sometimes it's half a day and sometimes it's multiple days [20:10:55] Me too from Hyderabad :) [20:11:09] sometimes they are called "hacker cons" or "hackdays" or "hackfests" or something like that [20:11:12] okay [20:11:14] @MediaWikiMeet is twitter account or something you subscribe through other means [20:11:17] they are usually fairly informal [20:11:24] Mohinder: Twitter or Identi.ca will work! [20:12:00] Srikanthlogic Sure !! willl plan to meet [20:12:13] Yogi3: Abhi9: leave a message on my talk, may be we can plan an informal one soon :) [20:12:35] It is twitter id [20:12:45] Yogi3: examples: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/GLAMcamp_NYC https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Brighton_Hackathon_2011 https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Chennai_Hackathon_March_2012 [20:13:12] What irc about? [20:13:25] sumanah:Yogi3: I was trying to find you a bug with questions in it and I have to say that looking at all the (new) bugs from AFT, the bug reports from today looks great...I mean almost all of them have the steps to reproduce...(which to me is the most important part since that is what drives retesting)...some participants said that they have not used BZ in a long time, I can't tell from the reports... [20:14:04] Thanks sumanah :) [20:14:13] srikanthlogic nActually, Me & yogi are flat mate. living in near to gachibowli. n [20:14:21] New patchset: IAlex; "Changed two remaining calls to Language::timeanddate() to Language::userTimeAndDate() in includes/specials." [mediawiki/core] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10750 [20:15:01] tparveen: yay, it's good that all the bug reports from today look pretty good! .... I was hoping we could show Yogi3 an example of a bug report -- of any sort, from any project, closed or not -- that has some questions in it, so that Yogi3 can see a model. [20:15:28] hmmm [20:15:30] New review: Krinkle; "(no comment)" [mediawiki/core] (master); V: 0 C: 1; - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/7357 [20:15:32] Mohinder: I'm not sure what you're asking. "What is IRC about?"? "What should we talk about in IRC?"? [20:16:00] I am looking...if I find one, I will send it to him...every report has good and "can improvement" parts [20:16:20] srikanthlogic : can you please your email id / skepy id. [20:16:25] New review: jenkins-bot; "Build Successful " [mediawiki/core] (master); V: 1 C: 0; - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10750 [20:16:29] New review: Krinkle; "(no comment)" [mediawiki/extensions/WikiEditor] (master); V: 1 C: 2; - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/9751 [20:16:31] Change merged: Krinkle; [mediawiki/extensions/WikiEditor] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/9751 [20:16:35] *can you please share email address [20:16:38] Yogi3: one way I learned to write good bug report is to look through other bug reports and see if I can follow them and pick the best from each [20:16:55] Abhi9: srik.lak/gmail [20:17:07] yeah right yogi !! [20:17:13] Thanks srikanthlogic [20:17:47] tparveen: how about https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2937 ? [20:18:21] sumanah: do you have the whole database memorized? [20:18:28] a few others - https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17461 https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12902 https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=164 [20:19:00] tparveen: no! I ran a search on the MediaWiki & MediaWiki extensions products, looking for bugs that had the following strings in the comments: functionality sure what [20:19:29] and then I skimmed a few of the results [20:20:00] this after I tried a similar search on functionality desired sure what [20:20:10] but that didn't pan out. [20:24:11] sumanah: whom should I copy on parser function related bug ? [20:24:17] lwin w [20:24:24] d'oh [20:24:35] srikanthlogic: Gabriel Wicke, Audrey Tang, subbu..... [20:24:36] * srikanthlogic misses hexmode [20:24:44] srikanthlogic: "Subramaniam Sastry" I think his name is? [20:25:01] sumanah: thanks! [20:25:16] New patchset: IAlex; "Added missing GPLv2 headers in some places." [mediawiki/core] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10751 [20:25:29] srikanthlogic: if there's any part of the post-hexmode era I can help with, please do let me know [20:25:38] srikanthlogic: Krenair is also helping out with the front lines of new bug patrol [20:26:32] sumanah : you're from ? [20:26:44] Yogi3: My parents are from Karnataka, and I live in New York City [20:26:53] sumanah: bugs getting tagged and copied properly. https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37207 has caught no one's eyes.. [20:26:55] okay [20:27:17] New