[08:01:21] <rolodata>	 Platonides estas ahi?
[08:30:01] <ShakespeareFan00>	 Hi
[08:30:05] <ShakespeareFan00>	 In the software
[08:30:22] <ShakespeareFan00>	 Is there an 'alternate-account' flag that can be set as a user right?
[08:30:45] <ShakespeareFan00>	 Mostly so that you can group accounts like you can IRC handles?
[08:44:56] <wikier>	 hello
[08:45:13] <wikier>	 anyone here?
[08:45:13] <wm-bot>	 Hi wikier, I am here, if you need anything, please ask, otherwise no one is going to help you... Thank you
[08:45:36] <wikier>	 I can't log in to my mediawiki
[08:45:37] <wikier>	 There seems to be a problem with your login session; this action has been canceled as a precaution against session hijacking. Go back to the previous page, reload that page and then try again.
[08:45:42] <wikier>	 with this messary
[08:45:47] <wikier>	 message, sorry
[09:34:29] <p858snake|_>	 ShakespeareFan00: nope
[09:34:48] <ShakespeareFan00>	 p858snake|_:  I may file this on phab
[09:35:12] <ShakespeareFan00>	 It seems to be a bit odd the alternates have to be manually declared
[09:35:31] <ShakespeareFan00>	 (ALso having an 'alternate-account' flag would make it easier to mark supect socks)
[11:02:42] <Flexman>	 varnent: hi! did you create that wikishare plugin?
[14:07:50] <Platonides>	 rolodata: no
[14:07:53] <Platonides>	 ahora si
[14:10:21] <rolodata>	 platonides: ¿podrias volver a hacerte op un momento? 
[14:11:06] <Platonides>	 si, por?
[14:11:29] <rolodata>	 bien, haz esto: 
[14:12:13] <rolodata>	 Escribe el comando: /msg chanserv set #mediawiki guard on 
[14:12:38] <Platonides>	 para?
[14:12:49] <Platonides>	 aparte que no sé si tengo permisos
[14:12:55] <rolodata>	 hazlo, 
[14:13:27] <Platonides>	 eso sirve para tener a chanserv en el canal
[14:13:42] <rolodata>	 a
[14:13:43] <rolodata>	 si
[14:13:52] <rolodata>	 chanserv vendria muy bien con el troll con el que lidiamos
[14:14:03] <rolodata>	 Necesitamos que traigas a nuestro bot preferido
[14:14:44] <Platonides>	 lo que dices no tiene sentido
[14:14:54] <rolodata>	 Necesitamos Chanserv
[14:15:29] <Platonides>	 {{reference needed}}
[14:16:06] <rolodata>	 Por favor, trae a chanserv a este canal
[14:16:14] <Platonides>	 no creo que pueda
[14:16:17] <Platonides>	 ni veo la necesidad
[14:16:19] <rolodata>	 intentalo
[14:16:32] <rolodata>	 tipea el comando y te dira si tienes aceso
[14:16:39] <rolodata>	 accesso*
[14:18:02] <rolodata>	 sabras si tienes aceso si tipeas el comando. ChanServ es NECESARIO
[14:20:20] <Platonides>	 no lo es
[14:23:16] <AlvaroMolina>	 rolodata: Además, el no tiene el flag +s aquí, por lo que el comando no lo podría usar en este canal.
[14:24:07] <Platonides>	 bastante es que me dieron op hace unos días
[14:46:50] <lime_>	 my debian server isn't sending emails, perhaps a package missing?
[14:49:50] <Platonides>	 how do you have the email configured?
[15:06:06] <lime_>	 I get this response
[15:06:10] <lime_>	 Mailer returned: Unknown error in PHP's mail() function.
[15:06:24] <lime_>	 nothing in the apache log
[15:06:39] <lime_>	 i'll check the php err log
[15:10:02] <lime_>	 yeah, nothing
[15:10:30] <lime_>	 i haven't changed the config, I'll take a look through
[15:11:13] <Platonides>	 does php mail() work?
[15:11:29] <Platonides>	 alternatively, you could configure mediawiki to use an external smtp server
[15:11:33] <Platonides>	 !wg SMTP | lime_ 
[15:11:33] <wm-bot>	 lime_: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:%24wgSMTP
[15:12:04] <lime_>	 thanks
[15:14:19] <Platonides>	 if mail() doesn't work, there's little mediawiki itsel fcan do
[15:14:31] <Platonides>	 *mediawiki itself can do
[15:15:12] <lime_>	 I know it's just hooking into the php() function
[16:09:12] <Platonides>	 ~
[17:28:03] <Dereckson>	 y a un système d'enveloppes
[17:28:10] <Dereckson>	 hmmmm
[17:28:17] <Dereckson>	 wrong window
[21:10:39] <legoktm>	 !bug 1
[21:10:39] <wm-bot>	 https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/1
[21:11:08] <legoktm>	 Works fine.
[21:44:49] <CGML>	 So, the Quassel client stores credentials in plain text, as I guess it's kind of forced to do.  Is there any possibility of doing something more secure?  I can't think of what, since there's no getting around credential storage if you're asked to store credentials...