[00:00:09] yes, I am happy to see improvements [00:00:13] the extension is nice [00:00:14] ... [00:00:19] OK thanks :) [00:00:34] haven't seen this before it was deployed in the WMF wikis [00:00:57] output layout of the descriptions part: should be improved [00:01:03] sumanah: the extension registration rfc is independent of the composer one, I've tried to not break anything for composer people [00:01:07] I miss the "upload a new version" link [00:01:26] * sumanah looks at https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Extension_registration [00:01:36] ok, I was thinking about that and about https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Extension_management_with_Composer [00:01:48] This is what my users always want: easily uzpload a new image version [00:01:55] (enterprise usage) [00:02:16] (end of my comments for E:MultimediaViewer) [00:02:21] legoktm: hi [00:02:31] hello [00:02:32] thx for your E:UserMerge commits [00:02:39] allow me some tzime, please [00:02:39] :) [00:02:43] yeah, no rush [00:02:50] I'll also try and get some other people to do code review [00:03:05] legoktm: have you some reference edits of your work in other extensions ? [00:03:17] um, what do you mean? [00:03:26] uh, I don't know you yet [00:03:39] and want to learn, at what projects you committted what [00:03:42] ah [00:03:57] https://github.com/wikimedia/mediawiki-core/commits/master?author=legoktm and https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:Legoktm [00:04:04] thx [00:04:43] I have to go offline right now, bbl [00:04:48] your commit regarding the permission check was puzzling me, when you deleted my code [00:05:03] legoktm: okay, let's discuss another time [00:05:14] it's nice to see your commits [00:05:43] bear with me, and be patient (I am always so unpatient....) [00:06:03] have other issues to solve [00:06:22] but UserMerge - I need this too - should be fixed also [00:06:30] bye [00:12:13] marktraceur: perhaps you overlooked my suggestion for improvement: I'd like to have the "Upload a new version" link in E:MultimediaViewer description part [00:12:29] Wikinaut: back. [00:13:12] basically SpecialPage already had a function that implemented the permission check, so I just changed it to use that and reduce code duplication. But moving to FormSpecialPage does that anyway, so I abandoned the commit [00:13:59] legoktm: I was puzzled, because I think that my code was already checking (correctly) whether the viewer has the required permission [00:14:06] correct? [00:14:12] your code was correct [00:14:15] thx [00:14:20] next q: [00:14:40] Do you always (I do this always) test your code before you commit [00:14:46] ? [00:15:45] for me, it is always a help if committers expressly state "code tested" as a comment to their commits [00:16:04] some people here say, it is _not_ a hard requirement that code is actually tested [00:16:53] I've tested all of the patches I uploaded except for the API one [00:16:56] because they want to foster and facilitate code improvements. Personally, I have a distinct opinion and think, commited code should never break running code and should always be tested [00:17:02] if it's helpful I can leave comments saying that I did. [00:17:13] legoktm: yes, please [00:17:47] it is a help, because then we can better work together, I can merge your commit, and can be sure(almost), that it will not break... [00:18:14] ok, let me finish, it's getting late here [00:18:24] in Berlin [00:18:27] 02:18 [00:18:32] :/ [00:18:33] good night [00:18:38] good night! [00:18:52] see you later. i am now and then here, or send me a mail [00:19:19] sure [00:20:32] legoktm: are you on this list? https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/admin/groups/11,members [00:20:57] no, I have +2 everywhere since I'm in the wmf ldap group [00:21:04] well, mostly everywhere. [00:21:09] ldap? [00:21:32] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ldap [02:50:42] Anybody see the problem with this tag extension (http://goo.gl/xudI7q) that causes it to cache improperly? I often visit a page with a tag provided by this code and find non of the JavaScript is there. Add action=purge and it's back. [03:30:20] Does the behavior differ based on a user preference? [03:30:22] Or being logged in? [05:23:48] quiddity: encoding is broken? let's make a preference! https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=647403#c6 [05:28:33] Nemo_bis, my first thought was "someone has reskinned our bugzilla??! ahh, no, it's moz." second thought was "Yes! Preferences!" third thought is "Where does mozilla do their localization? do they use translatewiki, too?" [05:50:53] quiddity: no, they have multiple l10n formats stratified in years, most of which look more like programming than translation (allegedly), and IIRC each team translates where they want [06:39:36] hello. can anyone who turned the LaTeX renderer off see any page with tag in any wikipedia? (except test.wikipedia.org) [06:40:25] I see no problems in test.wikipedia, but it uses another MW version than the rest of Wikipedia. [06:40:38] qq[IrcCity]: known issue, https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/65793 [06:43:29] what the … is the «new math renderer Mathoid»? where can I read about it? [06:46:26] qq[IrcCity]: https://github.com/gwicke/mathoid is the code, I looked quickly and couldn't find any other documentation on it [06:49:31] rather good news: MathJax is an abomination. [06:50:22] whereas LaTeX/PNG is an ugly 20th-century technology. [06:55:45] legoktm, where should I create a stub documentation about the aforementioned Mathoid? it would be an important improvement in the case of successful development. [06:57:03] qq[IrcCity]: I don't know, you probably should talk with physikerwelt about it, he's one of the main people working on it [07:00:06] qq[IrcCity]: [[mw:Mathoid]]? [07:00:11] @link [07:00:11] https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Mathoid [07:00:37] there's already something at https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Math/2#Mathoid [07:01:27] Gloria: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Talk:Bugzilla/Fields#Version [07:02:06] Anyone caring about security, please help set version field on the bugs linked in first line of https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Upgrading#Why_upgrade.3F [07:30:05] hello all [07:30:20] anybody can help me here? [07:33:26] hello [07:33:46] <_[myth> hi [07:34:32] !ask | lia [07:34:32] lia: Please feel free to ask your question: if anybody who knows the answer is around, they will surely reply. Don't ask for help or for attention before actually asking your question, that's just a waste of time – both yours and everybody else's. :) [07:36:35] well, Is it possible that mediawiki host our website, My students using mediawiki to save their article or research reports, we tried host mediawiki on our own server, the problem is we dont have enough knowledge about this software, so it will be good if my students can create the articles like in wikipedia but using our own domain name [07:41:50] have you encountered any specific installation problems? [07:42:31] "MediaWiki" is not an entity and can't host anything [07:43:21] lia: mediawiki can be installed on any system that meets the requirements: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Installation_requirements [07:44:17] hello Taueres, I do understand about that, but what I want like how we host our wordpress in WPEngine, because WPEngine is specialist in wordpress [07:44:31] so we also want to host our mediawiki in a specialist hosting [07:45:29] Nemo_bis: I think they're talking about hosting the software on their server, rather than the software hosting them [07:46:51] I heard about wikiversity https://en.wikiversity.org [07:47:12] our goal is same like that, for education [07:47:50] lia: https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Starting_and_Running_a_Wiki_Website/Hosted_Wikis is linked from https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Installing_MediaWiki