[00:00:46] CZauX, Because it's probably not a good idea that MW can arbitarily write to the root dir and create files [00:02:27] In theory, but other frameworks do it just fine in practice. Not having an update mechanism adds another layer of complexity on those looking to make their own wiki's [00:03:53] it doesn't add anything [00:04:08] it just doesn't take away the complexity that is modifying the application's files [00:06:21] Comparatively, it does add more work than other solutions, and leaves sites that aren't consistently maintained by a sysadmin vulnerable. [00:06:50] sites that aren't maintained by sysadmins are vulnerable [00:07:35] don't have systems that you aren't prepared to maintain [00:08:50] Please forgive my ignorance if this is the wrong place to ask, but I'm writing a bot which parses template-usages, and having a hard time to understand the syntax. [00:09:02] In particular if a template usage's parameters can have comments embedded like , how is a character string like ", or a parameter's value that contains the text "" [00:10:55] no [00:10:58] by 'the template usage' [00:11:01] show me what you mean [00:13:13] OK, from the Wikipedia page: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=.308_Winchester&action=edit [00:13:53] ... we see the parameter "|pressure_method2=SAAMI\n" [00:14:31] the parameter pressure_method2 with value "SAAMI\n\n", yes [00:14:57] But when rendered, the comment is stripped out. [00:15:24] yeah [00:16:02] Now, if the editor had intented the parameter "pressure_method2" to have the value "SAAMI\n", with the