review: jenkins-bot; "Build Successful " [mediawiki/core] (master); V: 1 C: 0; - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10751 [20:27:24] u're working with ? [20:27:38] can i have ur skype id :) [20:27:41] srikanthlogic: ah, ok. sorry [20:27:44] Why did we pick IRC instead of Skype? [20:27:53] Yogi3: no, sorry. but you can learn more about me at https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:Sumanah [20:28:08] sumanah: I keep a look out for i18n / shell bugs and tag them, but there are few bugs which will miss most of our eyes and if it comes from a newbie, will probably be lost [20:28:32] Mohinder: The mass of the Wikimedia technical community hangs out here. So we got the beneficial drop-in effect that people like srikanthlogic, Krenair, and so on were already here and could help out. That's one reason [20:29:22] Mohinder: also, IRC is open source, and Skype isn't. We prefer to use open source tools whenever possible, especially because then we can hack them and their APIs. For example, we have "bots" that speak up in this channel when there's a new bug filed! That's easy with IRC, not with Skype. [20:29:31] I get an email through wikibugs-l when someone makes a new bug. That way it's easy to just go through and tag new bugs correctly [20:30:26] Mohinder: There are good IRC client applications for Mac, Windows, and Linux. The Linux client for Skype is pretty bad. [20:31:09] Ugh. Skype for Linux's UI design is terrible. [20:31:55] Mohinder: however -- and chris_mcmahon and our future QA Volunteer Coordinator are the people who will decide stuff -- it could be that people will try future events in Skype, or on Facebook, or something like that. And of course you can lead an event yourself, and choose the venue to hold it in! [20:32:32] The Hollywood Bowl. [20:33:10] Does IRC active all the time or you logon at certain times? [20:34:04] There's some parts of the day where it's not so active obviously [20:34:09] this IRC channel is nice because it's logged, and we'll be able to go back and re-read the discussion. [20:34:40] this sort of event is really new for us, and we have a lot to learn [20:35:30] 03(mod) Permanent URL on Special:Cite page should encode URL in unicode - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/37207 +comment (10Srikanth Logic) [20:35:40] 03(mod) Permanent URL on Special:Cite page should encode URL in unicode - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/37207 (10Srikanth Logic) [20:35:53] It's good to know that there is lot going for wikipedia/media [20:36:19] sumanah: 37201 I still couldn't get email ID of folks you mentioned but for one. [20:37:08] Hi there! [20:37:13] Mohinder: there sure is! [20:37:14] Hi [20:37:19] Mohinder: have you seen the monthly engineering report? [20:37:22] Hello [20:37:27] 03(mod) Several history entries for the same content - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/37225 +comment (10Daniel Kinzler) [20:37:30] actually, the monthly report in general https://blog.wikimedia.org/c/corporate/wmf-monthly-reports/ [20:37:42] srikanthlogic: ok, I shall add [20:37:47] !b 37201 [20:37:47] https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37201 [20:37:51] sumanah: thanks [20:39:35] blargh, srikanthlogic, you gave me the wrong bug ID! [20:39:53] oops.. https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37207 it is [20:41:47] I need a way to remove the view source tab when a user is not logged in, I know this doesnt stop them from viewing source but no-logged in users are my targets, i want to give them a clean layout [20:42:04] No I have not seen the monthly report.I will check out the above link [20:42:10] bye everyone, thanks again. [20:42:23] Mohinder, can you help me out? [20:42:46] Bye Chris! [20:43:04] I need a way to remove the view source tab when a user is not logged in, I know this doesnt stop them from viewing source but no-logged in users are my targets, i want to give them a clean layout [20:43:40] a lot of people appear to be here, [20:43:53] can i get some help pls and thank you [20:44:32] I am not sure what you mean.Are you talking about the chat window or referring to something else? [20:44:33] muqman: hi [20:44:41] here's my question: [20:44:45] muqman: I got your question [20:44:49] oh [20:44:50] muqman: no need to repeat. [20:44:52] okay [20:44:58] !hidetabs | muqman [20:44:58] muqman: To hide tabs see the FAQ Note that hiding the edit tab does not disallow editting; see !userrights for that [20:45:01] muqman: so, you are the administrator of a MediaWiki installation, right? [20:45:06] thought you missed it :D [20:45:41] Mohinder, was that for me? [20:45:44] muqman: no. and it's generally considered rude to repeat your question over and over