[00:40:34] csteipp: Missing a 1.23.9 tag [00:40:34] GPHemsley: Stuff is still clearing Jenkins, then I'll tag it [00:40:35] Ah, OK [00:40:35] Oh, that was the last one just now... tags will be in shortly [00:40:35] cool [00:41:11] 1.19.x is EOL in May. [00:41:29] csteipp: On another topic, update on this when you get a chance? https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=878214 [00:44:09] 1.23.9 tag should be in now [00:47:42] mol = 6,023 x 10^23 [00:47:46] oops wrong chat [01:59:10] quick questin! on some maintenance scripts, I see --wiki (for specifying the wiki ID)... what is the wiki id most used for? thanks [02:00:05] hypergrove: multi-wiki or wiki farm setups [02:00:49] so it's not referenced in base mw code? [02:02:33] i can look it up, sorry to ask [02:08:25] hypergrove: for maintenance scripts it sets which wiki the script will run on when there are several wikis on that server [04:04:40] getting some error messages with application of patch for 1.24.2 on a test system -- any one upgrading? details of upgrade output here: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Thread:Project:Support_desk/Upgrading_to_1.24.2_using_patch [04:06:42] quiet here [04:28:55] any have experience upgrading mediawiki? [04:35:15] harriboo: Go ahead and ask your question. If anyone knows, they'll help. [04:37:00] i am upgrading to 1.24.2 -- have a bunch of errors... not sure they mean anything [04:38:20] harriboo: Pastebin the errors. [04:38:29] !pastebin [04:38:30] To avoid overflowing the channel with inane amounts of text, use https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/paste/create/ or other awesome pastebin sites to share code, errors, and other large texts. [04:39:10] I did a long post to the 'support desk'. It is here: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Project:Support_desk#Upgrading_to_1.24.2_using_patch_55577 [05:02:42] ? [05:43:58] harriboo you have a reply https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Thread:Project:Support_desk/Upgrading_to_1.24.2_using_patch/reply [05:45:32] since it's "only" the test dir, you can ignore. Though, from (new) user feeling, it#s definitely a shitty experience to have [05:49:16] I have been using mediawiki for a while... [05:50:04] upgraded probably a dozen times... this has happened two or three times [05:50:59] makes me think they should create a config setting somewhere that can automatically purge the test files when generating patch files [05:52:26] guess i should get my head into bugtracker [05:52:27] feel free to implement it, it's opensource [05:52:34] bugt. is agood idea [05:58:14] Is 'Gruntfile.js' also in testing? [05:59:30] for me it is, I am on 1.23.x though: "The next patch would delete the file tests/frontend/Gruntfile.js," [06:07:50] Thanks Erkan... [06:15:40] tried out the bugtracker -- https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T94664?workflow=create [06:16:52] any how... I am out. thanks once again! [06:49:00] apergos: O: [06:49:56] ? [06:50:14] apergos: you flagged for proxy :P [06:51:23] proxy for what? [07:01:26] https://twitter.com/CERN/status/583147747710263296 [07:01:32] and so it begins :-P [07:09:41] https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Phabricator/Help#Migrating_your_Bugzilla_votes [08:51:17] Hello all, I'm trying to upgrade from 1.23.8 to 1.23.9 using the patch. Having some problems. [08:51:43] 1. is the patch reversed? 'patch' claims so [08:52:05] will be easily solved by using -R, I just wanted to verify [08:53:32] 2. for some reason my installation seems to be missing directories (e.g. tests/parser and tests/phpunit). It's weird that the previous patch didn't complain. [08:54:05] I can just copy the missing dirs/files from a full package of 1.23.9, but again, I just wanted to verify that this is the way to go [08:55:40] cmavr8: are the missing directories all in tests? [08:57:35] yes. plus a file: Gruntfile.js in root [08:58:15] for which I get strange messages from patch. If I run it normally, I get "The next patch would delete the file tests/frontend/Gruntfile.js,which does not exist! Assume -R? [n] " [08:58:55] if I run patch with -R, I get "The next patch, when reversed, would delete the file Gruntfile.js, which does not exist! Ignore -R? [n]' [08:59:12] all this is done with --dry-run of course. [09:00:54] cmavr8 prss everywhere just enter [09:01:13] see https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Thread:Project:Support_desk/Upgrading_to_1.24.2_using_patch/reply [09:01:28] also, I am on 1.23.x though: "The next patch would delete the file tests/frontend/Gruntfile.js," [09:01:32] it's also in test [09:08:37] Yeah, same issue exactly. https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/mediawiki-l/2015-March/044200.html Thanks Erkan. I [09:09:49] I'll wait a bit and just copy fiels over manually. I hope it doesn't freak out patch, when I apply it afterwards [09:29:34] oh no that won't work... I'll get all the "Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R?" from patch. So, how are others dealing with this? [09:39:44] Is there any reason Wikipedia doesn't use JavaScript content? (for example: interactive demonstrations for mathematical concepts). Does this go against the grain of MediaWiki architecture somehow? [09:44:29] My site flatly refuses to use favicon.ico, regardless of setting of "$wgFavicon = "favicon.ico";". I do *not* see load attempts in the logs. What should I check? [09:44:43] cmavr8 