again in an open source project's IRC channel. You should assume that people are going to take a few minutes to prepare their answers. [20:46:07] yes i am the admin [20:46:10] ok [20:46:20] muqman: see what Amgine just said to you. There's your answer. [20:46:22] im new with irc and stuff so im learning :D [20:46:38] I got nothing? [20:46:49] what wm-bot said. [20:46:51] !hidetabs | muqman [20:46:51] muqman : To hide tabs see the FAQ Note that hiding the edit tab does not disallow editting; see !userrights for that [20:46:57] ah [20:47:08] okay, ill see that [20:47:16] lets hope it works ;) [20:47:21] [20:47:38] slight problem guys [20:47:50] it will hide the edit tab even for the admins [20:47:52] Amgine: I hear ya! [20:48:16] muqman: then you just need to add the logic to check if logged-in. [20:48:25] 03(mod) OH-AFT "Improve this page" feedback widget shows "Remove this tool?" X only in Firefox - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/37426 +aftv5-1.5 (10Sumana Harihareswara) [20:48:49] im sorry but im a newbie so can u tell me how to do that amgine, i just setup my wiki today [20:49:29] !howto | muqman [20:49:29] muqman : https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/How_to_become_a_MediaWiki_hacker [20:49:36] ok [20:49:40] let me check that [20:49:42] muqman: ok, that's more advanced than you need, really [20:49:46] thanks guys [20:49:48] I should have given you a link to the manual page [20:50:06] https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual [20:50:42] yup i guess thats right, im not a developer for mediawiki *yet* [20:50:43] Oh... actually muqman: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:FAQ#How_do_I_hide_the_section_edit_links_for_users_who_are_not_logged_in.3F [20:50:52] ok [20:51:15] that only hides the edit on each section, not the overall [20:51:56] you know, muqman it could be that what you really want is a nice skin [20:51:57] !skin [20:51:57] There are multiple keys, refine your input: skingallery, skinning, skins, [20:52:01] !skinning [20:52:02] http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Skins>. Skin usage: . Gallery of CSS styles: . Writing your own: http://blog.redwerks.org/2012/02/08/mediawiki-skinning-tutorial/ and the historical archive [20:52:37] k [20:52:50] muqman: examples: http://teachingopensource.org/ http://wiki.blender.org/ http://userbase.kde.org/ [20:54:05] let me c [20:54:45] okay [20:54:50] i cant figure it out [20:55:07] how about hide the wiki source code from a user [20:55:17] ? [20:55:41] muqman: what is your ultimate goal? [20:55:49] muqman: I predict that what you really really want is a good user experience for your readers, right? [20:56:20] yes [20:56:47] New patchset: Lupo; "(bug 12701) Use the diff of all unseen revisions in the "new messages" bar." [mediawiki/core] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10545 [20:56:47] amgine to provide a way for users to use flash games/view animations on the wiki [20:56:48] muqman: and that's not just about whether they see that one tab/link or not [20:57:06] sumanah i guess not [20:57:11] but its a start [20:57:13] muqman: why do you want to use a wiki, instead of some other kind of website? [20:57:25] because its easy to edit [20:57:30] its easy to collaborate [20:57:40] and the gui is simple [20:57:51] muqman: you'll want to skim http://blog.redwerks.org/2012/02/08/mediawiki-skinning-tutorial/ [20:58:44] If anons cannot edit, I do not see why you would wish to prevent them seeing the source for the page. But to remove it will likely require skin hacking and other user interface tweaking, as sumanah suggests. [20:58:51] New review: jenkins-bot; "Build Successful " [mediawiki/core] (master); V: 1 C: 0; - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10545 [20:59:05] hmmm [20:59:23] wait is there a parser function that allows checks "if logged in [20:59:24] " [20:59:25] ? [21:00:08] if there is then i can hide the edit tab for all users (logged in too) and I can provide a link for logged in users [21:00:18] would that be possible on the footer? [21:04:25] or the sidebar? [21:09:47] 03(mod) "Further results" does not respect "named args" (1.7.1) - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/35208 summary (10[[kgh]]) [21:10:32] muqman: I don't know. maybe you can ask the mediawiki-l list [21:10:35] !lists | muqman [21:10:36] muqman : mediawiki-l and wikitech-l are the primary mailing lists for MediaWiki-related issues. See https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Mailing_lists for details. [21:12:59] k [21:13:34] One question [21:13:44] yes, Yogi3? [21:14:11] do we test only Wikipedia pages over here ? [21:14:50] Yogi3: The MediaWiki platform is used in many wikis, and we accept bug reports regarding any wiki that's using the MediaWiki software. [21:15:25] Yogi3: for example: en.wikisource.org , http://fanlore.org , and http://teachingopensource.org/ [21:15:54] ok [21:16:10] \nick Abhi9 [21:16:41] Guest27926: I think you meant "/nick" not "\nick" [21:16:41] \nick Abhi9 [21:17:10] welcome bk Abhi :) [21:17:15] :) [21:17:29] Yogi3: Abhi9: Mohinder: I am going to go soon and eat something and generally take care of Saturday-related activities. Hope you will pop into #mediawiki again whenever you like, do more testing, explore, join openhatch.org and generally grow [21:19:14] sumanah : nice to meet you :)...It was a good experience over here. Thanks for the motivation ! [21:19:25] also Yogi3 Abhi9 consider joining Wikimedia India: http://wiki.wikimedia.in/ https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l [21:19:28] me tooo !! enjoyed lot'z [21:19:30] glad we could help, Yogi3! [21:19:33] and Abhi9 [21:19:40] bye [21:19:47] Bye [21:19:56] Bye [21:20:03] Bye by :) [21:22:29] amgine [21:22:48] Mmm? Yes muqman? [21:22:59] I found a solution and in interest to the community i think you should know the solution [21:23:09] http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:Subfader/Hide_page_tabs [21:23:20] it is under a mediawiki user page [21:23:33] i have an account but im not sure where to put that [21:23:51] You may want to link it from the FAQ page, in the section I linked you to originally. [21:24:04] okay [21:24:10] please send me the link again [21:24:14] i lost it [21:24:15] sorry [21:24:26] !hidetabs [21:24:27] To hide tabs see the FAQ Note that hiding the edit tab does not disallow editting; see !userrights for that [21:24:32] thanks [21:24:35] yw [21:26:26] 03(mod) clicking or editing a missing special property page gives no indication that it's special (1.8 alpha) - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/11768 summary (10[[kgh]]) [21:26:26] 03(mod) mediawiki:smw_querytoolarge needs PLURAL support - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/18515 +comment (10[[kgh]]) [21:26:27] 03(mod) SMWNamespaceDescription function getQueryString special handling of NS_CATEGORY (1.8 alpha) - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/37065 summary (10[[kgh]]) [21:27:05] what is the standard ca- for read or view history [21:30:24] 03(ASSIGNED) Install Translate extension on be.wikimedia.org - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/37391 (10Dereckson) [21:31:02] 03(mod) Install Translate extension on be.wikimedia.org - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/37391 (10Sam Reed (reedy)) [21:31:44] Reedy: indeed, if the field Assigned To is empty, it couldn't be assigned. [21:31:57] It's assigned to nobody [21:32:04] which makes the status useless [21:33:05] quit ! \ Abhinav bye !!! [21:33:29] by the way, should all the bugs with a reviewed code already in Gerrit be assigned to the patch author? [21:34:26] I can't figure out how to turn off table borders - anyone know how to do this? [21:35:04] * SPQRobin wish he could simply merge such changes himself :) [21:36:07] merging them isn't enough :p [21:36:18] that one also requires db tables adding [21:36:38] Oh, I didn't know [21:37:15] Hi daviddoria [21:37:34] Could you give a link to one of your table? [21:40:20] New patchset: Mormegil; "(bug 15853) Wrong entries in history feed" [mediawiki/core] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10752 [21:42:23] New review: jenkins-bot; "Build Successful " [mediawiki/core] (master); V: 1 C: 0; - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10752 [21:44:28] Dereckson, http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK/Getting_Started/Obtain [21:46:34] Your borders are added by the wikitable class. [21:47:11] If you replace "{| class="wikitable" style="text-align: center;"" "{| style="text-align: center;"", you won't have border anymore. [21:47:21] (ie removing class="wikitable") [21:48:23] ah, so easy. thanks [21:51:02] Is there a way to set horizontal cell padding different from vertical cell padding? [21:52:38] if you define padding in css, yes: style="padding: 20px 10px 20px 10px" (order is top right bottom left) [21:52:45] (you start at the top, and go clockwise) [21:54:10] Dereckson, hm: {| style="text-align: center; padding: 20px 100px 20px 50px" [21:54:20] Doesn't seem to put any space between the cells: http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK/Getting_Started/Obtain [21:56:42] At this location, it applies the CSS property to the table itself. [21:59:17] I wonder if it wouldn't be easier for you to use http://960.gs/ [21:59:17] Is there a way to apply it to a whole row? I did this: http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK/Getting_Started/Obtain