as said: I pressed everywhere just enter + that will work for you too [11:10:40] Hi! I've got a very specific question about the OutputPage and ImagePage classes. Is anybody around that I can talk to? [11:42:23] yay, 1.24.2 is out [11:42:41] time to match an update patch for freebsd ports and pester the maintainer with it :P [13:13:56] RobotsOnDrugs: thanks for pestering them ;) [13:14:00] That's useful work [13:16:18] it ended up being a really simple patch, but hey, if i can save the maintainer a little bit of time and show that it's been tested, it gets committed faster :) [13:49:40] How come `` just displays as text in a MediaWiki page? [13:55:11] http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:$wgAllowUserJs says `$wgAllowUserJs = true;` which I've done, but still no luck. [16:13:29] #libreidea is looking for voluntary devs php-js to add an essential functionality >> full details here: http://www.libreidea.org/w/index.php/Collaborative_matrix [16:52:06] Im trying to edit the sidebar... I have a section Section 1 (not a link) using *Section 1 in the code. How can I create SubSection 1.1 so it is not a link and not at same level as Section 1? [16:53:00] ** ? [16:53:08] https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Interface/Sidebar [16:53:17] That makes it a link and I don't want it to be [16:54:04] true, "Second-level list elements are links" [16:55:23] Bummer, no way to indent and not make link? [16:56:54] I guess I can make them first-level and use nbsp to move over [16:59:47] Where do I look for markup for sidebar elements? [17:27:10] Is there any way to configure MediaWiki to allow a wiki user to edit a page to contain JavaScript? I'm aware that it opens a possible security breach, but for my particular use case I am making my own private wiki of which I will be the only editor, so security isn't an issue: I will be the only user of the wiki. [17:28:09] wgRawHtml [17:28:26] pi-: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:$wgRawHtml [17:28:32] I'm not a l33t h4xx0r btw, this is my Wiki: http://46.101.38.186/index.php/Neuroscience -- it is even more dull than hacking computers [17:29:10] well, hacking computers is super fun, so I'll assume neuroscience is almost super-fun :) [17:30:12] csteipp: I have found practical neuroscience (a.k.a dropping psychedelics) to be illuminating [17:30:32] Thanks for the link, that is a relief. I was beginning to worry it could not be done. [17:35:27] Is it possible to allow certain pages to be publicly editable & not allow raw HTML? Or conversely to somehow grant superuser privileges to a particular page? I want certain pages to have dynamic content (interactive maths proofs, music training games etc), but the majority of the wiki will be normal content. I may wish to allow certain pages to be user-editable in the future... [17:35:55] I've got a lot of different projects and I would like my mediawiki to host all of them. [17:36:08] Is it possible to do this within one Wiki? [17:54:58] I'm reading through https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Preventing_access [17:55:45] What I can't figure out is whether a page created (by making up a link from an existing page) inherits the permissions of the original page. [17:57:17] That would seem like a neat way of doing it. That way I could have a subwiki, so to speak, that comprises a single page configured so that anyone can edit it. Then people could branch new pages from it. [18:06:29] I don't see how $wgRawHtml plays out with $wgAllowUserJs -- I was expecting the latter to allow JS http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:$wgAllowUserJs but it seems to have no effect. [19:42:36] is there an extension or extensions for finding how pages are linked to each other (maybe in a tree structure) so one knows how many pages are there in the wiki and how they are related ? [22:05:55] Hi, can you help me fix this? https://nsindex.net/wiki/NationDates - version: https://nsindex.net/wiki/Special:Version [22:06:06] I already set the permissions to 755. [22:06:26] Charlotte_Ryberg: What is wrong with it? [22:06:40] I think Scribunto is not working properly. [22:07:38] I get an Internal error, claiming that the binary I set the permissions to is not executable. [22:11:33] Charlotte_Ryberg, selinux/some other security measure? in general, it's advisable to move executables out of web root [22:16:33] Hi, Scribunto did work fine before I moved up to 1.24.2. from 1.24.1. [22:21:17] If it is not selinux, when what is it? Did I upset anyone? [22:55:30] Hi folks [22:57:01] I'm trying to include a mediawiki page in an iframe on Confluence (and that's all I have to say about Confluence). The page isn't rendering. I've got a sandbox site that's configured the same, as far as I can tell, and the same page on it does render. I'm seeing that the difference in the html source is the path, the site name, and on the failed page, patrol items, like "mediawki.page.patrol.ajax" [22:57:37] I haven't found any good explanations of what patrol is, or found it in the mediawiki source tree. Does anyone know what it is, and how I can get rid of it? [22:59:20] trueskew, https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Patrolled_edits [23:00:09] Thanks MaxSem, I'll take a look [23:27:56] I've added more details about the problem at: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Thread:Project:Support_desk/Internal_error_in_Scribunto_-_Exception_from_line_167