but it is just applied to the first cell [21:59:56] I don't have access to the server unfortunately [22:00:52] Do I really have to apply it to every cell ? [22:01:04] You don't need any access to the server for that, you can add this grid CSS to [[MediaWiki:Common.css]] [22:01:38] 03(mod) Change "Talk Namespaces" on the Kurdish wikis - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/37436 (10ghybu.w) [22:13:11] 03(mod) Change "Talk Namespaces" on the Kurdish wikis - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/37436 (10ghybu.w) [22:13:48] New review: Krinkle; "Please click "Abandon this change" or improve it. You can always submit a new patch set. That way it..." [mediawiki/core] (master); V: 0 C: 0; - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/3687 [22:16:07] 04(REOPENED) migrate mwmultiversion to git - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/36873 +comment (10Antoine "hashar" Musso) [22:19:55] 03(mod) cannot abandon changes in gerrit mediawiki/core - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/37096 +comment (10Antoine "hashar" Musso) [22:31:45] 03(ASSIGNED) Vector 'user' icon is low-resolution - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/35341 +comment (10Dereckson) [22:45:45] hi [22:45:55] what logic is behind the directories of uploaded images? [22:46:51] images/thumb/d/d4/bla.jpg ... how do i get /d/d4/ ? [22:47:07] 03(mod) migrate mwmultiversion to git - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/36873 +comment (10Sam Reed (reedy)) [22:48:15] New patchset: Jeroen De Dauw; "Updated message because AdminSettings.php no longer exists. Pointed out by kgh" [mediawiki/extensions/SemanticMediaWiki] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10753 [22:49:32] New review: Jeroen De Dauw; "(no comment)" [mediawiki/extensions/SemanticMediaWiki] (master); V: 1 C: 2; - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10703 [22:49:34] Change merged: Jeroen De Dauw; [mediawiki/extensions/SemanticMediaWiki] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10703 [22:49:48] aton`: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:$wgHashedUploadDirectory [22:49:50] New review: Jeroen De Dauw; "(no comment)" [mediawiki/extensions/SemanticMediaWiki] (master); V: 1 C: 2; - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10753 [22:49:52] Change merged: Jeroen De Dauw; [mediawiki/extensions/SemanticMediaWiki] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10753 [22:50:10] New review: Jeroen De Dauw; "(no comment)" [mediawiki/extensions/SemanticResultFormats] (master); V: 1 C: 2; - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10733 [22:50:12] Change merged: Jeroen De Dauw; [mediawiki/extensions/SemanticResultFormats] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10733 [22:51:44] ahoy [22:52:26] is it possible if I upload an .svg, to embed the original .svg? [[Image:Foo.svg]] always embeds a processed version Foo.svg.png [22:52:35] Reedy: i just read its done to prevent big directories... this pretty random distribution reduces the directory size by 256 at best [22:52:54] the SVG contains links (sort of like a "image-map") and I'd like to have them clickable [22:53:10] s/links/a href.../ [22:55:12] It's not pretty random [22:55:15] it's hexadecimal [22:55:18] so 16 in the first [22:55:28] and 256 in each of those [22:55:31] aton`: its not random, its the firt few characters of the hash of the filename or something [22:55:34] (upto) [22:56:05] p858snake|l: which is pretty random [22:56:19] random how? [22:56:21] Reedy: thats what i say, 256 at best [22:56:49] it's better than having millions of files int he root directory [22:56:59] of course [22:57:26] imagine 5 million pictures [22:57:36] still 20k in one dir [22:57:40] (at best) [22:57:47] evenly distributed [22:58:09] Introduced in version: 1.4.0 (r5578) [22:58:25] and that was to turn it off.. [22:58:25] is there no way to embed svg? Is https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Inline_SVG_extension what I need? [22:58:30] time for a third (and fourth) level? [22:58:34] i wondered if mediawiki supported svg natively [22:59:16] but i still wonder why make it so complicated, whats the advantage over evenly distributing images over directories? [22:59:37] I suppose it's an attempt to distribute it evenly [22:59:48] rather than using the first couple of chars of the filename as is [23:00:13] why use anything of the file? just look for the least filled directory? [23:00:32] because you would need to count each directory [23:00:37] Or record it [23:00:42] it's not replicable [23:00:52] and on a site like wikipedia, that wouldn't work well [23:01:00] you can't then go, oh File:XYZ.ext is MD5( XYZ.ext ) and work out where it is [23:01:20] so then you have to store it say in the DB, for what gain? [23:01:23] thats right [23:01:31] okay i see the point [23:01:35] aton`: and we also use the md5 elsewhere as well [23:01:49] so its all calculated and stored at the one time [23:02:00] for what else is it used? [23:02:09] dup search to name one [23:02:29] dup files should be in the same dir, right? [23:02:36] no [23:02:46] they have the same hash? [23:02:47] well kinda of [23:02:50] Krinkle: if i want to run script only in main namespace and only on viewing the page (no edit, no history etc.) what should be the condition? [23:02:59] oh [23:03:03] hash of the name [23:03:24] 03(mod) Admins & hidden edit / abuse filters - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/37335 (10Thehelpfulone) [23:05:18] huh, that must have been telepathy ;-) [23:05:23] so once more [23:05:29] Krinkle: if i want to run script only in main namespace and only on viewing the page (no edit, no history etc.) what should be the condition? [23:05:31] hi, I need a way to change the text from the tab that says "read" to "watch" or "play" [23:05:36] how can I do that? [23:06:19] thanks for your help! [23:06:35] Danny_B|backup: Check wgNamespaceNumber and wgAction [23:06:39] 0 and 'view' respectively [23:07:20] muqman: edit mediawiki:vector-view-view [23:08:03] okay [23:08:23] thanks, ill give it a go [23:11:06] Danny_B|backup thanks [23:11:12] welcome [23:12:46] New review: Jeroen De Dauw; "(no comment)" [mediawiki/extensions/SemanticMaps] (polygons); V: 1 C: 2; - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/9360 [23:12:48] Change merged: Jeroen De Dauw; [mediawiki/extensions/SemanticMaps] (polygons) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/9360 [23:13:31] Change abandoned: Jeroen De Dauw; "(no reason)" [mediawiki/extensions/WikibaseLib] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/9365 [23:14:53] New review: Jeroen De Dauw; "(no comment)" [mediawiki/extensions/SemanticMediaWiki] (polygons); V: 1 C: 2; - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/9361 [23:14:55] Change merged: Jeroen De Dauw; [mediawiki/extensions/SemanticMediaWiki] (polygons) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/9361 [23:18:45] New review: Jeroen De Dauw; "Almost there :)" [mediawiki/extensions/SemanticMediaWiki] (storerewrite); V: 0 C: -1; - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10564 [23:21:11] New patchset: Kaldari; "Fixing the display of the parameter form" [mediawiki/extensions/PageTriage] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10754 [23:23:43] what is the #ca- for the read section? [23:32:00] New review: Jeroen De Dauw; "Overall this seems good, although there are a bunch of style issues and a little unneeded code dupli..." [mediawiki/extensions/SemanticMediaWiki] (storerewrite); V: 0 C: -1; - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10706 [23:32:16] Danny_B|backup what is the access key for the read tab that you told me about? [23:34:08] New review: Jeroen De Dauw; "Awesome :)" [mediawiki/extensions/Maps] (master); V: 1 C: 2; - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10423 [23:34:10] Change merged: Jeroen De Dauw; [mediawiki/extensions/Maps] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10423 [23:35:15] Anyone active here? [23:35:49] muqman: c [23:36:01] tnx [23:36:48] New review: Jeroen De Dauw; "You're missing some spaces! :)" [mediawiki/extensions/SemanticMaps] (master); V: 0 C: -1; - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10426 [23:36:49] wait [23:37:08] im trying to actually hide the read tag [23:38:00] New review: Jeroen De Dauw; "Fantastic" [mediawiki/extensions/Maps] (master); V: 1 C: 2; - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10430 [23:38:49] New review: Jeroen De Dauw; "The markercluster stuff already got removed, which is making gerrit mad, please fix, and I'll merge" [mediawiki/extensions/Maps] (master); V: 1 C: 2; - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10430 [23:40:09] Danny_B|backup I need to know how (using css) hide the read tab, as I have no use of it in my GUI [23:41:09] #ca-view { display: none; } [23:42:05] New review: Jeroen De Dauw; "John: My 6 new inline comments are on patchset 1. And please fix the commit message!! o_O" [mediawiki/extensions/WikidataRepo] (master); V: 0 C: 0; - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/10727 [23:49:40] thanks Danny_B|backup [23:50:24] is there any way I can hide the sidebar and replace it with html? [23:51:28] !sidebar [23:51:28] To edit the navigation menu on the left, edit page [[MediaWiki:Sidebar]] on your wiki using its special syntax. For more details, see http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Interface/Sidebar